Loss adjustment widget fixes#1408
Merged
Merged
Conversation
* Make default text match text in widget implementation to make it less confusing for UI developers
* Automatically set descriptive text based on context * Change "hourly" to "time series" in labels * Add text describing how total loss is combined from constant, time series, custom periods * Delete old commented-out code * Change text that appears on UI form to not show average time series loss to avoid confusion
sjanzou
approved these changes
May 25, 2023
sjanzou
left a comment
Collaborator
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Tested and works with ssc pull request 1028
tyneises
approved these changes
May 25, 2023
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Description
Fixes #1407
Type of change
Please delete options that are not relevant.
Checklist:
If you have added a new compute module in a SSC pull request related to this one, be sure to check the Process Requirements.