Conversation
Codecov ReportPatch coverage:
Additional details and impacted files@@ Coverage Diff @@
## main #1093 +/- ##
=======================================
Coverage 90.40% 90.40%
=======================================
Files 9 9
Lines 2293 2294 +1
=======================================
+ Hits 2073 2074 +1
Misses 220 220
☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry. |
quinnj
left a comment
There was a problem hiding this comment.
This looks great @LilithHafner! Can I request one more change? We have the reading.md file where we try to spell out in detail all the various keyword args that are supported. Could you add an entry there for groupmark and if you're feeling ambitious, link to an example in the example.md file?
|
That's the kind of request that leads to well-documented packages. Thank you. |
|
After this PR, I am seeing a compile error in conjunction with Parsers 2.4.2, so I think Parsers compat needs to be bumped to 2.5. FWIW, it seems like the PR exposed a bug where the |
|
That is unfortunate—I imagine the best fix is the stop mixing up those arguments rather than restricting compat. Unfortunately, I do not have the bandwidth to debug that rn. Perhaps @quinnj is willing to look into it? |
|
Good catch @JackDunnNZ; mind making a PR to bump Parsers compat up to 2.5? |
* support groupmark * add more documentation --------- Co-authored-by: Lilith Hafner <Lilith.Hafner@gmail.com>
Closes #626. These features don't implement themselves, even when seven separate people comment asking for them.
See also JuliaData/Parsers.jl#168. This PR fixes none of that.
This is my first time working with this codebase and its style and I may have missed something. I'd appreciate a careful review.