Skip to content

Conversation

@palas
Copy link
Contributor

@palas palas commented Mar 18, 2025

Changelog

- description: |
    Add support for stake pool extended key
  type:
  - feature

Context

Tries to address #668.

Check together with: IntersectMBO/cardano-cli#1091

How to trust this PR

Look at the test for creating stake pool registration certificate using an extended cold key. Make sure the refactorings preserve the logic of the code and that the extensions make sense. Check the code structure is good and documentation is appropriate.

Checklist

  • Commit sequence broadly makes sense and commits have useful messages
  • New tests are added if needed and existing tests are updated. See Running tests for more details
  • Self-reviewed the diff

@palas palas added the enhancement New feature or request label Mar 18, 2025
@palas palas self-assigned this Mar 18, 2025
@palas palas force-pushed the add-pool-operator-extended-key-support branch 2 times, most recently from e5fe0be to 9aac6c3 Compare March 21, 2025 14:59
@palas palas linked an issue Mar 24, 2025 that may be closed by this pull request
@palas palas marked this pull request as ready for review March 24, 2025 16:17
@palas palas force-pushed the add-pool-operator-extended-key-support branch from 9aac6c3 to d68d3b5 Compare March 25, 2025 11:25
@palas palas force-pushed the add-pool-operator-extended-key-support branch from 6b13e0b to 1835032 Compare April 7, 2025 18:26
@palas palas requested a review from Jimbo4350 April 7, 2025 18:42
Copy link
Contributor

@Jimbo4350 Jimbo4350 left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Have you created an operational certificate with an extended key and tried to deserialise it from disk?

@palas palas force-pushed the add-pool-operator-extended-key-support branch from 7e83e51 to 2005d0c Compare April 22, 2025 08:45
@palas palas requested a review from Jimbo4350 April 22, 2025 10:33
Copy link
Contributor

@Jimbo4350 Jimbo4350 left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

@palas palas requested a review from Jimbo4350 April 23, 2025 10:28
Copy link
Contributor

@Jimbo4350 Jimbo4350 left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

LGTM! Squash the commits.

@palas palas force-pushed the add-pool-operator-extended-key-support branch from 2005d0c to a47eeb8 Compare April 23, 2025 19:41
@palas palas enabled auto-merge April 23, 2025 19:42
@palas palas added this pull request to the merge queue Apr 23, 2025
Merged via the queue into master with commit a10f917 Apr 23, 2025
29 checks passed
@palas palas deleted the add-pool-operator-extended-key-support branch April 23, 2025 21:17
gitmachtl added a commit to gitmachtl/CIPs that referenced this pull request May 13, 2025
https://cips.cardano.org/cip/CIP-0005 does not specify bech32 prefixes for extended pool operator keys. These were added to cardano-api with IntersectMBO/cardano-api#781 and part of cardano-cli with IntersectMBO/cardano-cli#1091 

This PR modifies CIP-0005 to define a standard set of prefixes for them.

Other changes:
- Added [https://github.com/gitmachtl/cardano-signer](cardano-signer) to the list of tools (acceptance criteria)
- Added an entry in the Changelog table
rphair pushed a commit to cardano-foundation/CIPs that referenced this pull request May 20, 2025
)

* CIP-0005 | Define bech32 prefixes for extended pool operator keys

https://cips.cardano.org/cip/CIP-0005 does not specify bech32 prefixes for extended pool operator keys. These were added to cardano-api with IntersectMBO/cardano-api#781 and part of cardano-cli with IntersectMBO/cardano-cli#1091 

This PR modifies CIP-0005 to define a standard set of prefixes for them.

Other changes:
- Added [https://github.com/gitmachtl/cardano-signer](cardano-signer) to the list of tools (acceptance criteria)
- Added an entry in the Changelog table

* Update README.md

* Edited the `Changelog table`  so IDs are in decreasing order (newest on top)
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

enhancement New feature or request

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

[FR] - Add extended Pool Operator Signing/Verification Key Types

3 participants