Added RawDataContainer conformances to APITesters#1550
Merged
Conversation
35f38bc to
2819b1b
Compare
7 tasks
NachoSoto
added a commit
that referenced
this pull request
May 24, 2022
### Depends on: - #1537 - #1540 - #1541 - #1543 - #1546 - #1547 - #1550 - #1551, - #1565 ### Changes - Removed all custom deserialization code thanks to #1537, #1541, and #1543. - The format of the customer info response is now very concise and only in one place (`CustomerInfoResponse`) instead of being passed through dictionaries and magic strings everywhere. - `CustomerInfo` was combining the dictionaries inside of `"subscriptions"` and `"non_subscriptions"`, despite them having different formats. This is now made explicit through type conversions between the two, (see `CustomerInfoResponse.allTransactionsByProductId`). - Removed all custom `CustomerInfo` errors since deserialization is automatic, and the underlying `Error` information will be provided thanks to `ErrorUtils.logDecodingError`. - `CustomerInfo` deserialization always wraps errors into `ErrorCode.customerInfoError`, which is now also covered in a new test. - Added a new snapshot test that covers `CustomerInfo` serialization by storing the result in a JSON file. ### Other changes: - `CustomerInfo` equality is now automatic through the `CustomerInfoResponse` `Equatable` conformance. - Simplified `schemaVersion` handling - All tests still use `CustomerInfo(data: [String: Any])`, but that method is only visible for tests now, and it uses the underlying `Decodable` implementation (see `CustomerInfo+TestExtensions.swift`). - Added extra tests for `CustomerInfoResponse` that use a fixture `CustomerInfo.json`, which is easier to maintain than having JSON in code. - `RawDataContainer` implementation is changed in #1565. ### TODO: - [x] Fix all tests - [x] Update `RawValueContainer` - [x] Consider recovering `CustomerInfoError` - [x] Look at all previously logged errors - [x] Finish `CustomerInfoResponseTests` - [x] Handle all TODOs - [x] Make `RawDataContainer` actually store all the original data: #1565
Merged
NachoSoto
added a commit
that referenced
this pull request
May 26, 2022
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
These were missing.