Add some more JavaDoc#11400
Merged
Merged
Conversation
Contributor
|
The build for this PR is no longer available. Please visit https://builds.jabref.org/main/ for the latest build. |
Siedlerchr
approved these changes
Jun 20, 2024
6 tasks
Member
|
Maybe we should exclude database from hashcode? Because getUID also does not really solve the problem as two instances of bibdatabasecontext will never be "equal" as each one gets a new uid |
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
2 participants
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Follow-up to #11271
Side comment: I wonder why that PR fixed #8933. The
hashCodewas introduced at #10776, which was implemented after the issue appeared.Mandatory checks
CHANGELOG.mddescribed in a way that is understandable for the average user (if applicable)