fix(curator): rewrite cron job skill refs after consolidation#18253
Merged
Conversation
When the curator consolidates skill X into umbrella Y, any cron job that listed X in its skills field would fail to load X at run time — the scheduler logs a warning and skips it, so the scheduled job runs without the instructions it was scheduled to follow. cron.jobs.rewrite_skill_refs(consolidated, pruned) now updates jobs in-place: consolidated names route to the umbrella target (dedup when umbrella is already present), pruned names are dropped. agent.curator._write_run_report calls it after classification, best-effort so a cron-side failure never breaks the curator itself. Results are recorded in run.json (counts.cron_jobs_rewritten + full cron_rewrites payload), a separate cron_rewrites.json for convenience when jobs were touched, and a section in REPORT.md. Reported by @tombielecki.
donald131
pushed a commit
to donald131/hermes-agent
that referenced
this pull request
May 2, 2026
…search#18253) When the curator consolidates skill X into umbrella Y, any cron job that listed X in its skills field would fail to load X at run time — the scheduler logs a warning and skips it, so the scheduled job runs without the instructions it was scheduled to follow. cron.jobs.rewrite_skill_refs(consolidated, pruned) now updates jobs in-place: consolidated names route to the umbrella target (dedup when umbrella is already present), pruned names are dropped. agent.curator._write_run_report calls it after classification, best-effort so a cron-side failure never breaks the curator itself. Results are recorded in run.json (counts.cron_jobs_rewritten + full cron_rewrites payload), a separate cron_rewrites.json for convenience when jobs were touched, and a section in REPORT.md. Reported by @tombielecki.
teknium1
added a commit
that referenced
this pull request
May 2, 2026
…ill links on rollback (#18671) (#18731) * fix(curator): authoritative absorbed_into declarations on skill delete Closes #18671. The classification pipeline that feeds cron-ref rewriting used to infer consolidation vs pruning from two brittle signals: the curator model's post-hoc YAML summary block, and a substring heuristic scanning other tool calls for the removed skill's name. Both miss in real consolidations — the model forgets the YAML under reasoning pressure, and the heuristic misses when the umbrella's patch content describes the absorbed behavior abstractly instead of naming the old slug. When both miss, the skill falls through to 'no-evidence fallback' pruned, and #18253's cron rewriter drops the cron ref entirely instead of mapping it to the umbrella. Same observable symptom as pre-#18253: 'Skill(s) not found and skipped' at the next cron run. The fix makes the model declare intent at the moment of deletion. skill_manage(action='delete') now accepts absorbed_into: - absorbed_into='<umbrella>' -> consolidated, target must exist on disk - absorbed_into='' -> explicit prune, no forwarding target - missing -> legacy path, falls through to heuristic/YAML The curator reconciler reads these declarations off llm_meta.tool_calls BEFORE either the YAML block or the substring heuristic. Declaration wins. Fallback logic stays intact for backward compat with any caller (human or older curator conversation) that doesn't populate the arg. Changes - tools/skill_manager_tool.py: add absorbed_into param to skill_manage + _delete_skill. Validate target exists when non-empty. Reject absorbed_into=<self>. Wire through dispatcher + registry + schema. - agent/curator.py: new _extract_absorbed_into_declarations() walks tool calls for skill_manage(delete) with the arg. _reconcile_classification accepts absorbed_declarations= and treats them as authoritative. Curator prompt updated to require the arg on every delete. - Tests: 7 new skill_manager tests covering the tool contract (valid target, empty string, nonexistent target, self-reference, whitespace, backward compat, dispatcher plumbing). 11 new curator tests covering the extractor + authoritative reconciler path + mixed-legacy-and- declared runs. Validation - 307/307 targeted tests pass (curator + cron + skill_manager suites). - E2E #18671 repro: 3 narrow skills, 1 umbrella, cron job referencing all 3. Model emits NO YAML block. Heuristic misses (patch prose doesn't name old slugs). Delete calls carry absorbed_into. Result: both PR skills correctly classified 'consolidated' + cron rewritten ['pr-review-format', 'pr-review-checklist', 'stale-junk'] -> ['hermes-agent-dev']; stale-junk pruned via absorbed_into=''. - E2E backward-compat: delete without absorbed_into, model emits YAML -> routed via existing 'model' source, cron still rewritten correctly. * feat(curator): capture + restore cron skill links across snapshot/rollback Before this, rolling back a curator run restored the skills tree but cron jobs still pointed at the umbrella skills the curator had rewritten them to. The user would see their old narrow skills back on disk but their cron jobs still configured with the merged umbrella — not actually 'back to how it was'. Snapshot side: snapshot_skills() now captures ~/.hermes/cron/jobs.json alongside the skills tarball, as cron-jobs.json. The manifest gets a new 'cron_jobs' block with {backed_up, jobs_count} so rollback (and the CLI confirm dialog) can surface what's in the snapshot. If jobs.json is missing/unreadable/malformed, snapshot proceeds without cron data — the skills backup is the core guarantee; cron is additive. Rollback side: after the skills extract succeeds, the new _restore_cron_skill_links() reconciles the backed-up jobs into the live jobs.json SURGICALLY. Only 'skills' and 'skill' fields are restored, and only on jobs matched by id. Everything else about a cron job — schedule, last_run_at, next_run_at, enabled, prompt, workdir, hooks — is live state the user or scheduler has modified since the snapshot; overwriting it would regress unrelated activity. Reconciliation rules: - Job in backup AND live, skills differ → skills restored. - Job in backup AND live, skills match → no-op. - Job in backup, NOT in live → skipped (user deleted it after snapshot; their choice is later than the snapshot). - Job in live, NOT in backup → untouched (user created it after snapshot). - Snapshot missing cron-jobs.json at all → rollback still succeeds, reports 'not captured' (older pre-feature snapshots keep working). Writes go through cron.jobs.save_jobs under the same _jobs_file_lock the scheduler uses, so rollback doesn't race tick(). Also: - hermes_cli/curator.py: rollback confirm dialog now shows 'cron jobs: N (will be restored for skill-link fields only)' when the snapshot has cron data, or 'not in snapshot (<reason>)' otherwise. - rollback()'s message string includes a 'cron links: ...' clause summarizing the reconciliation outcome. Tests - 9 new cases: snapshot-with-cron, snapshot-without-cron, malformed-json captured-as-raw, full rollback-restores-skills-and-cron, rollback touches only skill fields, rollback skips user-deleted jobs, rollback leaves user-created jobs untouched, rollback still works with pre-feature snapshot that has no cron-jobs.json, standalone unit test on _restore_cron_skill_links exercising the full report shape. Validation - 484/484 targeted tests pass (curator + cron + skill_manager suites). - E2E: real snapshot_skills, real cron rewrite, real rollback. Before: ['pr-review-format', 'pr-review-checklist', 'pr-triage-salvage']. After curator: ['hermes-agent-dev']. After rollback: ['pr-review-format', 'pr-review-checklist', 'pr-triage-salvage']. Non-skill fields (id, name, prompt) preserved across the round trip.
6 tasks
nickdlkk
pushed a commit
to nickdlkk/hermes-agent
that referenced
this pull request
May 11, 2026
…search#18253) When the curator consolidates skill X into umbrella Y, any cron job that listed X in its skills field would fail to load X at run time — the scheduler logs a warning and skips it, so the scheduled job runs without the instructions it was scheduled to follow. cron.jobs.rewrite_skill_refs(consolidated, pruned) now updates jobs in-place: consolidated names route to the umbrella target (dedup when umbrella is already present), pruned names are dropped. agent.curator._write_run_report calls it after classification, best-effort so a cron-side failure never breaks the curator itself. Results are recorded in run.json (counts.cron_jobs_rewritten + full cron_rewrites payload), a separate cron_rewrites.json for convenience when jobs were touched, and a section in REPORT.md. Reported by @tombielecki.
nickdlkk
pushed a commit
to nickdlkk/hermes-agent
that referenced
this pull request
May 11, 2026
…ill links on rollback (NousResearch#18671) (NousResearch#18731) * fix(curator): authoritative absorbed_into declarations on skill delete Closes NousResearch#18671. The classification pipeline that feeds cron-ref rewriting used to infer consolidation vs pruning from two brittle signals: the curator model's post-hoc YAML summary block, and a substring heuristic scanning other tool calls for the removed skill's name. Both miss in real consolidations — the model forgets the YAML under reasoning pressure, and the heuristic misses when the umbrella's patch content describes the absorbed behavior abstractly instead of naming the old slug. When both miss, the skill falls through to 'no-evidence fallback' pruned, and NousResearch#18253's cron rewriter drops the cron ref entirely instead of mapping it to the umbrella. Same observable symptom as pre-NousResearch#18253: 'Skill(s) not found and skipped' at the next cron run. The fix makes the model declare intent at the moment of deletion. skill_manage(action='delete') now accepts absorbed_into: - absorbed_into='<umbrella>' -> consolidated, target must exist on disk - absorbed_into='' -> explicit prune, no forwarding target - missing -> legacy path, falls through to heuristic/YAML The curator reconciler reads these declarations off llm_meta.tool_calls BEFORE either the YAML block or the substring heuristic. Declaration wins. Fallback logic stays intact for backward compat with any caller (human or older curator conversation) that doesn't populate the arg. Changes - tools/skill_manager_tool.py: add absorbed_into param to skill_manage + _delete_skill. Validate target exists when non-empty. Reject absorbed_into=<self>. Wire through dispatcher + registry + schema. - agent/curator.py: new _extract_absorbed_into_declarations() walks tool calls for skill_manage(delete) with the arg. _reconcile_classification accepts absorbed_declarations= and treats them as authoritative. Curator prompt updated to require the arg on every delete. - Tests: 7 new skill_manager tests covering the tool contract (valid target, empty string, nonexistent target, self-reference, whitespace, backward compat, dispatcher plumbing). 