Restore ability to use vocab language different from project language#613
Merged
Restore ability to use vocab language different from project language#613
Conversation
|
Kudos, SonarCloud Quality Gate passed!
|
Codecov Report
@@ Coverage Diff @@
## master #613 +/- ##
=======================================
Coverage 99.58% 99.58%
=======================================
Files 87 87
Lines 5840 5850 +10
=======================================
+ Hits 5816 5826 +10
Misses 24 24
Help us with your feedback. Take ten seconds to tell us how you rate us. Have a feature suggestion? Share it here. |
Member
Author
|
I think this is good enough for now. Need to get moving with the |
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
1 participant
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
The ability to use a vocabulary language different from the project language was implemented in PR #600, but subsequently broken by mistake in PR #608. For example, it should be possible to use
vocab=lcsh(en)in a project withlanguage=fiwhere all documents are in Finnish but English language labels are used for LCSH concepts (which don't even have Finnish labels) both when reading corpora and outputting results.This PR aims to restore that functionality by making sure that
Currently there are unit tests to verify item 2. above, but not 1. or 3.
Also some of the test vocabularies were renamed and repurposed to better match current needs.