chore(release): proposal for libdd-sampling by dd-octo-sts[bot] · Pull Request #2065 · DataDog/libdatadog

dd-octo-sts · 2026-06-01T09:29:24Z

Release proposal for libdd-sampling and its dependencies

This PR contains version bumps based on public API changes and commits since last release.

libdd-trace-utils

Next version: 6.0.1
Semver bump: patch
Tag: libdd-trace-utils-v6.0.1

Commits

fix(otlp): propagate _dd.p.tid from chunk root to all spans (fix(otlp): propagate _dd.p.tid from chunk root to all spans #2014)

libdd-sampling (bumped manually as #2033 is a minor)

Next version: ~~2.0.1~~ 2.1.0
Semver bump: ~~patch~~ minor
Tag: ~~libdd-sampling-v2.0.1~~ libdd-sampling-v2.1.0

Commits

feat(sampling): accept Remote Config list-shape tags natively (feat(sampling): accept Remote Config list-shape tags natively #2033)

Co-authored-by: iunanua <18325288+iunanua@users.noreply.github.com>

github-actions · 2026-06-01T09:31:50Z

📚 Documentation Check Results

⚠️ 4074 documentation warning(s) found

📦 `libdd-data-pipeline` - 1058 warning(s)

📦 `libdd-sampling` - 178 warning(s)

📦 `libdd-trace-obfuscation` - 680 warning(s)

📦 `libdd-trace-stats` - 719 warning(s)

📦 `libdd-trace-utils` - 593 warning(s)

📦 `libdd-tracer-flare` - 846 warning(s)

Updated: 2026-06-01 09:40:24 UTC | Commit: 3bc808b | missing-docs job results

github-actions · 2026-06-01T09:33:16Z

🔒 Cargo Deny Results

⚠️ 26 issue(s) found, showing only errors (advisories, bans, sources)

📦 `libdd-data-pipeline` - 5 error(s)

Show output

error[unsound]: Rand is unsound with a custom logger using `rand::rng()`
    ┌─ /home/runner/work/libdatadog/libdatadog/Cargo.lock:214:1
    │
214 │ rand 0.8.5 registry+https://github.com/rust-lang/crates.io-index
    │ ━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━ unsound advisory detected
    │
    ├ ID: RUSTSEC-2026-0097
    ├ Advisory: https://rustsec.org/advisories/RUSTSEC-2026-0097
    ├ It has been reported (by @lopopolo) that the `rand` library is [unsound](https://rust-lang.github.io/unsafe-code-guidelines/glossary.html#soundness-of-code--of-a-library) (i.e. that safe code using the public API can cause Undefined Behaviour) when all the following conditions are met:
      
      - The `log` and `thread_rng` features are enabled
      - A [custom logger](https://docs.rs/log/latest/log/#implementing-a-logger) is defined
      - The custom logger accesses `rand::rng()` (previously `rand::thread_rng()`) and calls any `TryRng` (previously `RngCore`) methods on `ThreadRng`
      - The `ThreadRng` (attempts to) reseed while called from the custom logger (this happens every 64 kB of generated data)
      - Trace-level logging is enabled or warn-level logging is enabled and the random source (the `getrandom` crate) is unable to provide a new seed
      
      `TryRng` (previously `RngCore`) methods for `ThreadRng` use `unsafe` code to cast `*mut BlockRng<ReseedingCore>` to `&mut BlockRng<ReseedingCore>`. When all the above conditions are met this results in an aliased mutable reference, violating the Stacked Borrows rules. Miri is able to detect this violation in sample code. Since construction of [aliased mutable references is Undefined Behaviour](https://doc.rust-lang.org/stable/nomicon/references.html), the behaviour of optimized builds is hard to predict.
    ├ Announcement: https://github.com/rust-random/rand/pull/1763
    ├ Solution: Upgrade to >=0.10.1 OR <0.10.0, >=0.9.3 OR <0.9.0, >=0.8.6 (try `cargo update -p rand`)
    ├ rand v0.8.5
      ├── libdd-common v4.2.0
      │   ├── libdd-capabilities-impl v2.0.0
      │   │   ├── libdd-data-pipeline v5.0.0
      │   │   ├── libdd-shared-runtime v1.0.0
      │   │   │   ├── libdd-data-pipeline v5.0.0 (*)
      │   │   │   ├── libdd-telemetry v5.0.0
      │   │   │   │   └── libdd-data-pipeline v5.0.0 (*)
      │   │   │   └── libdd-trace-stats v4.0.0
      │   │   │       └── libdd-data-pipeline v5.0.0 (*)
      │   │   ├── libdd-trace-stats v4.0.0 (*)
      │   │   └── libdd-trace-utils v6.0.1
      │   │       ├── libdd-data-pipeline v5.0.0 (*)
      │   │       ├── libdd-trace-obfuscation v3.1.0
      │   │       │   └── libdd-trace-stats v4.0.0 (*)
      │   │       ├── libdd-trace-stats v4.0.0 (*)
      │   │       └── (dev) libdd-trace-utils v6.0.1 (*)
      │   ├── libdd-data-pipeline v5.0.0 (*)
      │   ├── libdd-dogstatsd-client v3.0.0
      │   │   └── libdd-data-pipeline v5.0.0 (*)
      │   ├── libdd-shared-runtime v1.0.0 (*)
      │   ├── libdd-telemetry v5.0.0 (*)
      │   ├── libdd-trace-obfuscation v3.1.0 (*)
      │   ├── libdd-trace-stats v4.0.0 (*)
      │   └── libdd-trace-utils v6.0.1 (*)
      ├── (dev) libdd-data-pipeline v5.0.0 (*)
      ├── (dev) libdd-trace-normalization v2.0.0
      │   └── libdd-trace-utils v6.0.1 (*)
      ├── (dev) libdd-trace-stats v4.0.0 (*)
      ├── libdd-trace-utils v6.0.1 (*)
      └── proptest v1.5.0
          └── (dev) libdd-tinybytes v1.1.1
              ├── libdd-data-pipeline v5.0.0 (*)
              ├── (dev) libdd-tinybytes v1.1.1 (*)
              └── libdd-trace-utils v6.0.1 (*)

