10:41:06.215: [AMF Encoder] Type | Acc.Type | Max Bitrate | Stream # | Max Profile | Max Level | BFrames | Ref. Frames | Layer # | FSM | Instance #
10:41:06.215: [AMF Encoder] AVC | Hardware | 100000000 | 16 | 100 | 52 | No | 1 - 16 | 1 | No | 1
10:41:06.215: [AMF Encoder] SVC | Hardware | 100000000 | 16 | 100 | 51 | No | 1 - 16 | 3 | No | 1
I get this result when querying the AMF Encoder for capabilities. The RX 480 has a newer VCE (sub-)generation, shouldn't it support BFrames like the R9 380/R9 285?
This is the output when I select the R9 285 (using the older SDK).
10:41:06.215: [AMF Encoder] Type | Acc.Type | Max Bitrate | Stream # | Max Profile | Max Level | BFrames | Ref. Frames | Layer # | FSM | Instance #
10:41:06.215: [AMF Encoder] AVC | Hardware | 1000000000 | 16 | 100 | 51 | Yes | 1 - 16 | 1 | No | 1
10:41:06.215: [AMF Encoder] SVC | Hardware | 1000000000 | 16 | 100 | 42 | Yes | 1 - 16 | 3 | No | 1
I get this result when querying the AMF Encoder for capabilities. The RX 480 has a newer VCE (sub-)generation, shouldn't it support BFrames like the R9 380/R9 285?
This is the output when I select the R9 285 (using the older SDK).