delete Compiler.jl versions v0.0.1~v0.0.3 and register v0.0.0 only#130304
Merged
DilumAluthge merged 2 commits intoJuliaRegistries:masterfrom May 7, 2025
Merged
delete Compiler.jl versions v0.0.1~v0.0.3 and register v0.0.0 only#130304DilumAluthge merged 2 commits intoJuliaRegistries:masterfrom
DilumAluthge merged 2 commits intoJuliaRegistries:masterfrom
Conversation
Contributor
|
I don't have enough insights about what could or should be done in this case but I will object that the title is misleading. This is not yanking but deletion. Yanking is a specific term which means adding a |
Contributor
Author
|
Thanks, I changed the title. |
edfe379 to
4a6619f
Compare
4a6619f to
8765729
Compare
Member
|
I discussed this on Slack with @aviatesk and Kristoffer. |
This was referenced May 9, 2025
aviatesk
added a commit
to aviatesk/General
that referenced
this pull request
May 14, 2025
In JuliaRegistries#130304 I proposed naming the placeholder version of the Compiler stdlib “v0.0.0” and made changes accordingly. However, after further discussions around adjusting Pkg.jl (c.f. JuliaLang/PKg..jl#4233), we decided to call it “v0.1.0” instead since the idea may sound to be an abuse of semver and that versioning wouldn't be able to handle cases when any changes to the implementation of that special version are needed in the future. As a result, this commit removes. v0.0.0 and releasing v0.1.0. Since BaseCompiler.jl is a very internal, special package that doesn’t yet follow proper versioning, there’s no need to worry about ecosystem impact from this change.
KristofferC
pushed a commit
that referenced
this pull request
May 14, 2025
In #130304 I proposed naming the placeholder version of the Compiler stdlib “v0.0.0” and made changes accordingly. However, after further discussions around adjusting Pkg.jl (c.f. JuliaLang/PKg..jl#4233), we decided to call it “v0.1.0” instead since the idea may sound to be an abuse of semver and that versioning wouldn't be able to handle cases when any changes to the implementation of that special version are needed in the future. As a result, this commit removes. v0.0.0 and releasing v0.1.0. Since BaseCompiler.jl is a very internal, special package that doesn’t yet follow proper versioning, there’s no need to worry about ecosystem impact from this change.
aviatesk
added a commit
to JuliaLang/julia
that referenced
this pull request
May 15, 2025
In JuliaRegistries/General#130304 I proposed naming the placeholder version of the Compiler stdlib "v0.0.0" and made changes accordingly. However, after further discussions around adjusting Pkg.jl (c.f. JuliaLang/Pkg.jl#4233), we decided to call it "v0.1.0" instead since the idea may sound to be an abuse of semver and that versioning wouldn't be able to handle cases when any changes to the implementation of that special version are needed in the future. As a result, this commit changes the version of the Compiler.jl stdlib implementation maintained in the base from v0.0.0 to v0.1.0. Since BaseCompiler.jl is a very internal, special package that doesn’t yet follow proper versioning, there’s no need to worry about ecosystem impact from this change.
aviatesk
added a commit
to JuliaLang/julia
that referenced
this pull request
May 15, 2025
In JuliaRegistries/General#130304 I proposed naming the placeholder version of the Compiler stdlib "v0.0.0" and made changes accordingly. However, after further discussions around adjusting Pkg.jl (c.f. JuliaLang/Pkg.jl#4233), we decided to call it "v0.1.0" instead since the idea may sound to be an abuse of semver and that versioning wouldn't be able to handle cases when any changes to the implementation of that special version are needed in the future. As a result, this commit changes the version of the Compiler.jl stdlib implementation maintained in the base from v0.0.0 to v0.1.0. Since BaseCompiler.jl is a very internal, special package that doesn’t yet follow proper versioning, there’s no need to worry about ecosystem impact from this change.
aviatesk
added a commit
to JuliaLang/julia
that referenced
this pull request
Jun 16, 2025
In JuliaRegistries/General#130304 I proposed naming the placeholder version of the Compiler stdlib "v0.0.0" and made changes accordingly. However, after further discussions around adjusting Pkg.jl (c.f. JuliaLang/Pkg.jl#4233), we decided to call it "v0.1.0" instead since the idea may sound to be an abuse of semver and that versioning wouldn't be able to handle cases when any changes to the implementation of that special version are needed in the future. As a result, this commit changes the version of the Compiler.jl stdlib implementation maintained in the base from v0.0.0 to v0.1.0. Since BaseCompiler.jl is a very internal, special package that doesn’t yet follow proper versioning, there’s no need to worry about ecosystem impact from this change.
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
3 participants
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
The management policy for the Compiler.jl stdlib is being changed, so this modification is required accordingly.
For more details, see JuliaLang/julia#57520 (comment).