error[vulnerability]: Name constraints for URI names were incorrectly accepted
    ┌─ /home/runner/work/libdatadog/libdatadog/Cargo.lock:238:1
    │
238 │ rustls-webpki 0.103.10 registry+https://github.com/rust-lang/crates.io-index
    │ ━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━ security vulnerability detected
    │
    ├ ID: RUSTSEC-2026-0098
    ├ Advisory: https://rustsec.org/advisories/RUSTSEC-2026-0098
    ├ Name constraints for URI names were ignored and therefore accepted.
      
      Note this library does not provide an API for asserting URI names, and URI name constraints are otherwise not implemented.  URI name constraints are now rejected unconditionally.
      
      Since name constraints are restrictions on otherwise properly-issued certificates, this bug is reachable only after signature verification and requires misissuance to exploit.
      
      This vulnerability is identified as [GHSA-965h-392x-2mh5](https://github.com/rustls/webpki/security/advisories/GHSA-965h-392x-2mh5). Thank you to @1seal for the report.
    ├ Solution: Upgrade to >=0.103.12, <0.104.0-alpha.1 OR >=0.104.0-alpha.6 (try `cargo update -p rustls-webpki`)
    ├ rustls-webpki v0.103.10
      └── rustls v0.23.37
          ├── hyper-rustls v0.27.7
          │   └── libdd-common v4.2.0
          │       ├── libdd-capabilities-impl v2.0.0
          │       │   ├── libdd-data-pipeline v5.0.0
          │       │   ├── libdd-shared-runtime v1.0.0
          │       │   │   ├── libdd-data-pipeline v5.0.0 (*)
          │       │   │   ├── libdd-telemetry v5.0.0
          │       │   │   │   └── libdd-data-pipeline v5.0.0 (*)
          │       │   │   └── libdd-trace-stats v4.0.0
          │       │   │       └── libdd-data-pipeline v5.0.0 (*)
          │       │   ├── libdd-trace-stats v4.0.0 (*)
          │       │   └── libdd-trace-utils v6.0.1
          │       │       ├── libdd-data-pipeline v5.0.0 (*)
          │       │       ├── libdd-trace-obfuscation v3.1.0
          │       │       │   └── libdd-trace-stats v4.0.0 (*)
          │       │       ├── libdd-trace-stats v4.0.0 (*)
          │       │       └── (dev) libdd-trace-utils v6.0.1 (*)
          │       ├── libdd-data-pipeline v5.0.0 (*)
          │       ├── libdd-dogstatsd-client v3.0.0
          │       │   └── libdd-data-pipeline v5.0.0 (*)
          │       ├── libdd-shared-runtime v1.0.0 (*)
          │       ├── libdd-telemetry v5.0.0 (*)
          │       ├── libdd-trace-obfuscation v3.1.0 (*)
          │       ├── libdd-trace-stats v4.0.0 (*)
          │       └── libdd-trace-utils v6.0.1 (*)
          ├── libdd-common v4.2.0 (*)
          └── tokio-rustls v0.26.0
              ├── hyper-rustls v0.27.7 (*)
              └── libdd-common v4.2.0 (*)

error[vulnerability]: Name constraints were accepted for certificates asserting a wildcard name
    ┌─ /home/runner/work/libdatadog/libdatadog/Cargo.lock:238:1
    │
238 │ rustls-webpki 0.103.10 registry+https://github.com/rust-lang/crates.io-index
    │ ━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━ security vulnerability detected
    │
    ├ ID: RUSTSEC-2026-0099
    ├ Advisory: https://rustsec.org/advisories/RUSTSEC-2026-0099
    ├ Permitted subtree name constraints for DNS names were accepted for certificates asserting a wildcard name.
      
      This was incorrect because, given a name constraint of `accept.example.com`, `*.example.com` could feasibly allow a name of `reject.example.com` which is outside the constraint.
      This is very similar to [CVE-2025-61727](https://go.dev/issue/76442).
      
      Since name constraints are restrictions on otherwise properly-issued certificates, this bug is reachable only after signature verification and requires misissuance to exploit.
      
      This vulnerability is identified as [GHSA-xgp8-3hg3-c2mh](https://github.com/rustls/webpki/security/advisories/GHSA-xgp8-3hg3-c2mh). Thank you to @1seal for the report.
    ├ Solution: Upgrade to >=0.103.12, <0.104.0-alpha.1 OR >=0.104.0-alpha.6 (try `cargo update -p rustls-webpki`)
    ├ rustls-webpki v0.103.10
      └── rustls v0.23.37
          ├── hyper-rustls v0.27.7
          │   └── libdd-common v4.2.0
          │       ├── libdd-capabilities-impl v2.0.0
          │       │   ├── libdd-data-pipeline v5.0.0
          │       │   ├── libdd-shared-runtime v1.0.0
          │       │   │   ├── libdd-data-pipeline v5.0.0 (*)
          │       │   │   ├── libdd-telemetry v5.0.0
          │       │   │   │   └── libdd-data-pipeline v5.0.0 (*)
          │       │   │   └── libdd-trace-stats v4.0.0
          │       │   │       └── libdd-data-pipeline v5.0.0 (*)
          │       │   ├── libdd-trace-stats v4.0.0 (*)
          │       │   └── libdd-trace-utils v6.0.1
          │       │       ├── libdd-data-pipeline v5.0.0 (*)
          │       │       ├── libdd-trace-obfuscation v3.1.0
          │       │       │   └── libdd-trace-stats v4.0.0 (*)
          │       │       ├── libdd-trace-stats v4.0.0 (*)
          │       │       └── (dev) libdd-trace-utils v6.0.1 (*)
          │       ├── libdd-data-pipeline v5.0.0 (*)
          │       ├── libdd-dogstatsd-client v3.0.0
          │       │   └── libdd-data-pipeline v5.0.0 (*)
          │       ├── libdd-shared-runtime v1.0.0 (*)
          │       ├── libdd-telemetry v5.0.0 (*)
          │       ├── libdd-trace-obfuscation v3.1.0 (*)
          │       ├── libdd-trace-stats v4.0.0 (*)
          │       └── libdd-trace-utils v6.0.1 (*)
          ├── libdd-common v4.2.0 (*)
          └── tokio-rustls v0.26.0
              ├── hyper-rustls v0.27.7 (*)
              └── libdd-common v4.2.0 (*)

error[vulnerability]: Reachable panic in certificate revocation list parsing
    ┌─ /home/runner/work/libdatadog/libdatadog/Cargo.lock:238:1
    │
238 │ rustls-webpki 0.103.10 registry+https://github.com/rust-lang/crates.io-index
    │ ━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━ security vulnerability detected
    │
    ├ ID: RUSTSEC-2026-0104
    ├ Advisory: https://rustsec.org/advisories/RUSTSEC-2026-0104
    ├ A panic was reachable when parsing certificate revocation lists via [`BorrowedCertRevocationList::from_der`]
      or [`OwnedCertRevocationList::from_der`].  This was the result of mishandling a syntactically valid empty
      `BIT STRING` appearing in the `onlySomeReasons` element of a `IssuingDistributionPoint` CRL extension.
      
      This panic is reachable prior to a CRL's signature being verified.
      
      Applications that do not use CRLs are not affected.
      
      Thank you to @tynus3 for the report.
    ├ Solution: Upgrade to >=0.103.13, <0.104.0-alpha.1 OR >=0.104.0-alpha.7 (try `cargo update -p rustls-webpki`)
    ├ rustls-webpki v0.103.10
      └── rustls v0.23.37
          ├── hyper-rustls v0.27.7
          │   └── libdd-common v4.2.0
          │       ├── libdd-capabilities-impl v2.0.0
          │       │   ├── libdd-data-pipeline v5.0.0
          │       │   ├── libdd-shared-runtime v1.0.0
          │       │   │   ├── libdd-data-pipeline v5.0.0 (*)
          │       │   │   ├── libdd-telemetry v5.0.0
          │       │   │   │   └── libdd-data-pipeline v5.0.0 (*)
          │       │   │   └── libdd-trace-stats v4.0.0
          │       │   │       └── libdd-data-pipeline v5.0.0 (*)
          │       │   ├── libdd-trace-stats v4.0.0 (*)
          │       │   └── libdd-trace-utils v6.0.1
          │       │       ├── libdd-data-pipeline v5.0.0 (*)
          │       │       ├── libdd-trace-obfuscation v3.1.0
          │       │       │   └── libdd-trace-stats v4.0.0 (*)
          │       │       ├── libdd-trace-stats v4.0.0 (*)
          │       │       └── (dev) libdd-trace-utils v6.0.1 (*)
          │       ├── libdd-data-pipeline v5.0.0 (*)
          │       ├── libdd-dogstatsd-client v3.0.0
          │       │   └── libdd-data-pipeline v5.0.0 (*)
          │       ├── libdd-shared-runtime v1.0.0 (*)
          │       ├── libdd-telemetry v5.0.0 (*)
          │       ├── libdd-trace-obfuscation v3.1.0 (*)
          │       ├── libdd-trace-stats v4.0.0 (*)
          │       └── libdd-trace-utils v6.0.1 (*)
          ├── libdd-common v4.2.0 (*)
          └── tokio-rustls v0.26.0
              ├── hyper-rustls v0.27.7 (*)
              └── libdd-common v4.2.0 (*)

error[vulnerability]: Denial of Service via Stack Exhaustion
    ┌─ /home/runner/work/libdatadog/libdatadog/Cargo.lock:278:1
    │
278 │ time 0.3.41 registry+https://github.com/rust-lang/crates.io-index
    │ ━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━ security vulnerability detected
    │
    ├ ID: RUSTSEC-2026-0009
    ├ Advisory: https://rustsec.org/advisories/RUSTSEC-2026-0009
    ├ ## Impact
      
      When user-provided input is provided to any type that parses with the RFC 2822 format, a denial of
      service attack via stack exhaustion is possible. The attack relies on formally deprecated and
      rarely-used features that are part of the RFC 2822 format used in a malicious manner. Ordinary,
      non-malicious input will never encounter this scenario.
      
