Skip to content

Unnecessary other field tab#2002

Merged
Siedlerchr merged 3 commits into
JabRef:masterfrom
grimes2:otherfields
Sep 19, 2016
Merged

Unnecessary other field tab#2002
Siedlerchr merged 3 commits into
JabRef:masterfrom
grimes2:otherfields

Conversation

@grimes2

@grimes2 grimes2 commented Sep 17, 2016

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Switching Bibtex/Biblatex mode causes an unnecessary "other field" tab #1996, filled with optional fields, in entry editor. Other fields are defined as fields that are not required fields + optional fields. The bug is, that on switching database mode the wrong optional fields list is filled. This is fixed.

  • Change in CHANGELOG.md described
  • Tests created for changes
  • Screenshots added (for bigger UI changes)
  • Manually tested changed features in running JabRef
  • Check documentation status (Issue created for outdated help page at help.jabref.org?)

@Siedlerchr Siedlerchr added the status: ready-for-review Pull Requests that are ready to be reviewed by the maintainers label Sep 17, 2016
@lenhard

lenhard commented Sep 19, 2016

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

I have tested your PR with the help of the description in #1996 and everything works as desired. There is only one thing missing in this PR: Please add a Changelog entry and reference the issue that you fixed :)

It seems somewhat counter-intuitive that explicitly adding the optional fields makes the "other fields" tab disappear, but well... it's JabRef.

@Siedlerchr Siedlerchr merged commit d40f9f4 into JabRef:master Sep 19, 2016
@Siedlerchr

Siedlerchr commented Sep 19, 2016

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

Thanks for your contribution!
Fixes #1996

@grimes2 grimes2 deleted the otherfields branch September 20, 2016 10:16
Siedlerchr pushed a commit that referenced this pull request Sep 26, 2016
zesaro pushed a commit to zesaro/jabref that referenced this pull request Nov 22, 2016
* Optional fields list filled

* CHANGELOG.md
zesaro pushed a commit to zesaro/jabref that referenced this pull request Nov 22, 2016
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

status: ready-for-review Pull Requests that are ready to be reviewed by the maintainers

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants