Skip to content

Address SAM issue 1184#1055

Merged
sjanzou merged 4 commits into
developfrom
SAM_1184
Sep 26, 2023
Merged

Address SAM issue 1184#1055
sjanzou merged 4 commits into
developfrom
SAM_1184

Conversation

@sjanzou

@sjanzou sjanzou commented Sep 22, 2023

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Collaborator

No description provided.

@sjanzou sjanzou self-assigned this Sep 22, 2023
@sjanzou sjanzou requested a review from mjprilliman September 22, 2023 10:18
@sjanzou sjanzou linked an issue Sep 22, 2023 that may be closed by this pull request
"subarray2_enable" : 0,
"subarray2_modules_per_string" : 0,
"subarray2_nstrings" : 0,
"subarray2_modules_per_string" : 1,

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Collaborator

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Is this going to effect default requirements as well? I.E. will subarray2_modules_per_string have to be set to 1 rather than 0 on case load even though subarray 2 is not enabled? Right now the default Detailed PV cases will fail with subarray 2-4 nstrings and modules_per_string set to 0. Guess it's a logical next step to update those defaults to allow SAM to still run when another subarray is added without extra steps.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

Var table prechecks

2 participants