Adding partial failure detector model#209
Merged
Merged
Conversation
bmeyers
approved these changes
Oct 21, 2025
bmeyers
left a comment
Collaborator
There was a problem hiding this comment.
This is ready once we have passing tests
bmeyers
requested changes
Oct 24, 2025
bmeyers
left a comment
Collaborator
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Move standard imports (besides xgboost) back to top of file in detector_model.py
bmeyers
approved these changes
Oct 24, 2025
cocosrv
pushed a commit
to cocosrv/solar-data-tools
that referenced
this pull request
Nov 5, 2025
Adding partial failure detector model
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
This PR is implementing the anomaly detector presented as the 2025 pvsc.
Anomaly_detection_in_PV_fleet_data_via_interpretable_machine_learning.pdf
Checklist for PR authors (skip items if you don't have permissions or they are not applicable)