Do you think that the inset box pen thickness is universally too thin with 6.2.0rc1, or just in this case since the pen color is not very bold? If it's a universal problem, we could try to fix the auto-scaling on the GMT side before 6.2.0.

Do you think that the inset box pen thickness is universally too thin with 6.2.0rc1, or just in this case since the pen color is not very bold? If it's a universal problem, we could try to fix the auto-scaling on the GMT side before 6.2.0.

I agree that the inset box thickness is too thin on 6.2rc1, as it looks too thin on both the light yellow border and the black border in the tutorial examples.

Do you think that the inset box pen thickness is universally too thin with 6.2.0rc1, or just in this case since the pen color is not very bold? If it's a universal problem, we could try to fix the auto-scaling on the GMT side before 6.2.0.

So far, I only noticed it in this example.

Can't say I notice that much of a difference between red and red3, but I think thickening the inset border is a smart move.

It's not a big difference, only looks a little bit more modern in my opinion 😄 , however, we could also leave it as is.

FYI, the PR at GenericMappingTools/gmt#5265 will revert the default behavior for pen with +p to the 6.1 standard. Of course, this doesn't prevent setting it manually anyways as done here.