Skip to content

chore(release): sync stable to main for version 7.77.2#30457

Merged
metamaskbotv2[bot] merged 11 commits into
mainfrom
stable-main-7.77.0
May 20, 2026
Merged

chore(release): sync stable to main for version 7.77.2#30457
metamaskbotv2[bot] merged 11 commits into
mainfrom
stable-main-7.77.0

Conversation

@metamaskbotv2

@metamaskbotv2 metamaskbotv2 Bot commented May 20, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

This PR syncs the stable branch to main for version 7.77.0.

Synchronization Process:

  • Fetches the latest changes from the remote repository
  • Resets the branch to match the stable branch
  • Attempts to merge changes from main into the branch
  • Handles merge conflicts if they occur

File Preservation:

Preserves specific files from the stable branch:

  • CHANGELOG.md
  • bitrise.yml
  • android/app/build.gradle
  • ios/MetaMask.xcodeproj/project.pbxproj
  • package.json

Indicates the next version candidate of main to 7.77.0

metamaskbot and others added 11 commits May 20, 2026 06:14
…7.2-ota for PR #30407 (#30423)

- chore: bump @metamask/transaction-pay-controller from ^22.5.0 to
^22.6.1 (#30407)

## **Description**

Bump `@metamask/transaction-pay-controller` from `^22.5.0` to `^22.6.1`.

## **Changelog**

CHANGELOG entry: null

## **Related issues**

## **Manual testing steps**

## **Screenshots/Recordings**

### **Before**

### **After**

## **Pre-merge author checklist**

- [x] I've followed [MetaMask Contributor
Docs](https://github.com/MetaMask/contributor-docs) and [MetaMask Mobile
Coding

Standards](https://github.com/MetaMask/metamask-mobile/blob/main/.github/guidelines/CODING_GUIDELINES.md).
- [x] I've completed the PR template to the best of my ability
- [x] I've included tests if applicable
- [x] I've documented my code using [JSDoc](https://jsdoc.app/) format
if applicable
- [x] I've applied the right labels on the PR (see [labeling

guidelines](https://github.com/MetaMask/metamask-mobile/blob/main/.github/guidelines/LABELING_GUIDELINES.md)).
Not required for external contributors.

#### Performance checks (if applicable)

- [ ] I've tested on Android
- [ ] I've tested with a power user scenario
- [ ] I've instrumented key operations with Sentry traces for production
performance metrics

## **Pre-merge reviewer checklist**

- [ ] I've manually tested the PR (e.g. pull and build branch, run the
app, test code being changed).
- [ ] I confirm that this PR addresses all acceptance criteria described
in the ticket it closes and includes the necessary testing evidence such
as recordings and or screenshots.

<!-- CURSOR_SUMMARY -->
---

> [!NOTE]
> **Medium Risk**
> Updates a core payments/transaction dependency and refreshes several
related MetaMask controller packages, which could subtly affect
transaction/bridge behavior at runtime despite being a version bump
only.
> 
> **Overview**
> Bumps **`@metamask/transaction-pay-controller`** from `^22.5.0` to
`^22.6.1` in `package.json` and updates `yarn.lock` accordingly.
> 
> The lockfile refresh also pulls newer related controller versions
(notably `@metamask/bridge-controller`,
`@metamask/bridge-status-controller`, `@metamask/gas-fee-controller`,
and `@metamask/transaction-controller`), aligning transitive
dependencies with the updated pay controller.
> 
> <sup>Reviewed by [Cursor Bugbot](https://cursor.com/bugbot) for commit
3b7622d. Bugbot is set up for automated
code reviews on this repo. Configure
[here](https://www.cursor.com/dashboard/bugbot).</sup>
<!-- /CURSOR_SUMMARY -->
[72e0e00](72e0e00)

---------

Co-authored-by: Matthew Walsh <matthew.walsh@consensys.net>
Co-authored-by: chloeYue <105063779+chloeYue@users.noreply.github.com>
Reset yarn.lock and .yarn/patches to v7.77.0 (in addition to package.json)
before generating the fingerprint, so the OTA fingerprint guard matches the
base ref even after the @metamask/transaction-pay-controller bump and its
JS-only yarn patch landed on this branch.

