Skip to content

Conversation

@QilongTang
Copy link
Contributor

@QilongTang QilongTang commented May 5, 2020

Please Note:

  1. Before submitting the PR, please review How to Contribute to Dynamo
  2. Dynamo Team will meet 1x a month to review PRs found on Github (Issues will be handled separately)
  3. PRs will be reviewed from oldest to newest
  4. If a reviewed PR requires changes by the owner, the owner of the PR has 30 days to respond. If the PR has seen no activity by the next session, it will be either closed by the team or depending on its utility will be taken over by someone on the team
  5. PRs should use either Dynamo's default PR template or one of these other template options in order to be considered for review.
  6. PRs that do not have one of the Dynamo PR templates completely filled out with all declarations satisfied will not be reviewed by the Dynamo team.
  7. PRs made to the DynamoRevit repo will need to be cherry-picked into all the DynamoRevit Release branches that Dynamo supports. Contributors will be responsible for cherry-picking their reviewed commits to the other branches after a LGTM label is added to the PR.

Purpose

@pinzart Please help on this, after merging the debug modes changes, I found it is not a singleton under DynamoModel or view model, do I have to deserialize it before I can use it in the code?

Declarations

Check these if you believe they are true

  • The codebase is in a better state after this PR
  • Is documented according to the standards
  • The level of testing this PR includes is appropriate
  • User facing strings, if any, are extracted into *.resx files
  • All tests pass using the self-service CI.
  • Snapshot of UI changes, if any.
  • Changes to the API follow Semantic Versioning and are documented in the API Changes document.

Reviewers

@DynamoDS/dynamo

FYIs

@pinzart

@QilongTang QilongTang added the WIP label May 5, 2020
// Example:
// AddDebugMode("TestDebugMode", "Enabe/disable TestDebugMode.");
// Register app wide new debug modes here.
AddDebugMode("Python3DebugMode", "Enabe/disable Python3DebugMode.");
Copy link
Contributor Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

@pinzart I have registered a new Debug mode for our Python3 feature and added a debug.config file in Dynamo root. Curious how to reference it?

Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

You can use if (DebugModes.Enabled("Python3DebugMode") == true) to check if your debug mode is enabled or not.

As a side note...I put the DebugModes class in DynamoCore...in the hopes that all other Projects in Dynamo can include the Dynamo.Configuration namespace ...in order to have access to DebugModes.

Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

as for the Description section of the DebugMode...It only helps to figure out what the feature is, behind the debug mode. This is only visible in the DebugModes UI.
You can leave out the fact that it is a debug mode ....Like Enable/Disable Python 3 Engine....or something like that..
Anyway...it's a description...you can put anything you want theere...

Copy link
Contributor Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

@pinzart Adding the name space may not help since I am using the reference in a different dll here, I had to add internally visible to key word. See my changes

@pinzart
Copy link
Contributor

pinzart commented May 5, 2020

@QilongTang The DebugModes class is basically a static class...
Please add the static modifier to the class to make it more obvious.

@QilongTang QilongTang changed the title [WIP] Python3 Selection Under Debug Modes Python3 Selection Under Debug Modes May 5, 2020
@QilongTang QilongTang added PTAL Please Take A Look 👀 and removed WIP labels May 5, 2020
@QilongTang
Copy link
Contributor Author

@DynamoDS/dynamo @pinzart Did some clean up from my point of view, PTAL

Copy link
Contributor

@pinzart pinzart left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Thanks for the code changes @QilongTang
LGTM

Copy link
Collaborator

@mmisol mmisol left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Looks good. Just a comment regarding the TODO but not related to the PR itself.

if (Engine == PythonEngineVersion.CPython3)
{
// TODO: Uncomment this and replace the following code when merging Python3 changes in master
// pythonEvaluatorMethod = DSCPython.CPythonEvaluator.EvaluatePythonScript;
Copy link
Collaborator

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

It would be nice to add this in the AC of whatever task will merge the Python3 branch into master. Otherwise we may forget to do this.

@pinzart
Copy link
Contributor

pinzart commented May 5, 2020

@QilongTang you should be able to add tests that Enable the Python3 DebugMode at the beginning of the test...(then disable at the end-- so it does not interfere with the rest of the tests)
DebugModes.SetDebugModeEnabled("SomeDbugMode", true)
test...code
DebugModes.SetDebugModeEnabled("SomeDbugMode", false)

@QilongTang QilongTang merged commit 0cdd190 into master May 6, 2020
@QilongTang QilongTang deleted the Python3UnderDebugModes branch May 6, 2020 16:17
reddyashish added a commit that referenced this pull request May 14, 2020
* add namespace conflict tests for short name replacer and node to code (#10611)

* Register custom node before package load reset (#10591)

This fixes a problem where existing custom nodes in the home workspace
became unresolved after a package that contained binaries was loaded.

The cause of the problem was that the compiled function was not
available at the time of the execution after a VM reset. Now the data
is registered on package load, by queueing it in
pendingCustomNodeSyncData. This results in a CompileCustomNodeAsyncTask
being scheduled before the update of the home workspace graph takes
place.

* Increase coverage of the Core folder (#10609)

* Add a test for the CrashPromptArgs class

* Update DynamoCoreTests.csproj

* Added NotificationObject tests

* Updated the test, NotificationObject coverage at 100%

* Changed some access modifiers

* Added coverage for Updates/BinaryVersion

* Added comments and fixed names

* Revert "Added comments and fixed names"

This reverts commit 42cd024.

* Revert "Added coverage for Updates/BinaryVersion"

This reverts commit 679deca.

* Increased coverage in CrashPromptArgs

* Added some Core coverage

* DYN-2560 - Increase the code coverage: DynamoCore/Models Folder First Part (#10612)

* DYN-2560 - Increase the code coverage: DynamoCore/Models Folder

I started adding just one test method TestOnRequestDispatcherBeginInvoke() for testing the DynamoModelEvents class.

* DYN-2560 - Adding test cases for DynamoModelEvents

Adding test cases for DynamoModelEvents

* DYN-2560 - Adding test cases for DynamoModelEvents

I added all the test cases for the all events  in the DynamoModelEvent class, i just need to fix the last 6 of them.

* DYN-2560 - Adding test cases for DynamoModelEventsArgs

I added several test cases for the classes inside the DynamoModelEventsArgs.cs file.

     ZoomEventArgs
     TaskDialogEventArgs
     EvaluationCompletedEventArgs
     DynamoModelUpdateArgs
     FunctionNamePromptEventArgs
     PresetsNamePromptEventArgs
     ViewOperationEventArgs
     PointEventArgs
     WorkspaceEventArgs
     ModelEventArgs

* DYN-2560 - Code Review Comments

Based in the comment done by Aaron in the GitHub pull request, I added more description comments for the method TestTaskDialogEventArgs() and also I added comments for a local function

* DYN-2560 - Code Review Comments 2

There was a spelling error in two methods for the word "Internally", then I fixed this error in the two places.

* Python Engine Enum (#10618)

* Cherrypick

* Comments

* Add unit test

* Comments

* Handle runtime table gaps on code block deletion (#10605)

When the runtime table are built there is an implicit assumption that
the code block ids are consecutive. However, that is not always the
case, as the deletion of a procedure causes the deletion of its child
code blocks, which may generate gaps in the id numbering.

In order to make the code resiliant to these gaps, the runtime tables
are sized based on the largest code block id, rather than in the amount
of code blocks.

* Validate ASM installations before loading (#10621)

The check for the specific assemblies tbb.dll and tbbmalloc.dll is
generalized to a full file list validation of detected ASM locations.
This way, Dynamo is guarded against any incomplete/unusual ASM binary
folders that other applications might include.

The lists of files for each version were taken from LibG. They cannot
be reused from LibG without involving major changes in the preloader,
so the lists should be kept in sync as new major release of ASM occur.

* SQ bug fix (#10622)

* (1) Null reference bug fix from SQ dashboard

* Add support for debug modes (#10603)

* Add support for debug modes

* Increase coverage of the Updates folder (#10628)

* Add a test for the CrashPromptArgs class

* Update DynamoCoreTests.csproj

* Added NotificationObject tests

* Updated the test, NotificationObject coverage at 100%

* Changed some access modifiers

* Added coverage for Updates/BinaryVersion

* Added comments and fixed names

* Added asserts for happy path, changed namespace and deleted a console function

* Removed using

* Revert "Removed using"

This reverts commit 022823d.

* Removed a change that should not be there

* Added coverage for Updates folder

* Tests for CPython3 Engine as well as for IronPython.

* [WIP][FEEDBACK] Reduce test time by substantially reducing number of serialization tests. (#10624)

* reduce number of serialization tests by factor 3~

* reduce wpf json serialization tests

* Handle missing instance calling method statically (#10630)

A code block node calling an instance method in its static form would
make Dynamo crash if the instance was not provided. An example of this
would be calling 'Curve.Patch();'.

The cause of the issue was that the default argument was ultimately
tried to be interpreted as a pointer. By avoiding that wrong conversion
the engine is now able to surface the real problem as a human-readable
warning.

* Python3 Selection Under Debug Modes (#10629)

* Cherrypick Python3 changes

* Cleanup

* Use Debug Modes

* CleanUp

* Rename Function

* Clean Up

* Do not use anouymous function as handler

* Revert newer language change

* Add adp analytics to Dynamo (#10576)

* add ADPTracker register

* Fix non-array item search for dot operation (#10633)

When an array is passed to the dot operation, it needs to get an item
to determine the actual class being processed. This was done in
ArrayUtils.GetFirstNonArrayStackValue, but the function only checked
the first item of the array and its descendants. This caused the dot
operation to failed when passed an array that contained an empty array
as its first item.

In order to fix the problem, the function was changed to check for
non-array items in the entire array. The function should stop as soon
as the first non-array item is found.

* Addressing some comments

* some more comments

* Update AssemblyInfo.cs

* Update AssemblyInfo.cs

* Marking the python node as modified when its engine property is modified

Also updated some tests.

* Remove unwanted check.

* changes to test

* Update AssemblySharedInfo.cs

* Using python engine's AcquireLock to avoid deadlock.

The deadlock was happening only when multiple PythonEngine's are initialized on a thread from 2 different test fixtures in the same run.
The main difference is calling this function PythonEngine.BeginAllowThreads().
Also we do not want to initialze the python engine if it is already initialized.

Co-authored-by: aparajit-pratap <aparajit.pratap@autodesk.com>
Co-authored-by: Martin Misol Monzo <mmisol@users.noreply.github.com>
Co-authored-by: Bruno Yorda <34453173+byorda-glb@users.noreply.github.com>
Co-authored-by: Roberto T <61755417+RobertGlobant20@users.noreply.github.com>
Co-authored-by: Aaron (Qilong) <173288704@qq.com>
Co-authored-by: Ashish Aggarwal <aggarwal.ash@husky.neu.edu>
Co-authored-by: Tibi <tiberiu.pinzariu@autodesk.com>
Co-authored-by: Michael Kirschner <mjk.kirschner@gmail.com>
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

PTAL Please Take A Look 👀

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

5 participants