11 new curator tests covering the extractor + authoritative reconciler path + mixed-legacy-and- declared runs. Validation - 307/307 targeted tests pass (curator + cron + skill_manager suites). - E2E NousResearch#18671 repro: 3 narrow skills, 1 umbrella, cron job referencing all 3. Model emits NO YAML block. Heuristic misses (patch prose doesn't name old slugs). Delete calls carry absorbed_into. Result: both PR skills correctly classified 'consolidated' + cron rewritten ['pr-review-format', 'pr-review-checklist', 'stale-junk'] -> ['hermes-agent-dev']; stale-junk pruned via absorbed_into=''. - E2E backward-compat: delete without absorbed_into, model emits YAML -> routed via existing 'model' source, cron still rewritten correctly. * feat(curator): capture + restore cron skill links across snapshot/rollback Before this, rolling back a curator run restored the skills tree but cron jobs still pointed at the umbrella skills the curator had rewritten them to. The user would see their old narrow skills back on disk but their cron jobs still configured with the merged umbrella — not actually 'back to how it was'. Snapshot side: snapshot_skills() now captures ~/.hermes/cron/jobs.json alongside the skills tarball, as cron-jobs.json. The manifest gets a new 'cron_jobs' block with {backed_up, jobs_count} so rollback (and the CLI confirm dialog) can surface what's in the snapshot. If jobs.json is missing/unreadable/malformed, snapshot proceeds without cron data — the skills backup is the core guarantee; cron is additive. Rollback side: after the skills extract succeeds, the new _restore_cron_skill_links() reconciles the backed-up jobs into the live jobs.json SURGICALLY. Only 'skills' and 'skill' fields are restored, and only on jobs matched by id. Everything else about a cron job — schedule, last_run_at, next_run_at, enabled, prompt, workdir, hooks — is live state the user or scheduler has modified since the snapshot; overwriting it would regress unrelated activity. Reconciliation rules: - Job in backup AND live, skills differ → skills restored. - Job in backup AND live, skills match → no-op. - Job in backup, NOT in live → skipped (user deleted it after snapshot; their choice is later than the snapshot). - Job in live, NOT in backup → untouched (user created it after snapshot). - Snapshot missing cron-jobs.json at all → rollback still succeeds, reports 'not captured' (older pre-feature snapshots keep working). Writes go through cron.jobs.save_jobs under the same _jobs_file_lock the scheduler uses, so rollback doesn't race tick(). Also: - hermes_cli/curator.py: rollback confirm dialog now shows 'cron jobs: N (will be restored for skill-link fields only)' when the snapshot has cron data, or 'not in snapshot (<reason>)' otherwise. - rollback()'s message string includes a 'cron links: ...' clause summarizing the reconciliation outcome. Tests - 9 new cases: snapshot-with-cron, snapshot-without-cron, malformed-json captured-as-raw, full rollback-restores-skills-and-cron, rollback touches only skill fields, rollback skips user-deleted jobs, rollback leaves user-created jobs untouched, rollback still works with pre-feature snapshot that has no cron-jobs.json, standalone unit test on _restore_cron_skill_links exercising the full report shape. Validation - 484/484 targeted tests pass (curator + cron + skill_manager suites). - E2E: real snapshot_skills, real cron rewrite, real rollback. Before: ['pr-review-format', 'pr-review-checklist', 'pr-triage-salvage']. After curator: ['hermes-agent-dev']. After rollback: ['pr-review-format', 'pr-review-checklist', 'pr-triage-salvage']. Non-skill fields (id, name, prompt) preserved across the round trip.
jsboige
pushed a commit
to jsboige/hermes-agent
that referenced
this pull request
May 14, 2026
…search#18253) When the curator consolidates skill X into umbrella Y, any cron job that listed X in its skills field would fail to load X at run time — the scheduler logs a warning and skips it, so the scheduled job runs without the instructions it was scheduled to follow. cron.jobs.rewrite_skill_refs(consolidated, pruned) now updates jobs in-place: consolidated names route to the umbrella target (dedup when umbrella is already present), pruned names are dropped. agent.curator._write_run_report calls it after classification, best-effort so a cron-side failure never breaks the curator itself. Results are recorded in run.json (counts.cron_jobs_rewritten + full cron_rewrites payload), a separate cron_rewrites.json for convenience when jobs were touched, and a section in REPORT.md. Reported by @tombielecki.