Co-authored-by: Cursor <cursoragent@cursor.com>
## **Description**

Add the `[7.77.2]` section to `CHANGELOG.md` for the `v7.77.2` OTA
hotfix.



## **Changelog**

CHANGELOG entry: null

## **Related issues**

Fixes:

Co-authored-by: Cursor <cursoragent@cursor.com>
<!--
Please submit this PR as a draft initially.

Do not mark it as "Ready for review" until this PR meets the canonical
Definition of Ready For Review in `docs/readme/ready-for-review.md`.

In short: the template must be materially complete (not just section
titles
present), all status checks must be currently passing, and the only
expected
follow-up commits must be reviewer-driven.
-->

## **Description**

<!--
Write a short description of the changes included in this pull request,
also include relevant motivation and context. Have in mind the following
questions:
1. What is the reason for the change?
2. What is the improvement/solution?
-->

## **Changelog**

<!--
If this PR is not End-User-Facing and should not show up in the
CHANGELOG, you can choose to either:
1. Write `CHANGELOG entry: null`
2. Label with `no-changelog`

If this PR is End-User-Facing, please write a short User-Facing
description in the past tense like:
`CHANGELOG entry: Added a new tab for users to see their NFTs`
`CHANGELOG entry: Fixed a bug that was causing some NFTs to flicker`

(This helps the Release Engineer do their job more quickly and
accurately)
-->

CHANGELOG entry: null

## **Related issues**

Fixes:

## **Manual testing steps**

```gherkin
Feature: my feature name

  Scenario: user [verb for user action]
    Given [describe expected initial app state]

    When user [verb for user action]
    Then [describe expected outcome]
```

## **Screenshots/Recordings**

<!-- If applicable, add screenshots and/or recordings to visualize the
before and after of your change. -->

### **Before**

<!-- [screenshots/recordings] -->

### **After**

<!-- [screenshots/recordings] -->

## **Pre-merge author checklist**

<!--
Every checklist item must be consciously assessed before marking this PR
as
"Ready for review". A checked box means you deliberately considered that
responsibility, not that you literally performed every action listed.

Unchecked boxes are ambiguous: they are not an implicit "N/A" and they
are not
a silent "skip". See `docs/readme/ready-for-review.md` for the full
checklist
semantics.
-->

- [ ] I've followed [MetaMask Contributor
Docs](https://github.com/MetaMask/contributor-docs) and [MetaMask Mobile
Coding
Standards](https://github.com/MetaMask/metamask-mobile/blob/main/.github/guidelines/CODING_GUIDELINES.md).
- [ ] I've completed the PR template to the best of my ability
- [ ] I've included tests if applicable
- [ ] I've documented my code using [JSDoc](https://jsdoc.app/) format
if applicable
- [ ] I've applied the right labels on the PR (see [labeling
guidelines](https://github.com/MetaMask/metamask-mobile/blob/main/.github/guidelines/LABELING_GUIDELINES.md)).
Not required for external contributors.

#### Performance checks (if applicable)

- [ ] I've tested on Android
  - Ideally on a mid-range device; emulator is acceptable
- [ ] I've tested with a power user scenario
- Use these [power-user
SRPs](https://consensyssoftware.atlassian.net/wiki/spaces/TL1/pages/edit-v2/401401446401?draftShareId=9d77e1e1-4bdc-4be1-9ebb-ccd916988d93)
to import wallets with many accounts and tokens
- [ ] I've instrumented key operations with Sentry traces for production
performance metrics
- See [`trace()`](/app/util/trace.ts) for usage and
[`addToken`](/app/components/Views/AddAsset/components/AddCustomToken/AddCustomToken.tsx#L274)
for an example

For performance guidelines and tooling, see the [Performance
Guide](https://consensyssoftware.atlassian.net/wiki/spaces/TL1/pages/400085549067/Performance+Guide+for+Engineers).

