Conversation
Member
vcunat
commented
Aug 25, 2022
- workflow docs: nixos.org/manual/nixpkgs/unstable/#submitting-changes-commit-policy
- important job(s): hydra.nixos.org/job/nixpkgs/staging-next/unstable#tabs-constituents
- jobset: hydra.nixos.org/jobset/nixpkgs/staging-next
- nix-review reports: https://malob.github.io/nix-review-tools-reports/
- previous staging-next: staging-next 2022-08-16 #186941
for openssl 3.x support
it's the default now
I can't think of any good reason it was the way it was before. I think CMake can be made to install the headers too, but this is a fine first step.
gcc stopped using libelf in commit 48215350c24 ("re PR lto/46273 (Failed
to bootstrap)") around 2010, before gcc-4.6.0.
The current `gpgme` expression ignores the `doCheck` parameter because upstream's `Makefile` runs the tests automatically as part of the `buildPhase`. Let's run the tests as part of the `checkPhase` iff `doCheck` is set, like the rest of nixpkgs' packages. In particular, with this commit, `pkgsCross.*.gpgme` will no longer attempt to run the tests (tests are not supposed to be run when host!=build).
xz: 5.2.5 -> 5.2.6
bluez: 5.64 -> 5.65
llvmPackages*.libunwind: Don't redo install phase from scratch
The patch url went 404 and other distros¹ have discarded it as well in favor of packaging nss-pem² [1] https://gitweb.gentoo.org/repo/gentoo.git/commit/dev-libs/nss?id=5eca3e02c87163b3c541cdee893830d201abfb86 [2] https://github.com/kdudka/nss-pem
It's usefulness is not clear to us maintainers.
bluez: remove unused fetchpatch import
...into staging-next
13 tasks
Member
Author
|
This was referenced Sep 12, 2022
Member
|
I just accidentally merged this. Looking at the overview it does not seem to block anything.
We could disable the test file for aarch64-darwin to unblock it. |
Member
Author
|
Merge at this point was most likely OK-ish. |
Member
Author
|
Uh... you merged it the other way. So that |
13 tasks
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
20 participants
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.