More scalable pool allocator#50137
Merged
vchuravy merged 1 commit intoJuliaLang:masterfrom Jun 25, 2023
Merged
Conversation
vtjnash
reviewed
Jun 12, 2023
b01d688 to
369ced8
Compare
Member
|
With all the changes since the beginning, are the benchmarks still the same? |
65a2b4d to
2983c05
Compare
Member
Author
|
On 2983c05:
|
Member
|
that looks pretty good! |
vtjnash
reviewed
Jun 15, 2023
Member
Author
|
Seeing some regressions on this PR on the single-threaded benchmarks. Marking as draft until further investigated. |
Member
Author
|
Benchmarks look fine on the latest commit (the goal of this PR is be performance-neutral on the serial benchmarks and to provide better scalability when there are multiple threads allocating). Serial benchmarks (master)Serial benchmarks (PR)Multithreaded benchmarks (master)Multithreaded benchmarks (PR)Machine information |
4fe05fa to
acb4110
Compare
Collaborator
|
Your package evaluation job has completed - possible new issues were detected. |
vchuravy
approved these changes
Jun 25, 2023
Member
|
This made the |
Member
|
Yeah it's on my to-do list |
Member
Author
|
Also taking a look at this. |
vtjnash
reviewed
Jun 27, 2023
vtjnash
reviewed
Jun 27, 2023
vtjnash
reviewed
Jun 27, 2023
vtjnash
reviewed
Jun 28, 2023
vtjnash
reviewed
Jun 28, 2023
d-netto
added a commit
that referenced
this pull request
Jun 30, 2023
…ect pool freelist * addresses follow-up comments from #50137, particularly #50137 (comment)
d-netto
added a commit
to RelationalAI/julia
that referenced
this pull request
Aug 6, 2023
d-netto
added a commit
to RelationalAI/julia
that referenced
this pull request
Aug 6, 2023
kpamnany
pushed a commit
to RelationalAI/julia
that referenced
this pull request
Oct 19, 2023
DelveCI
pushed a commit
to RelationalAI/julia
that referenced
this pull request
Oct 20, 2023
kpamnany
pushed a commit
to RelationalAI/julia
that referenced
this pull request
Oct 21, 2023
DelveCI
pushed a commit
to RelationalAI/julia
that referenced
this pull request
Oct 23, 2023
DelveCI
pushed a commit
to RelationalAI/julia
that referenced
this pull request
Nov 1, 2023
DelveCI
pushed a commit
to RelationalAI/julia
that referenced
this pull request
Nov 2, 2023
DelveCI
pushed a commit
to RelationalAI/julia
that referenced
this pull request
Nov 7, 2023
DelveCI
pushed a commit
to RelationalAI/julia
that referenced
this pull request
Nov 10, 2023
DelveCI
pushed a commit
to RelationalAI/julia
that referenced
this pull request
Nov 14, 2023
DelveCI
pushed a commit
to RelationalAI/julia
that referenced
this pull request
Nov 15, 2023
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Still very experimental and depends on #49644. Mostly for later comparisons with #48969 (e.g. if concurrent sweeping would perform better on a potentially less contended pool allocator).
Seems to perform better than master on some multithreaded allocation benchmarks (e.g.
tree_mutable.jl), but a lot more benchmarking is needed: