review comments#1
Closed
erendrake wants to merge 2 commits intoDunbaratu:Fixes_925_accidental_lowercasingfrom
Closed
review comments#1erendrake wants to merge 2 commits intoDunbaratu:Fixes_925_accidental_lowercasingfrom
erendrake wants to merge 2 commits intoDunbaratu:Fixes_925_accidental_lowercasingfrom
Conversation
Author
There was a problem hiding this comment.
unrelated change that i keep meaning to make separate. its not needed anymore because the folder has files in it now
Author
|
I really just wanted to put this here so you could see what i did. |
Dunbaratu
pushed a commit
that referenced
this pull request
May 27, 2015
Dunbaratu
pushed a commit
that referenced
this pull request
Feb 29, 2016
Artwork source files cleanup and additions
Dunbaratu
added a commit
that referenced
this pull request
Jul 1, 2018
Change #1: AddTrigger opcode will now treat steering lock triggers as the same if they come from the same point in the program, like they're supposed to (and like they used to do). My pilot.ks program was bogging down very very slowly, to about 3 FPS with the new interrupt priority code. I found the cause: When a program did ``lock throttle`` in a loop, like so: ``` until false { lock throttle to 1. wait 0. } ``` Then each time the "lock throttle" statement was visited, it would insert a NEW trigger for it because it failed to recognize that the previous one was already pending in the trigger list. (The Equals() test was calling it a new trigger, because it was getting a new instance ID in the OpcodeTrigger.Execute() logic. Because it wasn't "Equal" to the existing one, the uniqueness test for inserting a trigger failed to deny the insertion.) Therefore after the program runs a while instead of having like 1 throttle trigger there were hundreds of them, clogging the execution, and making the trigger logic itself rather slow (doing sequential walks through the trigger lists between each opcode with hundreds of triggers in the list instead of typically about 10-ish like there should be in a typical program). Change #2: The new logic on how triggers move from the active list to the callstack means they no longer execute in reverse order because they don't all get stacked up at once (instead they move over one at a time, waiting for the prev one to finish, unless a higher priority one is there that is supposed to stack on top). What this means is that when moving from the trigger list to the stack, it shouldn't be doing so in reverse order like it used to.
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
No description provided.