jsboige
pushed a commit
to jsboige/hermes-agent
that referenced
this pull request
May 14, 2026
…ill links on rollback (NousResearch#18671) (NousResearch#18731) * fix(curator): authoritative absorbed_into declarations on skill delete Closes NousResearch#18671. The classification pipeline that feeds cron-ref rewriting used to infer consolidation vs pruning from two brittle signals: the curator model's post-hoc YAML summary block, and a substring heuristic scanning other tool calls for the removed skill's name. Both miss in real consolidations — the model forgets the YAML under reasoning pressure, and the heuristic misses when the umbrella's patch content describes the absorbed behavior abstractly instead of naming the old slug. When both miss, the skill falls through to 'no-evidence fallback' pruned, and NousResearch#18253's cron rewriter drops the cron ref entirely instead of mapping it to the umbrella. Same observable symptom as pre-NousResearch#18253: 'Skill(s) not found and skipped' at the next cron run. The fix makes the model declare intent at the moment of deletion. skill_manage(action='delete') now accepts absorbed_into: - absorbed_into='<umbrella>' -> consolidated, target must exist on disk - absorbed_into='' -> explicit prune, no forwarding target - missing -> legacy path, falls through to heuristic/YAML The curator reconciler reads these declarations off llm_meta.tool_calls BEFORE either the YAML block or the substring heuristic. Declaration wins. Fallback logic stays intact for backward compat with any caller (human or older curator conversation) that doesn't populate the arg. Changes - tools/skill_manager_tool.py: add absorbed_into param to skill_manage + _delete_skill. Validate target exists when non-empty. Reject absorbed_into=<self>. Wire through dispatcher + registry + schema. - agent/curator.py: new _extract_absorbed_into_declarations() walks tool calls for skill_manage(delete) with the arg. _reconcile_classification accepts absorbed_declarations= and treats them as authoritative. Curator prompt updated to require the arg on every delete. - Tests: 7 new skill_manager tests covering the tool contract (valid target, empty string, nonexistent target, self-reference, whitespace, backward compat, dispatcher plumbing). 11 new curator tests covering the extractor + authoritative reconciler path + mixed-legacy-and- declared runs. Validation - 307/307 targeted tests pass (curator + cron + skill_manager suites). - E2E NousResearch#18671 repro: 3 narrow skills, 1 umbrella, cron job referencing all 3. Model emits NO YAML block. Heuristic misses (patch prose doesn't name old slugs). Delete calls carry absorbed_into. Result: both PR skills correctly classified 'consolidated' + cron rewritten ['pr-review-format', 'pr-review-checklist', 'stale-junk'] -> ['hermes-agent-dev']; stale-junk pruned via absorbed_into=''. - E2E backward-compat: delete without absorbed_into, model emits YAML -> routed via existing 'model' source, cron still rewritten correctly. * feat(curator): capture + restore cron skill links across snapshot/rollback Before this, rolling back a curator run restored the skills tree but cron jobs still pointed at the umbrella skills the curator had rewritten them to. The user would see their old narrow skills back on disk but their cron jobs still configured with the merged umbrella — not actually 'back to how it was'. Snapshot side: snapshot_skills() now captures ~/.hermes/cron/jobs.json alongside the skills tarball, as cron-jobs.json. The manifest gets a new 'cron_jobs' block with {backed_up, jobs_count} so rollback (and the CLI confirm dialog) can surface what's in the snapshot. If jobs.json is missing/unreadable/malformed, snapshot proceeds without cron data — the skills backup is the core guarantee; cron is additive. Rollback side: after the skills extract succeeds, the new _restore_cron_skill_links() reconciles the backed-up jobs into the live jobs.json SURGICALLY. Only 'skills' and 'skill' fields are restored, and only on jobs matched by id. Everything else about a cron job — schedule, last_run_at, next_run_at, enabled, prompt, workdir, hooks — is live state the user or scheduler has modified since the snapshot; overwriting it would regress unrelated activity. Reconciliation rules: - Job in backup AND live, skills differ → skills restored. - Job in backup AND live, skills match → no-op. - Job in backup, NOT in live → skipped (user deleted it after snapshot; their choice is later than the snapshot). - Job in live, NOT in backup → untouched (user created it after snapshot). - Snapshot missing cron-jobs.json at all → rollback still succeeds, reports 'not captured' (older pre-feature snapshots keep working). Writes go through cron.jobs.save_jobs under the same _jobs_file_lock the scheduler uses, so rollback doesn't race tick(). Also: - hermes_cli/curator.py: rollback confirm dialog now shows 'cron jobs: N (will be restored for skill-link fields only)' when the snapshot has cron data, or 'not in snapshot (<reason>)' otherwise. - rollback()'s message string includes a 'cron links: ...' clause summarizing the reconciliation outcome. Tests - 9 new cases: snapshot-with-cron, snapshot-without-cron, malformed-json captured-as-raw, full rollback-restores-skills-and-cron, rollback touches only skill fields, rollback skips user-deleted jobs, rollback leaves user-created jobs untouched, rollback still works with pre-feature snapshot that has no cron-jobs.json, standalone unit test on _restore_cron_skill_links exercising the full report shape. Validation - 484/484 targeted tests pass (curator + cron + skill_manager suites). - E2E: real snapshot_skills, real cron rewrite, real rollback. Before: ['pr-review-format', 'pr-review-checklist', 'pr-triage-salvage']. After curator: ['hermes-agent-dev']. After rollback: ['pr-review-format', 'pr-review-checklist', 'pr-triage-salvage']. Non-skill fields (id, name, prompt) preserved across the round trip.
This was referenced May 15, 2026
dannyJ848
pushed a commit
to dannyJ848/hermes-agent
that referenced
this pull request
May 17, 2026
…search#18253) When the curator consolidates skill X into umbrella Y, any cron job that listed X in its skills field would fail to load X at run time — the scheduler logs a warning and skips it, so the scheduled job runs without the instructions it was scheduled to follow. cron.jobs.rewrite_skill_refs(consolidated, pruned) now updates jobs in-place: consolidated names route to the umbrella target (dedup when umbrella is already present), pruned names are dropped. agent.curator._write_run_report calls it after classification, best-effort so a cron-side failure never breaks the curator itself. Results are recorded in run.json (counts.cron_jobs_rewritten + full cron_rewrites payload), a separate cron_rewrites.json for convenience when jobs were touched, and a section in REPORT.md. Reported by @tombielecki.
dannyJ848
pushed a commit
to dannyJ848/hermes-agent
that referenced
this pull request
May 17, 2026
…ill links on rollback (NousResearch#18671) (NousResearch#18731) * fix(curator): authoritative absorbed_into declarations on skill delete Closes NousResearch#18671. The classification pipeline that feeds cron-ref rewriting used to infer consolidation vs pruning from two brittle signals: the curator model's post-hoc YAML summary block, and a substring heuristic scanning other tool calls for the removed skill's name. Both miss in real consolidations — the model forgets the YAML under reasoning pressure, and the heuristic misses when the umbrella's patch content describes the absorbed behavior abstractly instead of naming the old slug. When both miss, the skill falls through to 'no-evidence fallback' pruned, and NousResearch#18253's cron rewriter drops the cron ref entirely instead of mapping it to the umbrella. Same observable symptom as pre-NousResearch#18253: 'Skill(s) not found and skipped' at the next cron run. The fix makes the model declare intent at the moment of deletion. skill_manage(action='delete') now accepts absorbed_into: - absorbed_into='<umbrella>' -> consolidated, target must exist on disk - absorbed_into='' -> explicit prune, no forwarding target - missing -> legacy path, falls through to heuristic/YAML The curator reconciler reads these declarations off llm_meta.tool_calls BEFORE either the YAML block or the substring heuristic. Declaration wins. Fallback logic stays intact for backward compat with any caller (human or older curator conversation) that doesn't populate the arg. Changes - tools/skill_manager_tool.py: add absorbed_into param to skill_manage + _delete_skill. Validate target exists when non-empty. Reject absorbed_into=<self>. Wire through dispatcher + registry + schema. - agent/curator.py: new _extract_absorbed_into_declarations() walks tool calls for skill_manage(delete) with the arg. _reconcile_classification accepts absorbed_declarations= and treats them as authoritative. Curator prompt updated to require the arg on every delete. - Tests: 7 new skill_manager tests covering the tool contract (valid target, empty string, nonexistent target, self-reference, whitespace, backward compat, dispatcher plumbing). 11 new curator tests covering the extractor + authoritative reconciler path + mixed-legacy-and- declared runs. Validation - 307/307 targeted tests pass (curator + cron + skill_manager suites). - E2E NousResearch#18671 repro: 3 narrow skills, 1 umbrella, cron job referencing all 3. Model emits NO YAML block. Heuristic misses (patch prose doesn't name old slugs). Delete calls carry absorbed_into. Result: both PR skills correctly classified 'consolidated' + cron rewritten ['pr-review-format', 'pr-review-checklist', 'stale-junk'] -> ['hermes-agent-dev']; stale-junk pruned via absorbed_into=''. - E2E backward-compat: delete without absorbed_into, model emits YAML -> routed via existing 'model' source, cron still rewritten correctly. * feat(curator): capture + restore cron skill links across snapshot/rollback Before this, rolling back a curator run restored the skills tree but cron jobs still pointed at the umbrella skills the curator had rewritten them to. The user would see their old narrow skills back on disk but their cron jobs still configured with the merged umbrella — not actually 'back to how it was'. Snapshot side: snapshot_skills() now captures ~/.hermes/cron/jobs.json alongside the skills tarball, as cron-jobs.json. The manifest gets a new 'cron_jobs' block with {backed_up, jobs_count} so rollback (and the CLI confirm dialog) can surface what's in the snapshot. If jobs.json is missing/unreadable/malformed, snapshot proceeds without cron data — the skills backup is the core guarantee; cron is additive. Rollback side: after the skills extract succeeds, the new _restore_cron_skill_links() reconciles the backed-up jobs into the live jobs.json SURGICALLY. Only 'skills' and 'skill' fields are restored, and only on jobs matched by id. Everything else about a cron job — schedule, last_run_at, next_run_at, enabled, prompt, workdir, hooks — is live state the user or scheduler has modified since the snapshot; overwriting it would regress unrelated activity. Reconciliation rules: - Job in backup AND live, skills differ → skills restored. - Job in backup AND live, skills match → no-op. - Job in backup, NOT in live → skipped (user deleted it after snapshot; their choice is later than the snapshot). - Job in live, NOT in backup → untouched (user created it after snapshot). - Snapshot missing cron-jobs.json at all → rollback still succeeds, reports 'not captured' (older pre-feature snapshots keep working). Writes go through cron.jobs.save_jobs under the same _jobs_file_lock the scheduler uses, so rollback doesn't race tick(). Also: - hermes_cli/curator.py: rollback confirm dialog now shows 'cron jobs: N (will be restored for skill-link fields only)' when the snapshot has cron data, or 'not in snapshot (<reason>)' otherwise. - rollback()'s message string includes a 'cron links: ...' clause summarizing the reconciliation outcome. Tests - 9 new cases: snapshot-with-cron, snapshot-without-cron, malformed-json captured-as-raw, full rollback-restores-skills-and-cron, rollback touches only skill fields, rollback skips user-deleted jobs, rollback leaves user-created jobs untouched, rollback still works with pre-feature snapshot that has no cron-jobs.json, standalone unit test on _restore_cron_skill_links exercising the full report shape. Validation - 484/484 targeted tests pass (curator + cron + skill_manager suites). - E2E: real snapshot_skills, real cron rewrite, real rollback. Before: ['pr-review-format', 'pr-review-checklist', 'pr-triage-salvage']. After curator: ['hermes-agent-dev']. After rollback: ['pr-review-format', 'pr-review-checklist', 'pr-triage-salvage']. Non-skill fields (id, name, prompt) preserved across the round trip.
gweeteve
pushed a commit
to gweeteve/hermes-agent
that referenced
this pull request
Jun 2, 2026
…search#18253) When the curator consolidates skill X into umbrella Y, any cron job that listed X in its skills field would fail to load X at run time — the scheduler logs a warning and skips it, so the scheduled job runs without the instructions it was scheduled to follow. cron.jobs.rewrite_skill_refs(consolidated, pruned) now updates jobs in-place: consolidated names route to the umbrella target (dedup when umbrella is already present), pruned names are dropped. agent.curator._write_run_report calls it after classification, best-effort so a cron-side failure never breaks the curator itself. Results are recorded in run.json (counts.cron_jobs_rewritten + full cron_rewrites payload), a separate cron_rewrites.json for convenience when jobs were touched, and a section in REPORT.md. Reported by @tombielecki.
gweeteve
pushed a commit
to gweeteve/hermes-agent
that referenced
this pull request
Jun 2, 2026
…ill links on rollback (NousResearch#18671) (NousResearch#18731) * fix(curator): authoritative absorbed_into declarations on skill delete Closes NousResearch#18671. The classification pipeline that feeds cron-ref rewriting used to infer consolidation vs pruning from two brittle signals: the curator model's post-hoc YAML summary block, and a substring heuristic scanning other tool calls for the removed skill's name. Both miss in real consolidations — the model forgets the YAML under reasoning pressure, and the heuristic misses when the umbrella's patch content describes the absorbed behavior abstractly instead of naming the old slug. When both miss, the skill falls through to 'no-evidence fallback' pruned, and NousResearch#18253's cron rewriter drops the cron ref entirely instead of mapping it to the umbrella. Same observable symptom as pre-NousResearch#18253: 'Skill(s) not found and skipped' at the next cron run. The fix makes the model declare intent at the moment of deletion. skill_manage(action='delete') now accepts absorbed_into: - absorbed_into='<umbrella>' -> consolidated, target must exist on disk - absorbed_into='' -> explicit prune, no forwarding target - missing -> legacy path, falls through to heuristic/YAML The curator reconciler reads these declarations off llm_meta.tool_calls BEFORE either the YAML block or the substring heuristic. Declaration wins. Fallback logic stays intact for backward compat with any caller (human or older curator conversation) that doesn't populate the arg. Changes - tools/skill_manager_tool.py: add absorbed_into param to skill_manage + _delete_skill. Validate target exists when non-empty. Reject absorbed_into=<self>. Wire through dispatcher + registry + schema. - agent/curator.py: new _extract_absorbed_into_declarations() walks tool calls for skill_manage(delete) with the arg. _reconcile_classification accepts absorbed_declarations= and treats them as authoritative. Curator prompt updated to require the arg on every delete. - Tests: 7 new skill_manager tests covering the tool contract (valid target, empty string, nonexistent target, self-reference, whitespace, backward compat, dispatcher plumbing). 11 new curator tests covering the extractor + authoritative reconciler path + mixed-legacy-and- declared runs. Validation - 307/307 targeted tests pass (curator + cron + skill_manager suites). - E2E NousResearch#18671 repro: 3 narrow skills, 1 umbrella, cron job referencing all 3. Model emits NO YAML block. Heuristic misses (patch prose doesn't name old slugs). Delete calls carry absorbed_into. Result: both PR skills correctly classified 'consolidated' + cron rewritten ['pr-review-format', 'pr-review-checklist', 'stale-junk'] -> ['hermes-agent-dev']; stale-junk pruned via absorbed_into=''. - E2E backward-compat: delete without absorbed_into, model emits YAML -> routed via existing 'model' source, cron still rewritten correctly. * feat(curator): capture + restore cron skill links across snapshot/rollback Before this, rolling back a curator run restored the skills tree but cron jobs still pointed at the umbrella skills the curator had rewritten them to. The user would see their old narrow skills back on disk but their cron jobs still configured with the merged umbrella — not actually 'back to how it was'. Snapshot side: snapshot_skills() now captures ~/.hermes/cron/jobs.json alongside the skills tarball, as cron-jobs.json. The manifest gets a new 'cron_jobs' block with {backed_up, jobs_count} so rollback (and the CLI confirm dialog) can surface what's in the snapshot. If jobs.json is missing/unreadable/malformed, snapshot proceeds without cron data — the skills backup is the core guarantee; cron is additive. Rollback side: after the skills extract succeeds, the new _restore_cron_skill_links() reconciles the backed-up jobs into the live jobs.json SURGICALLY. Only 'skills' and 'skill' fields are restored, and only on jobs matched by id. Everything else about a cron job — schedule, last_run_at, next_run_at, enabled, prompt, workdir, hooks — is live state the user or scheduler has modified since the snapshot; overwriting it would regress unrelated activity. Reconciliation rules: - Job in backup AND live, skills differ → skills restored. - Job in backup AND live, skills match → no-op. - Job in backup, NOT in live → skipped (user deleted it after snapshot; their choice is later than the snapshot). - Job in live, NOT in backup → untouched (user created it after snapshot). - Snapshot missing cron-jobs.json at all → rollback still succeeds, reports 'not captured' (older pre-feature snapshots keep working). Writes go through cron.jobs.save_jobs under the same _jobs_file_lock the scheduler uses, so rollback doesn't race tick(). Also: - hermes_cli/curator.py: rollback confirm dialog now shows 'cron jobs: N (will be restored for skill-link fields only)' when the snapshot has cron data, or 'not in snapshot (<reason>)' otherwise. - rollback()'s message string includes a 'cron links: ...' clause summarizing the reconciliation outcome. Tests - 9 new cases: snapshot-with-cron, snapshot-without-cron, malformed-json captured-as-raw, full rollback-restores-skills-and-cron, rollback touches only skill fields, rollback skips user-deleted jobs, rollback leaves user-created jobs untouched, rollback still works with pre-feature snapshot that has no cron-jobs.json, standalone unit test on _restore_cron_skill_links exercising the full report shape. Validation - 484/484 targeted tests pass (curator + cron + skill_manager suites). - E2E: real snapshot_skills, real cron rewrite, real rollback. Before: ['pr-review-format', 'pr-review-checklist', 'pr-triage-salvage']. After curator: ['hermes-agent-dev']. After rollback: ['pr-review-format', 'pr-review-checklist', 'pr-triage-salvage']. Non-skill fields (id, name, prompt) preserved across the round trip.
Egavasyug
pushed a commit
to Egavasyug/hermes-agent
that referenced
this pull request
Jun 10, 2026
…search#18253) When the curator consolidates skill X into umbrella Y, any cron job that listed X in its skills field would fail to load X at run time — the scheduler logs a warning and skips it, so the scheduled job runs without the instructions it was scheduled to follow. cron.jobs.rewrite_skill_refs(consolidated, pruned) now updates jobs in-place: consolidated names route to the umbrella target (dedup when umbrella is already present), pruned names are dropped. agent.curator._write_run_report calls it after classification, best-effort so a cron-side failure never breaks the curator itself. Results are recorded in run.json (counts.cron_jobs_rewritten + full cron_rewrites payload), a separate cron_rewrites.json for convenience when jobs were touched, and a section in REPORT.md. Reported by @tombielecki.
Egavasyug
pushed a commit
to Egavasyug/hermes-agent
that referenced
this pull request
Jun 10, 2026
…ill links on rollback (NousResearch#18671) (NousResearch#18731) * fix(curator): authoritative absorbed_into declarations on skill delete Closes NousResearch#18671. The classification pipeline that feeds cron-ref rewriting used to infer consolidation vs pruning from two brittle signals: the curator model's post-hoc YAML summary block, and a substring heuristic scanning other tool calls for the removed skill's name. Both miss in real consolidations — the model forgets the YAML under reasoning pressure, and the heuristic misses when the umbrella's patch content describes the absorbed behavior abstractly instead of naming the old slug. When both miss, the skill falls through to 'no-evidence fallback' pruned, and NousResearch#18253's cron rewriter drops the cron ref entirely instead of mapping it to the umbrella. Same observable symptom as pre-NousResearch#18253: 'Skill(s) not found and skipped' at the next cron run. The fix makes the model declare intent at the moment of deletion. skill_manage(action='delete') now accepts absorbed_into: - absorbed_into='<umbrella>' -> consolidated, target must exist on disk - absorbed_into='' -> explicit prune, no forwarding target - missing -> legacy path, falls through to heuristic/YAML The curator reconciler reads these declarations off llm_meta.tool_calls BEFORE either the YAML block or the substring heuristic. Declaration wins. Fallback logic stays intact for backward compat with any caller (human or older curator conversation) that doesn't populate the arg. Changes - tools/skill_manager_tool.py: add absorbed_into param to skill_manage + _delete_skill. Validate target exists when non-empty. Reject absorbed_into=<self>. Wire through dispatcher + registry + schema. - agent/curator.py: new _extract_absorbed_into_declarations() walks tool calls for skill_manage(delete) with the arg. _reconcile_classification accepts absorbed_declarations= and treats them as authoritative. Curator prompt updated to require the arg on every delete. - Tests: 7 new skill_manager tests covering the tool contract (valid target, empty string, nonexistent target, self-reference, whitespace, backward compat, dispatcher plumbing). 