Please address the comments from this code review:

## Overall Comments
- In `ClearHitCountAction.Run`, empty node names are only checked by `nodeName == ""`; consider trimming whitespace so names like `"  "` are also treated as invalid.
- When some nodes fail to clear but `strict` is `false`, the action still logs errors; if partial failure is expected in this mode, consider downgrading those logs to warning or info to reduce noise in normal operation.

## Individual Comments

### Comment 1
<location path="docs/zh_cn/developers/custom-action.md" line_range="64" />
<code_context>
+- **注意事项**
+    - 节点按 `nodes` 数组顺序依次清除计数，某个节点清除失败不影响其他节点的清除。
+    - 节点名称必须与 Pipeline 中定义的节点名称完全一致。
+    - 节点不存在或从未被执行过时，清除操作会失败。
+    - 当 `strict: false` 时，即使部分节点清除失败，action 也会返回成功，适用于清理可能不存在的可选节点。
+    - 当 `strict: true` 时，任一节点清除失败都会导致 action 返回失败，适用于关键节点的计数清理。
</code_context>
<issue_to_address>
**question:** Clarify whether the Chinese description should match the English condition (“recognized successfully” vs “executed”).

The English text says “Clearing a node will fail if the node does not exist or has never been recognized successfully,” while the Chinese reads “节点不存在或从未被执行过时，清除操作会失败.” These differ (“recognized successfully” vs “executed”). Please confirm the intended behavior and update one language so they describe the same condition.
</issue_to_address>