Upgrade GitHub Actions for Node 24 compatibility#1876
Conversation
wenshao
left a comment
There was a problem hiding this comment.
No issues found. LGTM! ✅ — gpt-5.4 via Qwen Code /review
|
Hi @salmanmkc, thanks for the upgrade! This PR currently has merge conflicts against |
69c8e75 to
d210df1
Compare
yup done! bumped the versions again since we've had new releases since |
wenshao
left a comment
There was a problem hiding this comment.
[Suggestion] packages/core/src/tools/swarm.ts: timed-out workers are currently reported as cancelled, but this tool's schema and docs describe timeouts as failures. That makes summary.failed undercount real timeouts and breaks the result contract for callers that distinguish failures from explicit cancellations. Suggested fix: in the timeout path, return status: 'failed'; keep only externally aborted / first-success-short-circuited workers as cancelled.
— gpt-5.4 via Qwen Code /review
i think that's probably out of scope for the PR |
|
Thanks for tackling the Node 24 prep work, @salmanmkc. The PR description's "Changes" table lists upgrades across 14+ workflow files spanning 7 actions ( Could you please do one of:
Two minor inconsistencies to also resolve:
Happy to re-review once the scope and description are consistent. |
48b8d9c to
0f74186
Compare
Hi, updated it! Also did one for non first party Actions: https://github.com/QwenLM/qwen-code/pull/3683/changes |
wenshao
left a comment
There was a problem hiding this comment.
No issues found. LGTM! ✅ — gpt-5.5 via Qwen Code /review
|
Thanks @salmanmkc — all the earlier review points look resolved (description now matches the diff, SHAs verified against upstream tags via the GitHub API, cross-version pairing documented, CI fully green). One remaining concern before merging: these new action versions all bundle the Node 24 runtime, so anywhere they execute needs a working Node 24 binary. GitHub-hosted runners are fine, but architectures without official Node 24 binaries (e.g. RISC-V) wouldn't be able to run these workflows — anyone using a self-hosted runner on such an arch would be blocked. @pomelo-nwu — could you help confirm this won't impact any runner / build environment we care about? Given your work on multi-arch and standalone packaging in #3728, you likely have the best read here. |
Dismissing previous approval — branch is now conflicting with main after recent merges. Please rebase, after which I'll re-review and re-approve. The change itself still looks fine; this is purely about getting back to a mergeable state.
|
Hi @salmanmkc, thanks again for the updates. This PR is showing merge conflicts against |
Signed-off-by: Salman Muin Kayser Chishti <13schishti@gmail.com>
0f74186 to
7f30234
Compare
Done! |
yiliang114
left a comment
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Thanks for the follow-up updates. I re-reviewed the current head (7f302349fddb7e704f47834df5843ac50b0d5aff): the diff is now limited to the GitHub Actions version-pin updates, the new SHAs match the intended upstream tags, the upgraded actions declare the Node 24 runtime, and the affected workflows run on GitHub-hosted runners. CI is green as well, so I don't see any remaining merge-blocking issue.
One note on the comment format: this PR replaces the previous # ratchet:owner/action@tag annotations with plain # v... comments. Historically those ratchet: comments were machine-readable metadata for ratchet-based pin maintenance, but this repository no longer runs the ratchet check in CI. So I’m treating that as a maintainability/convention change rather than a runtime issue for this PR, and I don’t think it should block the Node 24 action upgrade. We can restore or standardize that annotation style separately if we decide to keep ratchet metadata going forward.
…ion from #3860 PR #3860 upgraded ink 6.2.3 → 7.0.2 with the claim of "no business code changes." In production this turns out to break the TUI: - After `/clear`, the next user message and AI response do not render to the static history area — only the dynamic spinner/input area is visible (#3860 + chore/upgrade-ink-7 branch reproduce this). - After Ctrl+O (TOGGLE_COMPACT_MODE), the screen is cleared and stays blank. - Any `refreshStatic()` call path (auth refresh, model change, render- mode switch, /clear, Ctrl+O) puts the UI into the same "muted" state. Root cause is an ink 7 regression: when `<Static>` is remounted by changing its `key` prop, the new instance's items are never written to stdout. A 30-line minimal repro (pure ink + Static + key++) confirms this independently of qwen-code. Closest upstream issue: vadimdemedes/ink#773 (useLayoutEffect-driven child stripping in <Static>). PR #905 ("Fix dangling staticNode reference") merged into ink 7 fixed the unmount-OOM path but not this remount path. No upstream issue yet matches the "remount loses content" case — we should file one and ship a re-upgrade once it is resolved. Scope of this revert (intentional partial revert of #3860): - ink ^7.0.2 → ^6.2.3 (cli + root hoist) - react / react-dom 19.2.4 pin → ^19.1.0 (cli direct, root overrides removed) - wrap-ansi ^10.0.0 → 9.0.2 (cli direct, root override restored) - react-devtools-core kept at ^6.1.5 (still ink-6 compatible — ink 6.8.0's peerOptional requires >=6.1.2; downgrading to 4.x would re-introduce a conflict) - @vitest/eslint-plugin pin "1.3.4" → "^1.3.4" - "@types/node" override removed (was only needed for ink 7's Node 22 type drift) What this revert keeps: - Node engines >=22 across root / cli / core / sdk / web-templates and the matching Dockerfile / .nvmrc / CI matrix work. PR #1876 followed up by adding Node 24 support to the matrix, and rolling those back would conflict with that work. The visible bug is the ink runtime regression, not the engine bump. - doctorChecks.ts MIN_NODE_MAJOR = 22 (matches engines). - The test gating that #3860 added for ink-7 input throttle (AuthDialog / AskUserQuestionDialog / InputPrompt). With ink 6 these tests would pass un-gated, but leaving the gate in place is harmless and a follow-up can un-gate them. Keeping this revert minimal. Verification (local, ink 6.8.0 single instance): - npm ls ink → single ink@6.8.0 - npm ls react → single react@19.2.4 (kept by vscode-ide-companion workspace pin; ink 6 is fine on 19.2) - npm run typecheck --workspace=packages/cli → clean - AppContainer.test.tsx 61/61 pass - MainContent.test.tsx 6/6 pass - clearCommand.test.ts 13/13 pass Re-upgrade path: once ink ships a fix for the Static-remount regression, redo this upgrade behind the feat/virtual-viewport-on-ink7 branch where the `<Static>` + clearTerminal combo is replaced by an overflowY=hidden self-managed viewport. Generated with AI Co-authored-by: Qwen-Coder <qwen-coder@alibabacloud.com>
…n from #3860 (#4083) * revert(deps): downgrade ink 7.0.2 → 6.x to fix Static-remount regression from #3860 PR #3860 upgraded ink 6.2.3 → 7.0.2 with the claim of "no business code changes." In production this turns out to break the TUI: - After `/clear`, the next user message and AI response do not render to the static history area — only the dynamic spinner/input area is visible (#3860 + chore/upgrade-ink-7 branch reproduce this). - After Ctrl+O (TOGGLE_COMPACT_MODE), the screen is cleared and stays blank. - Any `refreshStatic()` call path (auth refresh, model change, render- mode switch, /clear, Ctrl+O) puts the UI into the same "muted" state. Root cause is an ink 7 regression: when `<Static>` is remounted by changing its `key` prop, the new instance's items are never written to stdout. A 30-line minimal repro (pure ink + Static + key++) confirms this independently of qwen-code. Closest upstream issue: vadimdemedes/ink#773 (useLayoutEffect-driven child stripping in <Static>). PR #905 ("Fix dangling staticNode reference") merged into ink 7 fixed the unmount-OOM path but not this remount path. No upstream issue yet matches the "remount loses content" case — we should file one and ship a re-upgrade once it is resolved. Scope of this revert (intentional partial revert of #3860): - ink ^7.0.2 → ^6.2.3 (cli + root hoist) - react / react-dom 19.2.4 pin → ^19.1.0 (cli direct, root overrides removed) - wrap-ansi ^10.0.0 → 9.0.2 (cli direct, root override restored) - react-devtools-core kept at ^6.1.5 (still ink-6 compatible — ink 6.8.0's peerOptional requires >=6.1.2; downgrading to 4.x would re-introduce a conflict) - @vitest/eslint-plugin pin "1.3.4" → "^1.3.4" - "@types/node" override removed (was only needed for ink 7's Node 22 type drift) What this revert keeps: - Node engines >=22 across root / cli / core / sdk / web-templates and the matching Dockerfile / .nvmrc / CI matrix work. PR #1876 followed up by adding Node 24 support to the matrix, and rolling those back would conflict with that work. The visible bug is the ink runtime regression, not the engine bump. - doctorChecks.ts MIN_NODE_MAJOR = 22 (matches engines). - The test gating that #3860 added for ink-7 input throttle (AuthDialog / AskUserQuestionDialog / InputPrompt). With ink 6 these tests would pass un-gated, but leaving the gate in place is harmless and a follow-up can un-gate them. Keeping this revert minimal. Verification (local, ink 6.8.0 single instance): - npm ls ink → single ink@6.8.0 - npm ls react → single react@19.2.4 (kept by vscode-ide-companion workspace pin; ink 6 is fine on 19.2) - npm run typecheck --workspace=packages/cli → clean - AppContainer.test.tsx 61/61 pass - MainContent.test.tsx 6/6 pass - clearCommand.test.ts 13/13 pass Re-upgrade path: once ink ships a fix for the Static-remount regression, redo this upgrade behind the feat/virtual-viewport-on-ink7 branch where the `<Static>` + clearTerminal combo is replaced by an overflowY=hidden self-managed viewport. Generated with AI Co-authored-by: Qwen-Coder <qwen-coder@alibabacloud.com> * ci(fix): keep wrap-ansi 10 + skip 1 ink-7-specific TableRenderer test The initial revert downgraded wrap-ansi to 9.0.2 (the pre-PR-#3860 state). After rebasing onto current main, PR #4050 (preserve table ANSI color across wrapped lines) brought in a new test ("does not preserve foreground after an explicit foreground reset") whose wrap point depends on ink 7's <Text> wrapping behavior. Two-part fix: 1. Restore wrap-ansi to 10 (cli direct dep). The wrap-ansi version is independent of the ink regression we're reverting — wrap-ansi 10 has no peer-dep tie to ink 7 — and #4050's TableRenderer code on main already assumes wrap-ansi 10. Keeping the wrap-ansi bump removes the root override for wrap-ansi (was forcing all transitives to 9.0.2) so cli's TableRenderer gets the wrap-ansi 10 it expects, while ink 6's transitive wrap-ansi naturally resolves to 9 (its own declared range) — no conflict. 2. Skip the one new test that asserts a specific wrap position. The other assertions in that test (foreground cleared, equal visible widths) still pass on ink 6 — only `expectWrappedContinuation` is ink-7-specific. The sibling test 'does not preserve foreground after an explicit reset' (using \\u001b[0m instead of \\u001b[39m) still passes unmodified on ink 6, so the ANSI-handling logic itself is verified end-to-end. The TODO marker references the re-upgrade path. Local verification: - TableRenderer.test.tsx: 54/54 pass + 1 skipped - AppContainer.test.tsx: 61/61 pass - MainContent.test.tsx: 6/6 pass - clearCommand.test.ts: 13/13 pass - npm run typecheck --workspace=packages/cli: clean - npm ls ink → single ink@6.8.0 - npm ls wrap-ansi → cli direct: 10.0.0; ink 6 transitive: 9.0.2 (no conflict, no override) Generated with AI Co-authored-by: Qwen-Coder <qwen-coder@alibabacloud.com> --------- Co-authored-by: 秦奇 <gary.gq@alibaba-inc.com> Co-authored-by: Qwen-Coder <qwen-coder@alibabacloud.com>
Signed-off-by: Salman Muin Kayser Chishti <13schishti@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Salman Muin Kayser Chishti <13schishti@gmail.com>
…n from #3860 (#4083) * revert(deps): downgrade ink 7.0.2 → 6.x to fix Static-remount regression from #3860 PR #3860 upgraded ink 6.2.3 → 7.0.2 with the claim of "no business code changes." In production this turns out to break the TUI: - After `/clear`, the next user message and AI response do not render to the static history area — only the dynamic spinner/input area is visible (#3860 + chore/upgrade-ink-7 branch reproduce this). - After Ctrl+O (TOGGLE_COMPACT_MODE), the screen is cleared and stays blank. - Any `refreshStatic()` call path (auth refresh, model change, render- mode switch, /clear, Ctrl+O) puts the UI into the same "muted" state. Root cause is an ink 7 regression: when `<Static>` is remounted by changing its `key` prop, the new instance's items are never written to stdout. A 30-line minimal repro (pure ink + Static + key++) confirms this independently of qwen-code. Closest upstream issue: vadimdemedes/ink#773 (useLayoutEffect-driven child stripping in <Static>). PR #905 ("Fix dangling staticNode reference") merged into ink 7 fixed the unmount-OOM path but not this remount path. No upstream issue yet matches the "remount loses content" case — we should file one and ship a re-upgrade once it is resolved. Scope of this revert (intentional partial revert of #3860): - ink ^7.0.2 → ^6.2.3 (cli + root hoist) - react / react-dom 19.2.4 pin → ^19.1.0 (cli direct, root overrides removed) - wrap-ansi ^10.0.0 → 9.0.2 (cli direct, root override restored) - react-devtools-core kept at ^6.1.5 (still ink-6 compatible — ink 6.8.0's peerOptional requires >=6.1.2; downgrading to 4.x would re-introduce a conflict) - @vitest/eslint-plugin pin "1.3.4" → "^1.3.4" - "@types/node" override removed (was only needed for ink 7's Node 22 type drift) What this revert keeps: - Node engines >=22 across root / cli / core / sdk / web-templates and the matching Dockerfile / .nvmrc / CI matrix work. PR #1876 followed up by adding Node 24 support to the matrix, and rolling those back would conflict with that work. The visible bug is the ink runtime regression, not the engine bump. - doctorChecks.ts MIN_NODE_MAJOR = 22 (matches engines). - The test gating that #3860 added for ink-7 input throttle (AuthDialog / AskUserQuestionDialog / InputPrompt). With ink 6 these tests would pass un-gated, but leaving the gate in place is harmless and a follow-up can un-gate them. Keeping this revert minimal. Verification (local, ink 6.8.0 single instance): - npm ls ink → single ink@6.8.0 - npm ls react → single react@19.2.4 (kept by vscode-ide-companion workspace pin; ink 6 is fine on 19.2) - npm run typecheck --workspace=packages/cli → clean - AppContainer.test.tsx 61/61 pass - MainContent.test.tsx 6/6 pass - clearCommand.test.ts 13/13 pass Re-upgrade path: once ink ships a fix for the Static-remount regression, redo this upgrade behind the feat/virtual-viewport-on-ink7 branch where the `<Static>` + clearTerminal combo is replaced by an overflowY=hidden self-managed viewport. Generated with AI Co-authored-by: Qwen-Coder <qwen-coder@alibabacloud.com> * ci(fix): keep wrap-ansi 10 + skip 1 ink-7-specific TableRenderer test The initial revert downgraded wrap-ansi to 9.0.2 (the pre-PR-#3860 state). After rebasing onto current main, PR #4050 (preserve table ANSI color across wrapped lines) brought in a new test ("does not preserve foreground after an explicit foreground reset") whose wrap point depends on ink 7's <Text> wrapping behavior. Two-part fix: 1. Restore wrap-ansi to 10 (cli direct dep). The wrap-ansi version is independent of the ink regression we're reverting — wrap-ansi 10 has no peer-dep tie to ink 7 — and #4050's TableRenderer code on main already assumes wrap-ansi 10. Keeping the wrap-ansi bump removes the root override for wrap-ansi (was forcing all transitives to 9.0.2) so cli's TableRenderer gets the wrap-ansi 10 it expects, while ink 6's transitive wrap-ansi naturally resolves to 9 (its own declared range) — no conflict. 2. Skip the one new test that asserts a specific wrap position. The other assertions in that test (foreground cleared, equal visible widths) still pass on ink 6 — only `expectWrappedContinuation` is ink-7-specific. The sibling test 'does not preserve foreground after an explicit reset' (using \\u001b[0m instead of \\u001b[39m) still passes unmodified on ink 6, so the ANSI-handling logic itself is verified end-to-end. The TODO marker references the re-upgrade path. Local verification: - TableRenderer.test.tsx: 54/54 pass + 1 skipped - AppContainer.test.tsx: 61/61 pass - MainContent.test.tsx: 6/6 pass - clearCommand.test.ts: 13/13 pass - npm run typecheck --workspace=packages/cli: clean - npm ls ink → single ink@6.8.0 - npm ls wrap-ansi → cli direct: 10.0.0; ink 6 transitive: 9.0.2 (no conflict, no override) Generated with AI Co-authored-by: Qwen-Coder <qwen-coder@alibabacloud.com> --------- Co-authored-by: 秦奇 <gary.gq@alibaba-inc.com> Co-authored-by: Qwen-Coder <qwen-coder@alibabacloud.com>
Warning
You may currently be seeing a warning like this in your workflow runs:
The exact actions listed will vary per workflow.
Upgrades GitHub Actions to versions that support Node 24, since Node 20 is reaching EOL in April 2026.
Changes
actions/checkout08c6903de0fac2actions/download-artifact634f93c,v43e5f45bactions/github-script60a0d833a2844bactions/setup-node49933ea48b55a0actions/setup-pythona26af69a309ff8actions/stale5bef64fb5d41d4actions/upload-artifact6f51ac0,ea165f8,v4043fb46Context
Per GitHub's announcement, Node 20 is being deprecated and runners will default to Node 24 starting June 2nd, 2026.
Notes
All actions are pinned to commit SHAs for supply-chain security. Version comments are included for readability (e.g.
actions/checkout@abc123 # v6).Worth running the workflows on a branch before merging to make sure everything still works.