Conversation
sys/include/net/ng_ipv6/netif.h
Outdated
There was a problem hiding this comment.
By a DHCPv6 server e.g. (see https://tools.ietf.org/html/rfc4861#section-4.2)
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Can you amend this information?
There was a problem hiding this comment.
The plan was to reference the flag when the header was included, but since it is not here yet: sure.
|
Addressed comments |
|
Is #2728 already included or do I confuse something? |
|
It's not and this PR is independent from that. |
|
https://github.com/RIOT-OS/RIOT/pull/2728/files#diff-db9a1a910efb231b7ee7971f29055350R65 and the following lines look very similar to the code in this PR. |
|
Mh… maybe it sneaked in here, we'll see what happens if I hit the merge button there :D |
|
Arghs it obviously did :D will rebase. |
f3fb2b3 to
ce9ea96
Compare
|
Rebased |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Just a reminder: #2909 (comment) triggered this change.
|
ACK. Please squash! |
62a2343 to
b11a607
Compare
|
Squashed with no merge conflicts. |
b11a607 to
b61971b
Compare
|
There was an error in the unittests. Please check if you are happy with the current state of |
|
This is a superficial ACK. If @Lotterleben or @cgundogan or someone else wants to do a more careful review, please say so. Otherwise I would say that this is ready to be merged. |
|
@OlegHahm oof. Don't know if I could do a proper review before sunday, so... Go ahead. :) |
b61971b to
2e04287
Compare
2e04287 to
9899153
Compare
|
Rebased to current master |
|
Since #2910 got ACK'd too I'd prefer to merge that one. This PR will be merged automatically too then. |
|
Let's do this as soon as Travis is fine. |
|
But then we risk, that I might need to rebase #2910 again… |
|
Ah, sorry, I misread: you want to merge #2910 including this one implicitly? Works for me. |
yes |
NDP needs a bigger flag space (this PR introduces some of the new flags). This also simplifies some of the usage.