11 new curator tests covering the extractor + authoritative reconciler path + mixed-legacy-and- declared runs. Validation - 307/307 targeted tests pass (curator + cron + skill_manager suites). - E2E NousResearch#18671 repro: 3 narrow skills, 1 umbrella, cron job referencing all 3. Model emits NO YAML block. Heuristic misses (patch prose doesn't name old slugs). Delete calls carry absorbed_into. Result: both PR skills correctly classified 'consolidated' + cron rewritten ['pr-review-format', 'pr-review-checklist', 'stale-junk'] -> ['hermes-agent-dev']; stale-junk pruned via absorbed_into=''. - E2E backward-compat: delete without absorbed_into, model emits YAML -> routed via existing 'model' source, cron still rewritten correctly. * feat(curator): capture + restore cron skill links across snapshot/rollback Before this, rolling back a curator run restored the skills tree but cron jobs still pointed at the umbrella skills the curator had rewritten them to. The user would see their old narrow skills back on disk but their cron jobs still configured with the merged umbrella — not actually 'back to how it was'. Snapshot side: snapshot_skills() now captures ~/.hermes/cron/jobs.json alongside the skills tarball, as cron-jobs.json. The manifest gets a new 'cron_jobs' block with {backed_up, jobs_count} so rollback (and the CLI confirm dialog) can surface what's in the snapshot. If jobs.json is missing/unreadable/malformed, snapshot proceeds without cron data — the skills backup is the core guarantee; cron is additive. Rollback side: after the skills extract succeeds, the new _restore_cron_skill_links() reconciles the backed-up jobs into the live jobs.json SURGICALLY. Only 'skills' and 'skill' fields are restored, and only on jobs matched by id. Everything else about a cron job — schedule, last_run_at, next_run_at, enabled, prompt, workdir, hooks — is live state the user or scheduler has modified since the snapshot; overwriting it would regress unrelated activity. Reconciliation rules: - Job in backup AND live, skills differ → skills restored. - Job in backup AND live, skills match → no-op. - Job in backup, NOT in live → skipped (user deleted it after snapshot; their choice is later than the snapshot). - Job in live, NOT in backup → untouched (user created it after snapshot). - Snapshot missing cron-jobs.json at all → rollback still succeeds, reports 'not captured' (older pre-feature snapshots keep working). Writes go through cron.jobs.save_jobs under the same _jobs_file_lock the scheduler uses, so rollback doesn't race tick(). Also: - hermes_cli/curator.py: rollback confirm dialog now shows 'cron jobs: N (will be restored for skill-link fields only)' when the snapshot has cron data, or 'not in snapshot (<reason>)' otherwise. - rollback()'s message string includes a 'cron links: ...' clause summarizing the reconciliation outcome. Tests - 9 new cases: snapshot-with-cron, snapshot-without-cron, malformed-json captured-as-raw, full rollback-restores-skills-and-cron, rollback touches only skill fields, rollback skips user-deleted jobs, rollback leaves user-created jobs untouched, rollback still works with pre-feature snapshot that has no cron-jobs.json, standalone unit test on _restore_cron_skill_links exercising the full report shape. Validation - 484/484 targeted tests pass (curator + cron + skill_manager suites). - E2E: real snapshot_skills, real cron rewrite, real rollback. Before: ['pr-review-format', 'pr-review-checklist', 'pr-triage-salvage']. After curator: ['hermes-agent-dev']. After rollback: ['pr-review-format', 'pr-review-checklist', 'pr-triage-salvage']. Non-skill fields (id, name, prompt) preserved across the round trip.
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Summary
After a curator consolidation run, cron jobs whose
skills[]referenced a consolidated or pruned skill now get auto-rewritten in-place so they keep loading the right instructions on their next run.Reported by @tombielecki: "If a cron job is used to schedule the execution of a skill, the curator consolidation doesn't update those references/invocations so the jobs might silently fail."
Root cause: the curator archives the old skill directory but has no knowledge of
~/.hermes/cron/jobs.json. The scheduler's per-skillskill_viewcall logs a warning and skips the missing skill, but the job still runs — without the instructions it was scheduled to follow.Changes
cron/jobs.py: newrewrite_skill_refs(consolidated, pruned)— loads jobs under the in-process lock, maps consolidated names → umbrella target (dedup when umbrella already present), drops pruned names, saves atomically via the existingsave_jobspath. Returns a per-job report.agent/curator.py:_write_run_reportcalls it after classification. Best-effort try/except — a cron-side failure never breaks the curator. Rewrite summary is recorded inrun.json(counts.cron_jobs_rewritten+ fullcron_rewritespayload), a separatecron_rewrites.jsonwhen jobs were touched, and a dedicated section inREPORT.md.skillfield) + 3 integration tests through_write_run_report.Validation
skill(single) field_apply_skill_fieldsE2E run with 4 real jobs + real
_write_run_report+ real disk I/O:sales-analyzer-job[sales-analyzer]→[business-metrics]deploy-check-job[deploy-check, unrelated]→[deployment-umbrella, unrelated]stale-skill-job[old-stale-thing]→[](pruned, dropped)[keep-me-alone]→ unchangedTargeted test run: 124/124 passed (
tests/agent/test_curator*.py+tests/cron/test_cron_script.py+tests/cron/test_rewrite_skill_refs.py).