      ## Patches
      
      A limit to the depth of recursion was added in v0.3.47. From this version, an error will be returned
      rather than exhausting the stack.
      
      ## Workarounds
      
      Limiting the length of user input is the simplest way to avoid stack exhaustion, as the amount of
      the stack consumed would be at most a factor of the length of the input.
    ├ Announcement: https://github.com/time-rs/time/blob/main/CHANGELOG.md#0347-2026-02-05
    ├ Solution: Upgrade to >=0.3.47 (try `cargo update -p time`)
    ├ time v0.3.41
      └── tracing-appender v0.2.3
          └── libdd-log v1.0.0
              └── (dev) libdd-data-pipeline v5.0.0

advisories FAILED, bans ok, sources ok

📦 `libdd-sampling` - 4 error(s)

Show output

error[unsound]: Rand is unsound with a custom logger using `rand::rng()`
   ┌─ /home/runner/work/libdatadog/libdatadog/Cargo.lock:94:1
   │
94 │ rand 0.8.5 registry+https://github.com/rust-lang/crates.io-index
   │ ━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━ unsound advisory detected
   │
   ├ ID: RUSTSEC-2026-0097
   ├ Advisory: https://rustsec.org/advisories/RUSTSEC-2026-0097
   ├ It has been reported (by @lopopolo) that the `rand` library is [unsound](https://rust-lang.github.io/unsafe-code-guidelines/glossary.html#soundness-of-code--of-a-library) (i.e. that safe code using the public API can cause Undefined Behaviour) when all the following conditions are met:
     
     - The `log` and `thread_rng` features are enabled
     - A [custom logger](https://docs.rs/log/latest/log/#implementing-a-logger) is defined
     - The custom logger accesses `rand::rng()` (previously `rand::thread_rng()`) and calls any `TryRng` (previously `RngCore`) methods on `ThreadRng`
     - The `ThreadRng` (attempts to) reseed while called from the custom logger (this happens every 64 kB of generated data)
     - Trace-level logging is enabled or warn-level logging is enabled and the random source (the `getrandom` crate) is unable to provide a new seed
     
     `TryRng` (previously `RngCore`) methods for `ThreadRng` use `unsafe` code to cast `*mut BlockRng<ReseedingCore>` to `&mut BlockRng<ReseedingCore>`. When all the above conditions are met this results in an aliased mutable reference, violating the Stacked Borrows rules. Miri is able to detect this violation in sample code. Since construction of [aliased mutable references is Undefined Behaviour](https://doc.rust-lang.org/stable/nomicon/references.html), the behaviour of optimized builds is hard to predict.
   ├ Announcement: https://github.com/rust-random/rand/pull/1763
   ├ Solution: Upgrade to >=0.10.1 OR <0.10.0, >=0.9.3 OR <0.9.0, >=0.8.6 (try `cargo update -p rand`)
   ├ rand v0.8.5
     └── (dev) libdd-common v4.2.0
         └── libdd-sampling v2.1.0

error[vulnerability]: Name constraints for URI names were incorrectly accepted
    ┌─ /home/runner/work/libdatadog/libdatadog/Cargo.lock:107:1
    │
107 │ rustls-webpki 0.103.10 registry+https://github.com/rust-lang/crates.io-index
    │ ━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━ security vulnerability detected
    │
    ├ ID: RUSTSEC-2026-0098
    ├ Advisory: https://rustsec.org/advisories/RUSTSEC-2026-0098
    ├ Name constraints for URI names were ignored and therefore accepted.
      
      Note this library does not provide an API for asserting URI names, and URI name constraints are otherwise not implemented.  URI name constraints are now rejected unconditionally.
      
      Since name constraints are restrictions on otherwise properly-issued certificates, this bug is reachable only after signature verification and requires misissuance to exploit.
      
      This vulnerability is identified as [GHSA-965h-392x-2mh5](https://github.com/rustls/webpki/security/advisories/GHSA-965h-392x-2mh5). Thank you to @1seal for the report.
    ├ Solution: Upgrade to >=0.103.12, <0.104.0-alpha.1 OR >=0.104.0-alpha.6 (try `cargo update -p rustls-webpki`)
    ├ rustls-webpki v0.103.10
      └── rustls v0.23.37
          ├── hyper-rustls v0.27.7
          │   └── libdd-common v4.2.0
          │       └── libdd-sampling v2.1.0
          ├── libdd-common v4.2.0 (*)
          └── tokio-rustls v0.26.0
              ├── hyper-rustls v0.27.7 (*)
              └── libdd-common v4.2.0 (*)

error[vulnerability]: Name constraints were accepted for certificates asserting a wildcard name
    ┌─ /home/runner/work/libdatadog/libdatadog/Cargo.lock:107:1
    │
107 │ rustls-webpki 0.103.10 registry+https://github.com/rust-lang/crates.io-index
    │ ━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━ security vulnerability detected
    │
    ├ ID: RUSTSEC-2026-0099
    ├ Advisory: https://rustsec.org/advisories/RUSTSEC-2026-0099
    ├ Permitted subtree name constraints for DNS names were accepted for certificates asserting a wildcard name.
      
