Greptile Summary

Updates the shields.io "Tokens Generated" badge in README.md from 350+ Billion to 400+ Billion. This is a single-line documentation change with no impact on code or tests.

• Changed the ![Tokens] badge URL parameter 350+_Billion → 400+_Billion on line 4 of README.md.

Important Files Changed

_{Reviews (1): Last reviewed commit: "docs: update generated token badge" | Re-trigger Greptile}

PR #678 Review: docs: update generated token badge

Summary

This PR updates a single shields.io badge in README.md to reflect a new tokens-generated milestone, bumping the displayed count from 350+ Billion to 400+ Billion. It is a one-line, README-only change with no code or behavioral impact.

Findings

Correctness

• The diff replaces only the badge label text (350+_Billion → 400+_Billion); the badge URL structure, color (76b900), logo, and surrounding markdown are preserved. ✅
• The badge is a static shields.io image (not a dynamic counter), so the value is a manually maintained marketing figure. As long as 400+ Billion is the intended new floor, the change is accurate. No way to verify the underlying number from the diff alone — assumed correct per author intent.

Style / Conventions

• Commit title docs: update generated token badge follows the repo's conventional-commit style seen in recent history (e.g., docs: update generated token badge already appeared in b463b57c).
• Note: the most recent commit on main (b463b57c docs: update generated token badge) has an identical title. Worth confirming this isn't a duplicate of an already-merged change, or that the new commit message distinguishes the bump (e.g., docs: bump generated token badge to 400B). Minor — non-blocking.

Performance / Security

• No runtime, build, or dependency impact. No security surface.

Test Coverage

• N/A. README-only, no testable logic. The PR's own checklist correctly marks test items as not applicable.

Suggestions (optional, non-blocking)

• Consider a more descriptive commit message (docs: bump tokens-generated badge to 400B) to differentiate from the prior identical-titled commit in git history.
• If this badge is updated on a regular cadence, it might be worth a short note in a CONTRIBUTING/maintenance doc on where the count comes from — but that's well outside the scope of this PR.

Verdict

Approve. Trivial documentation change, low risk, correctly scoped. No blockers. The only nit is that the commit title duplicates a recent commit on main; tightening the wording would help future git log readability but is not required.