[react] Fix link to React profiler API documentation#52735
[react] Fix link to React profiler API documentation#52735typescript-bot merged 3 commits intoDefinitelyTyped:masterfrom
Conversation
|
Hey @intgr, 😒 Your PR doesn't modify any tests, so it's hard to know what's being fixed, and your changes might regress in the future. Please consider adding tests to cover the change you're making. Including tests allows this PR to be merged by yourself and the owners of this module. This can potentially save days of time for you. |
|
@intgr Thank you for submitting this PR! I see this is your first time submitting to DefinitelyTyped 👋 — I'm the local bot who will help you through the process of getting things through. This is a live comment which I will keep updated. 1 package in this PRCode ReviewsThis PR can be merged once it's reviewed. Status
All of the items on the list are green. To merge, you need to post a comment including the string "Ready to merge" to bring in your changes. Diagnostic Information: What the bot saw about this PR{
"type": "info",
"now": "-",
"pr_number": 52735,
"author": "intgr",
"headCommitOid": "031654b79a9c85a47fb2cdf9106d8e092789639b",
"lastPushDate": "2021-05-04T09:09:26.000Z",
"lastActivityDate": "2021-05-04T20:30:56.000Z",
"maintainerBlessed": true,
"mergeOfferDate": "2021-05-04T19:26:13.000Z",
"mergeRequestDate": "2021-05-04T20:30:56.000Z",
"mergeRequestUser": "intgr",
"hasMergeConflict": false,
"isFirstContribution": true,
"tooManyFiles": false,
"popularityLevel": "Critical",
"pkgInfo": [
{
"name": "react",
"kind": "edit",
"files": [
{
"path": "types/react/index.d.ts",
"kind": "definition"
},
{
"path": "types/react/v16/index.d.ts",
"kind": "definition"
}
],
"owners": [
"johnnyreilly",
"bbenezech",
"pzavolinsky",
"digiguru",
"ericanderson",
"DovydasNavickas",
"theruther4d",
"guilhermehubner",
"ferdaber",
"jrakotoharisoa",
"pascaloliv",
"hotell",
"franklixuefei",
"Jessidhia",
"saranshkataria",
"lukyth",
"eps1lon",
"zieka",
"dancerphil",
"dimitropoulos",
"disjukr",
"vhfmag",
"hellatan"
],
"addedOwners": [],
"deletedOwners": [],
"popularityLevel": "Critical"
}
],
"reviews": [
{
"type": "approved",
"reviewer": "eps1lon",
"date": "2021-05-04T09:11:37.000Z",
"isMaintainer": false
}
],
"ciResult": "pass"
} |
|
🔔 @johnnyreilly @bbenezech @pzavolinsky @digiguru @ericanderson @DovydasNavickas @theruther4d @guilhermehubner @ferdaber @jrakotoharisoa @pascaloliv @Hotell @franklixuefei @Jessidhia @saranshkataria @lukyth @eps1lon @zieka @dancerphil @dimitropoulos @disjukr @vhfmag @hellatan — please review this PR in the next few days. Be sure to explicitly select |
eps1lon
left a comment
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Thanks! I would suggest we directly link to the onRender callback.
Co-authored-by: Sebastian Silbermann <silbermann.sebastian@gmail.com>
Co-authored-by: Sebastian Silbermann <silbermann.sebastian@gmail.com>
|
👋 Hi there! I’ve run some quick measurements against master and your PR. These metrics should help the humans reviewing this PR gauge whether it might negatively affect compile times or editor responsiveness for users who install these typings. Let’s review the numbers, shall we?
First off, note that the system varied slightly between these two runs, so you’ll have to take these measurements with a grain of salt. Looks like there were a couple significant differences—take a look at mean duration for getting completions at a position, mean duration for getting quick info at a position, and worst-case duration for getting quick info at a position to make sure everything looks ok. |
|
@intgr Everything looks good here. Great job! I am ready to merge this PR (at 031654b) on your behalf. If you'd like that to happen, please post a comment saying:
and I'll merge this PR almost instantly. Thanks for helping out! ❤️ (@johnnyreilly, @bbenezech, @pzavolinsky, @digiguru, @ericanderson, @DovydasNavickas, @theruther4d, @guilhermehubner, @ferdaber, @jrakotoharisoa, @pascaloliv, @Hotell, @franklixuefei, @Jessidhia, @saranshkataria, @lukyth, @eps1lon, @zieka, @dancerphil, @dimitropoulos, @disjukr, @vhfmag, @hellatan: you can do this too.) |
|
Ready to merge |
|
I just published |
|
I just published |
Please fill in this template.
npm test <package to test>.Select one of these and delete the others:
If adding a new definition:
.d.tsfiles generated via--declarationdts-gen --dt, not by basing it on an existing project.tslint.jsonshould contain{ "extends": "dtslint/dt.json" }, and no additional rules.tsconfig.jsonshould havenoImplicitAny,noImplicitThis,strictNullChecks, andstrictFunctionTypesset totrue.If changing an existing definition:
If removing a declaration:
notNeededPackages.json.