## **Pre-merge reviewer checklist**

<!--
Reviewer checklist items follow the same semantics as the author
checklist: an
unchecked box is ambiguous, a checked box means the reviewer consciously
assessed that responsibility. See `docs/readme/ready-for-review.md`.
-->

- [ ] I've manually tested the PR (e.g. pull and build branch, run the
app, test code being changed).
- [ ] I confirm that this PR addresses all acceptance criteria described
in the ticket it closes and includes the necessary testing evidence such
as recordings and or screenshots.

<!-- CURSOR_SUMMARY -->
---

> [!NOTE]
> **Medium Risk**
> Patches `@metamask/transaction-pay-controller` logic that determines
Relay/Aggregator handling for Hyperliquid perps deposits; mistakes here
could misroute deposit transactions or affect quote requirements. Scope
is small and limited to transaction type classification plus
release-version bumps.
> 
> **Overview**
> Fixes Hyperliquid perps `deposit-and-order` transactions being treated
differently from standard perps deposits by introducing
`PERPS_DEPOSIT_TYPES` (covers `perpsDeposit` and `perpsDepositAndOrder`)
and using it wherever Relay deposit type mapping and Hyperliquid deposit
detection/quote requirements are determined.
> 
> Ships the fix via a Yarn patch to
`@metamask/transaction-pay-controller@22.5.0`, and bumps release
metadata (`CHANGELOG.md` entry for `7.77.2`, `app/constants/ota.ts` OTA
version, plus `package.json`/`yarn.lock` to pin the patched dependency).
> 
> <sup>Reviewed by [Cursor Bugbot](https://cursor.com/bugbot) for commit
5cb0c1d. Bugbot is set up for automated
code reviews on this repo. Configure
[here](https://www.cursor.com/dashboard/bugbot).</sup>
<!-- /CURSOR_SUMMARY -->
@github-actions

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

CLA Signature Action: All authors have signed the CLA. You may need to manually re-run the blocking PR check if it doesn't pass in a few minutes.

@github-actions github-actions Bot added the pr-not-ready-for-e2e Skip E2E and block merging. Remove this label once the PR is ready to run the E2E tests. label May 20, 2026
@metamaskbotv2 metamaskbotv2 Bot added the team-bots Bot team (for MetaMask Bot, Runway Bot, etc.) label May 20, 2026
@chloeYue chloeYue removed the pr-not-ready-for-e2e Skip E2E and block merging. Remove this label once the PR is ready to run the E2E tests. label May 20, 2026
@chloeYue chloeYue changed the title release: sync stable to main for version 7.77.0 release: sync stable to main for version 7.77.2 May 20, 2026
@chloeYue chloeYue changed the title release: sync stable to main for version 7.77.2 chore(release): sync stable to main for version 7.77.2 May 20, 2026

@chloeYue chloeYue left a comment

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

LGTM

@sonarqubecloud

Copy link
Copy Markdown

@chloeYue

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Merge my PR

@metamaskbotv2 metamaskbotv2 Bot merged commit bc8ce2d into main May 20, 2026
84 of 112 checks passed
@metamaskbotv2 metamaskbotv2 Bot deleted the stable-main-7.77.0 branch May 20, 2026 16:18
@github-actions github-actions Bot locked and limited conversation to collaborators May 20, 2026
@metamaskbotv2 metamaskbotv2 Bot added the release-7.79.0 Issue or pull request that will be included in release 7.79.0 label May 20, 2026
Sign up for free to subscribe to this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in.

Labels

release-7.79.0 Issue or pull request that will be included in release 7.79.0 size-XS team-bots Bot team (for MetaMask Bot, Runway Bot, etc.)

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants