Skip to content

ci: pass --allow-dirty to shipper publish/resume too#568

Merged
EffortlessSteven merged 1 commit into
mainfrom
ci/shipper-publish-allow-dirty
May 11, 2026
Merged

ci: pass --allow-dirty to shipper publish/resume too#568
EffortlessSteven merged 1 commit into
mainfrom
ci/shipper-publish-allow-dirty

Conversation

@EffortlessSteven

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

Summary

#567 added `--allow-dirty` to `shipper preflight` but the live v0.7.0 publish run still failed at the publish step:

```
[1/53] Publishing uselesskey-aws-lc-rs@0.7.0... (1.533µs)
Error: git working tree is not clean; commit/stash changes or use --allow-dirty
```

`shipper publish` and `shipper resume` each do their own up-front git-cleanliness check. Add `--allow-dirty` to both in `release.yml` and `publish-retry.yml`.

The long-term hygiene fix (`.shipper/` in `.gitignore` via #567, or writing the plan to a path outside the workspace) already applies for v0.8.0+. This PR is the in-flight unblock for v0.7.0.

Test plan

  • CI green
  • Dispatch `publish-retry.yml` on v0.7.0 after merge — shipper publishes the remaining ~50 crates

#567 added --allow-dirty to `shipper preflight`, but the live publish
run still failed:

  [1/53] Publishing uselesskey-aws-lc-rs@0.7.0... (1.533µs)
  Error: git working tree is not clean; commit/stash changes or use --allow-dirty

`shipper publish` and `shipper resume` also check git cleanliness up-
front. Add `--allow-dirty` to both invocations in `release.yml` and
`publish-retry.yml` so the same `.shipper/plan.txt` output that the
Plan step writes via `tee` doesn't trip the subsequent commands.

This is the in-flight v0.7.0 unblock; the long-term fix (`.shipper/`
already gitignored in #567, optionally writing the plan to a path
outside the workspace) keeps applying from v0.8.0 onward.
@gemini-code-assist

Copy link
Copy Markdown

Warning

You have reached your daily quota limit. Please wait up to 24 hours and I will start processing your requests again!

@chatgpt-codex-connector

Copy link
Copy Markdown

You have reached your Codex usage limits for code reviews. You can see your limits in the Codex usage dashboard.
To continue using code reviews, add credits to your account and enable them for code reviews in your settings.

@coderabbitai

coderabbitai Bot commented May 11, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown

Warning

Rate limit exceeded

@EffortlessSteven has exceeded the limit for the number of commits that can be reviewed per hour. Please wait 29 minutes and 33 seconds before requesting another review.

You’ve run out of usage credits. Purchase more in the billing tab.

⌛ How to resolve this issue?

After the wait time has elapsed, a review can be triggered using the @coderabbitai review command as a PR comment. Alternatively, push new commits to this PR.

We recommend that you space out your commits to avoid hitting the rate limit.

🚦 How do rate limits work?

CodeRabbit enforces hourly rate limits for each developer per organization.

Our paid plans have higher rate limits than the trial, open-source and free plans. In all cases, we re-allow further reviews after a brief timeout.

Please see our FAQ for further information.

ℹ️ Review info
⚙️ Run configuration

Configuration used: Organization UI

Review profile: ASSERTIVE

Plan: Pro

Run ID: a24d86ec-80c8-4c67-8cb4-2dc0afdd78a0

📥 Commits

Reviewing files that changed from the base of the PR and between d53a481 and 8990773.

📒 Files selected for processing (2)
  • .github/workflows/publish-retry.yml
  • .github/workflows/release.yml
✨ Finishing Touches
🧪 Generate unit tests (beta)
  • Create PR with unit tests
  • Commit unit tests in branch ci/shipper-publish-allow-dirty

Thanks for using CodeRabbit! It's free for OSS, and your support helps us grow. If you like it, consider giving us a shout-out.

❤️ Share

Comment @coderabbitai help to get the list of available commands and usage tips.

@EffortlessSteven EffortlessSteven merged commit ec5956f into main May 11, 2026
5 checks passed
@EffortlessSteven EffortlessSteven deleted the ci/shipper-publish-allow-dirty branch May 11, 2026 11:08
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

1 participant