doc: updated roadmap and quick start#24
Conversation
|
Caution Review failedThe pull request is closed. Note Other AI code review bot(s) detectedCodeRabbit has detected other AI code review bot(s) in this pull request and will avoid duplicating their findings in the review comments. This may lead to a less comprehensive review. 📝 WalkthroughWalkthroughUpdated README.md: added "Running Manually", Docker, and Docker Compose instructions; clarified .env usage and API key requirements; introduced Pre-commit guidance; changed example model to Changes
Estimated code review effort🎯 2 (Simple) | ⏱️ ~12 minutes Possibly related PRs
Poem
Pre-merge checks and finishing touches✅ Passed checks (3 passed)
📜 Recent review detailsConfiguration used: Organization UI Review profile: ASSERTIVE Plan: Pro 📒 Files selected for processing (1)
Comment |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Actionable comments posted: 10
📜 Review details
Configuration used: Organization UI
Review profile: ASSERTIVE
Plan: Pro
📒 Files selected for processing (1)
README.md
🧰 Additional context used
🪛 LanguageTool
README.md
[style] ~61-~61: As an alternative to the over-used intensifier ‘really’, consider replacing this phrase.
Context: ...r", "content": "Hello!"}]}' ``` ### Really quick start With docker To be added... ## D...
(EN_WEAK_ADJECTIVE)
🔇 Additional comments (5)
README.md (5)
11-27: LGTM!The environment setup instructions are clear, well-structured with two practical options, and the note about minimum API key requirements is helpful.
90-97: LGTM!The pre-commit installation instructions are clear, well-documented, and include a helpful link to official documentation. Good addition to the development section.
11-27: LGTM!The environment setup is well-structured with two practical options and clear guidance about minimum API key requirements.
90-97: LGTM!The pre-commit installation instructions are clear and include a helpful link to official documentation.
104-104: No action needed—make buildtarget is properly defined in the Makefile (line 4) and declared in.PHONY. The command will execute successfully without errors.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Pull request overview
This PR updates the README documentation to enhance the Quick Start guide and expand the roadmap section. The changes reorganize content to improve clarity and add detailed feature tracking tables.
- Restructured Quick Start section with separate subsections for manual, Docker, and Docker Compose execution methods
- Added comprehensive roadmap tables tracking provider support, features, and integrations
- Moved Pre-commit setup guidance to the Development section
💡 Add Copilot custom instructions for smarter, more guided reviews. Learn how to get started.
README.md
Outdated
| | Feature | Basic support | Full support | | ||
| | -------------------------- | ----------------- | ----------------- | | ||
| | Billing Management | 🚧 Coming soon... | 🚧 Coming soon... | | ||
| | Full-observibility | 🚧 Coming soon... | 🚧 Coming soon... | |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
The word "observibility" is misspelled. The correct spelling is "observability".
| | Full-observibility | 🚧 Coming soon... | 🚧 Coming soon... | | |
| | Full-observability | 🚧 Coming soon... | 🚧 Coming soon... | |
| curl http://localhost:8080/v1/chat/completions \ | ||
| -H "Content-Type: application/json" \ | ||
| -d '{"model": "gpt-4o-mini", "messages": [{"role": "user", "content": "Hello!"}]}' | ||
| -d '{"model": "gpt-5-nano", "messages": [{"role": "user", "content": "Hello!"}]}' |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
The model name "gpt-5-nano" does not exist. As of January 2025, OpenAI has not released GPT-5 or any model called "gpt-5-nano". The previous value "gpt-4o-mini" was correct and should be retained, or use another valid OpenAI model like "gpt-4o" or "gpt-3.5-turbo".
| -d '{"model": "gpt-5-nano", "messages": [{"role": "user", "content": "Hello!"}]}' | |
| -d '{"model": "gpt-4o-mini", "messages": [{"role": "user", "content": "Hello!"}]}' |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Actionable comments posted: 2
📜 Review details
Configuration used: Organization UI
Review profile: ASSERTIVE
Plan: Pro
📒 Files selected for processing (1)
README.md
⏰ Context from checks skipped due to timeout of 90000ms. You can increase the timeout in your CodeRabbit configuration to a maximum of 15 minutes (900000ms). (1)
- GitHub Check: Analyze (go)
🔇 Additional comments (4)
README.md (4)
7-57: Good improvements to setup documentation.The "Running Manually" section is well-structured with clear step-by-step instructions, proper environment variable setup options, and working test examples. Properly addresses the previous feedback about heading clarity and placeholder content.
59-76: Docker section is complete and practical.The "Running with Docker" section provides clear, ready-to-use commands with proper documentation. Properly resolves the earlier placeholder issue.
111-118: Pre-commit section is clear and helpful.Good addition providing clear setup instructions with links to official documentation. This supports development best practices.
120-131: Supported Providers table is properly structured.The duplicate column header issue from the previous review is now resolved—the second occurrence is correctly labeled "Video gen" instead of duplicating "Image gen". All column headers are now unique and descriptive.
| ## Features | ||
|
|
||
| | Feature | Basic support | Full support | | ||
| | -------------------------- | ----------------- | ----------------- | | ||
| | Billing Management | 🚧 Coming soon... | 🚧 Coming soon... | | ||
| | Full-observibility | 🚧 Coming soon... | 🚧 Coming soon... | | ||
| | Budget management | 🚧 Coming soon... | 🚧 Coming soon... | | ||
| | Many keys support | 🚧 Coming soon... | 🚧 Coming soon... | | ||
| | Administrative endpoints | 🚧 Coming soon... | 🚧 Coming soon... | | ||
| | Guardrails | 🚧 Coming soon... | 🚧 Coming soon... | | ||
| | SSO | 🚧 Coming soon... | 🚧 Coming soon... | | ||
| | System Prompt (GuardRails) | 🚧 Coming soon... | 🚧 Coming soon... | | ||
|
|
||
| ## Integrations | ||
|
|
||
| | Integration | Basic integration | Full support | | ||
| | ------------- | ----------------- | ----------------- | | ||
| | Prometheus | ✅ | 🚧 Coming soon... | | ||
| | DataDog | 🚧 Coming soon... | 🚧 Coming soon... | | ||
| | OpenTelemetry | 🚧 Coming soon... | 🚧 Coming soon... | |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
🧹 Nitpick | 🔵 Trivial
Clarify roadmap sections to set user expectations about feature availability.
The Features and Integrations tables display primarily "Coming soon" items. While appropriate for a roadmap document, consider clarifying that these sections represent planned features, not current capabilities. Currently, the headers "## Features" and "## Integrations" may suggest these are available today.
A simple improvement: add a brief introductory line before each section (e.g., "### Features (Roadmap)" or "The following features are planned for future releases:") to clearly distinguish current support from planned work.
🤖 Prompt for AI Agents
In README.md around lines 133 to 152, the "Features" and "Integrations" sections
currently list mostly "Coming soon" items and can be misread as available now;
add a single clarifying sentence or change the section headers to indicate these
are planned/roadmap items (e.g., "Features (Roadmap)" or "The following features
are planned for future releases:") before each table so readers clearly
understand these entries are not yet implemented.
Summary by CodeRabbit
✏️ Tip: You can customize this high-level summary in your review settings.