      This was incorrect because, given a name constraint of `accept.example.com`, `*.example.com` could feasibly allow a name of `reject.example.com` which is outside the constraint.
      This is very similar to [CVE-2025-61727](https://go.dev/issue/76442).
      
      Since name constraints are restrictions on otherwise properly-issued certificates, this bug is reachable only after signature verification and requires misissuance to exploit.
      
      This vulnerability is identified as [GHSA-xgp8-3hg3-c2mh](https://github.com/rustls/webpki/security/advisories/GHSA-xgp8-3hg3-c2mh). Thank you to @1seal for the report.
    ├ Solution: Upgrade to >=0.103.12, <0.104.0-alpha.1 OR >=0.104.0-alpha.6 (try `cargo update -p rustls-webpki`)
    ├ rustls-webpki v0.103.10
      └── rustls v0.23.37
          ├── hyper-rustls v0.27.7
          │   └── libdd-common v4.2.0
          │       └── libdd-sampling v2.1.0
          ├── libdd-common v4.2.0 (*)
          └── tokio-rustls v0.26.0
              ├── hyper-rustls v0.27.7 (*)
              └── libdd-common v4.2.0 (*)

error[vulnerability]: Reachable panic in certificate revocation list parsing
    ┌─ /home/runner/work/libdatadog/libdatadog/Cargo.lock:107:1
    │
107 │ rustls-webpki 0.103.10 registry+https://github.com/rust-lang/crates.io-index
    │ ━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━ security vulnerability detected
    │
    ├ ID: RUSTSEC-2026-0104
    ├ Advisory: https://rustsec.org/advisories/RUSTSEC-2026-0104
    ├ A panic was reachable when parsing certificate revocation lists via [`BorrowedCertRevocationList::from_der`]
      or [`OwnedCertRevocationList::from_der`].  This was the result of mishandling a syntactically valid empty
      `BIT STRING` appearing in the `onlySomeReasons` element of a `IssuingDistributionPoint` CRL extension.
      
      This panic is reachable prior to a CRL's signature being verified.
      
      Applications that do not use CRLs are not affected.
      
      Thank you to @tynus3 for the report.
    ├ Solution: Upgrade to >=0.103.13, <0.104.0-alpha.1 OR >=0.104.0-alpha.7 (try `cargo update -p rustls-webpki`)
    ├ rustls-webpki v0.103.10
      └── rustls v0.23.37
          ├── hyper-rustls v0.27.7
          │   └── libdd-common v4.2.0
          │       └── libdd-sampling v2.1.0
          ├── libdd-common v4.2.0 (*)
          └── tokio-rustls v0.26.0
              ├── hyper-rustls v0.27.7 (*)
              └── libdd-common v4.2.0 (*)

advisories FAILED, bans ok, sources ok

📦 `libdd-trace-obfuscation` - 4 error(s)

Show output

error[unsound]: Rand is unsound with a custom logger using `rand::rng()`
    ┌─ /home/runner/work/libdatadog/libdatadog/Cargo.lock:182:1
    │
182 │ rand 0.8.5 registry+https://github.com/rust-lang/crates.io-index
    │ ━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━ unsound advisory detected
    │
    ├ ID: RUSTSEC-2026-0097
    ├ Advisory: https://rustsec.org/advisories/RUSTSEC-2026-0097
    ├ It has been reported (by @lopopolo) that the `rand` library is [unsound](https://rust-lang.github.io/unsafe-code-guidelines/glossary.html#soundness-of-code--of-a-library) (i.e. that safe code using the public API can cause Undefined Behaviour) when all the following conditions are met:
      
      - The `log` and `thread_rng` features are enabled
      - A [custom logger](https://docs.rs/log/latest/log/#implementing-a-logger) is defined
      - The custom logger accesses `rand::rng()` (previously `rand::thread_rng()`) and calls any `TryRng` (previously `RngCore`) methods on `ThreadRng`
      - The `ThreadRng` (attempts to) reseed while called from the custom logger (this happens every 64 kB of generated data)
      - Trace-level logging is enabled or warn-level logging is enabled and the random source (the `getrandom` crate) is unable to provide a new seed
      
      `TryRng` (previously `RngCore`) methods for `ThreadRng` use `unsafe` code to cast `*mut BlockRng<ReseedingCore>` to `&mut BlockRng<ReseedingCore>`. When all the above conditions are met this results in an aliased mutable reference, violating the Stacked Borrows rules. Miri is able to detect this violation in sample code. Since construction of [aliased mutable references is Undefined Behaviour](https://doc.rust-lang.org/stable/nomicon/references.html), the behaviour of optimized builds is hard to predict.
    ├ Announcement: https://github.com/rust-random/rand/pull/1763
    ├ Solution: Upgrade to >=0.10.1 OR <0.10.0, >=0.9.3 OR <0.9.0, >=0.8.6 (try `cargo update -p rand`)
    ├ rand v0.8.5
      ├── (dev) libdd-common v4.2.0
      │   ├── libdd-capabilities-impl v2.0.0
      │   │   └── libdd-trace-utils v6.0.1
      │   │       ├── libdd-trace-obfuscation v3.1.0
      │   │       └── (dev) libdd-trace-utils v6.0.1 (*)
      │   ├── libdd-trace-obfuscation v3.1.0 (*)
      │   └── libdd-trace-utils v6.0.1 (*)
      ├── (dev) libdd-trace-normalization v2.0.0
      │   └── libdd-trace-utils v6.0.1 (*)
      ├── libdd-trace-utils v6.0.1 (*)
      └── proptest v1.5.0
          └── (dev) libdd-tinybytes v1.1.1
              ├── (dev) libdd-tinybytes v1.1.1 (*)
              └── libdd-trace-utils v6.0.1 (*)

error[vulnerability]: Name constraints for URI names were incorrectly accepted
    ┌─ /home/runner/work/libdatadog/libdatadog/Cargo.lock:206:1
    │
206 │ rustls-webpki 0.103.10 registry+https://github.com/rust-lang/crates.io-index
    │ ━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━ security vulnerability detected
    │
    ├ ID: RUSTSEC-2026-0098
    ├ Advisory: https://rustsec.org/advisories/RUSTSEC-2026-0098
    ├ Name constraints for URI names were ignored and therefore accepted.
      
      Note this library does not provide an API for asserting URI names, and URI name constraints are otherwise not implemented.  URI name constraints are now rejected unconditionally.
      
      Since name constraints are restrictions on otherwise properly-issued certificates, this bug is reachable only after signature verification and requires misissuance to exploit.
      
      This vulnerability is identified as [GHSA-965h-392x-2mh5](https://github.com/rustls/webpki/security/advisories/GHSA-965h-392x-2mh5). Thank you to @1seal for the report.
    ├ Solution: Upgrade to >=0.103.12, <0.104.0-alpha.1 OR >=0.104.0-alpha.6 (try `cargo update -p rustls-webpki`)
    ├ rustls-webpki v0.103.10
      └── rustls v0.23.37
          ├── hyper-rustls v0.27.7
          │   └── libdd-common v4.2.0
          │       ├── libdd-capabilities-impl v2.0.0
          │       │   └── libdd-trace-utils v6.0.1
          │       │       ├── libdd-trace-obfuscation v3.1.0
          │       │       └── (dev) libdd-trace-utils v6.0.1 (*)
          │       ├── libdd-trace-obfuscation v3.1.0 (*)
          │       └── libdd-trace-utils v6.0.1 (*)
          ├── libdd-common v4.2.0 (*)
          └── tokio-rustls v0.26.0
              ├── hyper-rustls v0.27.7 (*)
              └── libdd-common v4.2.0 (*)

error[vulnerability]: Name constraints were accepted for certificates asserting a wildcard name
    ┌─ /home/runner/work/libdatadog/libdatadog/Cargo.lock:206:1
    │
206 │ rustls-webpki 0.103.10 registry+https://github.com/rust-lang/crates.io-index
    │ ━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━ security vulnerability detected
    │
    ├ ID: RUSTSEC-2026-0099
    ├ Advisory: https://rustsec.org/advisories/RUSTSEC-2026-0099
    ├ Permitted subtree name constraints for DNS names were accepted for certificates asserting a wildcard name.
      
      This was incorrect because, given a name constraint of `accept.example.com`, `*.example.com` could feasibly allow a name of `reject.example.com` which is outside the constraint.
      This is very similar to [CVE-2025-61727](https://go.dev/issue/76442).
      
      Since name constraints are restrictions on otherwise properly-issued certificates, this bug is reachable only after signature verification and requires misissuance to exploit.
      
      This vulnerability is identified as [GHSA-xgp8-3hg3-c2mh](https://github.com/rustls/webpki/security/advisories/GHSA-xgp8-3hg3-c2mh). Thank you to @1seal for the report.
    ├ Solution: Upgrade to >=0.103.12, <0.104.0-alpha.1 OR >=0.104.0-alpha.6 (try `cargo update -p rustls-webpki`)
    ├ rustls-webpki v0.103.10
      └── rustls v0.23.37
          ├── hyper-rustls v0.27.7
          │   └── libdd-common v4.2.0
          │       ├── libdd-capabilities-impl v2.0.0
          │       │   └── libdd-trace-utils v6.0.1
          │       │       ├── libdd-trace-obfuscation v3.1.0
          │       │       └── (dev) libdd-trace-utils v6.0.1 (*)
          │       ├── libdd-trace-obfuscation v3.1.0 (*)
          │       └── libdd-trace-utils v6.0.1 (*)
          ├── libdd-common v4.2.0 (*)
          └── tokio-rustls v0.26.0
              ├── hyper-rustls v0.27.7 (*)
              └── libdd-common v4.2.0 (*)

error[vulnerability]: Reachable panic in certificate revocation list parsing
    ┌─ /home/runner/work/libdatadog/libdatadog/Cargo.lock:206:1
    │
206 │ rustls-webpki 0.103.10 registry+https://github.com/rust-lang/crates.io-index
    │ ━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━ security vulnerability detected
    │
    ├ ID: RUSTSEC-2026-0104
    ├ Advisory: https://rustsec.org/advisories/RUSTSEC-2026-0104
    ├ A panic was reachable when parsing certificate revocation lists via [`BorrowedCertRevocationList::from_der`]
      or [`OwnedCertRevocationList::from_der`].  This was the result of mishandling a syntactically valid empty
      `BIT STRING` appearing in the `onlySomeReasons` element of a `IssuingDistributionPoint` CRL extension.
      
      This panic is reachable prior to a CRL's signature being verified.
      
      Applications that do not use CRLs are not affected.
      
      Thank you to @tynus3 for the report.
    ├ Solution: Upgrade to >=0.103.13, <0.104.0-alpha.1 OR >=0.104.0-alpha.7 (try `cargo update -p rustls-webpki`)
    ├ rustls-webpki v0.103.10
      └── rustls v0.23.37
          ├── hyper-rustls v0.27.7
          │   └── libdd-common v4.2.0
          │       ├── libdd-capabilities-impl v2.0.0
          │       │   └── libdd-trace-utils v6.0.1
          │       │       ├── libdd-trace-obfuscation v3.1.0
          │       │       └── (dev) libdd-trace-utils v6.0.1 (*)
          │       ├── libdd-trace-obfuscation v3.1.0 (*)
          │       └── libdd-trace-utils v6.0.1 (*)
          ├── libdd-common v4.2.0 (*)
          └── tokio-rustls v0.26.0
              ├── hyper-rustls v0.27.7 (*)
              └── libdd-common v4.2.0 (*)

advisories FAILED, bans ok, sources ok

📦 `libdd-trace-stats` - 4 error(s)

Show output

error[unsound]: Rand is unsound with a custom logger using `rand::rng()`
    ┌─ /home/runner/work/libdatadog/libdatadog/Cargo.lock:189:1
    │
189 │ rand 0.8.5 registry+https://github.com/rust-lang/crates.io-index
    │ ━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━ unsound advisory detected
    │
    ├ ID: RUSTSEC-2026-0097
    ├ Advisory: https://rustsec.org/advisories/RUSTSEC-2026-0097
    ├ It has been reported (by @lopopolo) that the `rand` library is [unsound](https://rust-lang.github.io/unsafe-code-guidelines/glossary.html#soundness-of-code--of-a-library) (i.e. that safe code using the public API can cause Undefined Behaviour) when all the following conditions are met:
      
      - The `log` and `thread_rng` features are enabled
      - A [custom logger](https://docs.rs/log/latest/log/#implementing-a-logger) is defined
      - The custom logger accesses `rand::rng()` (previously `rand::thread_rng()`) and calls any `TryRng` (previously `RngCore`) methods on `ThreadRng`
      - The `ThreadRng` (attempts to) reseed while called from the custom logger (this happens every 64 kB of generated data)
      - Trace-level logging is enabled or warn-level logging is enabled and the random source (the `getrandom` crate) is unable to provide a new seed
      
      `TryRng` (previously `RngCore`) methods for `ThreadRng` use `unsafe` code to cast `*mut BlockRng<ReseedingCore>` to `&mut BlockRng<ReseedingCore>`. When all the above conditions are met this results in an aliased mutable reference, violating the Stacked Borrows rules. Miri is able to detect this violation in sample code. Since construction of [aliased mutable references is Undefined Behaviour](https://doc.rust-lang.org/stable/nomicon/references.html), the behaviour of optimized builds is hard to predict.
    ├ Announcement: https://github.com/rust-random/rand/pull/1763
    ├ Solution: Upgrade to >=0.10.1 OR <0.10.0, >=0.9.3 OR <0.9.0, >=0.8.6 (try `cargo update -p rand`)
    ├ rand v0.8.5
      ├── (dev) libdd-common v4.2.0
      │   ├── libdd-capabilities-impl v2.0.0
      │   │   ├── libdd-shared-runtime v1.0.0
      │   │   │   └── libdd-trace-stats v4.0.0
      │   │   ├── libdd-trace-stats v4.0.0 (*)
      │   │   └── libdd-trace-utils v6.0.1
      │   │       ├── libdd-trace-obfuscation v3.1.0
      │   │       │   └── libdd-trace-stats v4.0.0 (*)
      │   │       ├── libdd-trace-stats v4.0.0 (*)
      │   │       └── (dev) libdd-trace-utils v6.0.1 (*)
      │   ├── libdd-shared-runtime v1.0.0 (*)
      │   ├── libdd-trace-obfuscation v3.1.0 (*)
      │   ├── libdd-trace-stats v4.0.0 (*)
      │   └── libdd-trace-utils v6.0.1 (*)
      ├── (dev) libdd-trace-normalization v2.0.0
      │   └── libdd-trace-utils v6.0.1 (*)
      ├── (dev) libdd-trace-stats v4.0.0 (*)
      ├── libdd-trace-utils v6.0.1 (*)
      └── proptest v1.5.0
          └── (dev) libdd-tinybytes v1.1.1
              ├── (dev) libdd-tinybytes v1.1.1 (*)
              └── libdd-trace-utils v6.0.1 (*)

error[vulnerability]: Name constraints for URI names were incorrectly accepted
    ┌─ /home/runner/work/libdatadog/libdatadog/Cargo.lock:213:1
    │
213 │ rustls-webpki 0.103.10 registry+https://github.com/rust-lang/crates.io-index
    │ ━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━ security vulnerability detected
    │
    ├ ID: RUSTSEC-2026-0098
    ├ Advisory: https://rustsec.org/advisories/RUSTSEC-2026-0098
    ├ Name constraints for URI names were ignored and therefore accepted.
      
      Note this library does not provide an API for asserting URI names, and URI name constraints are otherwise not implemented.  URI name constraints are now rejected unconditionally.
      
      Since name constraints are restrictions on otherwise properly-issued certificates, this bug is reachable only after signature verification and requires misissuance to exploit.
      
      This vulnerability is identified as [GHSA-965h-392x-2mh5](https://github.com/rustls/webpki/security/advisories/GHSA-965h-392x-2mh5). Thank you to @1seal for the report.
    ├ Solution: Upgrade to >=0.103.12, <0.104.0-alpha.1 OR >=0.104.0-alpha.6 (try `cargo update -p rustls-webpki`)
    ├ rustls-webpki v0.103.10
      └── rustls v0.23.37
          ├── hyper-rustls v0.27.7
          │   └── libdd-common v4.2.0
          │       ├── libdd-capabilities-impl v2.0.0
          │       │   ├── libdd-shared-runtime v1.0.0
          │       │   │   └── libdd-trace-stats v4.0.0
          │       │   ├── libdd-trace-stats v4.0.0 (*)
          │       │   └── libdd-trace-utils v6.0.1
          │       │       ├── libdd-trace-obfuscation v3.1.0
          │       │       │   └── libdd-trace-stats v4.0.0 (*)
          │       │       ├── libdd-trace-stats v4.0.0 (*)
          │       │       └── (dev) libdd-trace-utils v6.0.1 (*)
          │       ├── libdd-shared-runtime v1.0.0 (*)
          │       ├── libdd-trace-obfuscation v3.1.0 (*)
          │       ├── libdd-trace-stats v4.0.0 (*)
          │       └── libdd-trace-utils v6.0.1 (*)
          ├── libdd-common v4.2.0 (*)
          └── tokio-rustls v0.26.0
              ├── hyper-rustls v0.27.7 (*)
              └── libdd-common v4.2.0 (*)

error[vulnerability]: Name constraints were accepted for certificates asserting a wildcard name
    ┌─ /home/runner/work/libdatadog/libdatadog/Cargo.lock:213:1
    │
213 │ rustls-webpki 0.103.10 registry+https://github.com/rust-lang/crates.io-index
    │ ━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━ security vulnerability detected
    │
    ├ ID: RUSTSEC-2026-0099
    ├ Advisory: https://rustsec.org/advisories/RUSTSEC-2026-0099
    ├ Permitted subtree name constraints for DNS names were accepted for certificates asserting a wildcard name.
      
      This was incorrect because, given a name constraint of `accept.example.com`, `*.example.com` could feasibly allow a name of `reject.example.com` which is outside the constraint.
      This is very similar to [CVE-2025-61727](https://go.dev/issue/76442).
      
      Since name constraints are restrictions on otherwise properly-issued certificates, this bug is reachable only after signature verification and requires misissuance to exploit.
      
      This vulnerability is identified as [GHSA-xgp8-3hg3-c2mh](https://github.com/rustls/webpki/security/advisories/GHSA-xgp8-3hg3-c2mh). Thank you to @1seal for the report.
    ├ Solution: Upgrade to >=0.103.12, <0.104.0-alpha.1 OR >=0.104.0-alpha.6 (try `cargo update -p rustls-webpki`)
    ├ rustls-webpki v0.103.10
      └── rustls v0.23.37
          ├── hyper-rustls v0.27.7
          │   └── libdd-common v4.2.0
          │       ├── libdd-capabilities-impl v2.0.0
          │       │   ├── libdd-shared-runtime v1.0.0
          │       │   │   └── libdd-trace-stats v4.0.0
          │       │   ├── libdd-trace-stats v4.0.0 (*)
          │       │   └── libdd-trace-utils v6.0.1
          │       │       ├── libdd-trace-obfuscation v3.1.0
          │       │       │   └── libdd-trace-stats v4.0.0 (*)
          │       │       ├── libdd-trace-stats v4.0.0 (*)
          │       │       └── (dev) libdd-trace-utils v6.0.1 (*)
          │       ├── libdd-shared-runtime v1.0.0 (*)
          │       ├── libdd-trace-obfuscation v3.1.0 (*)
          │       ├── libdd-trace-stats v4.0.0 (*)
          │       └── libdd-trace-utils v6.0.1 (*)
          ├── libdd-common v4.2.0 (*)
          └── tokio-rustls v0.26.0
              ├── hyper-rustls v0.27.7 (*)
              └── libdd-common v4.2.0 (*)

error[vulnerability]: Reachable panic in certificate revocation list parsing
    ┌─ /home/runner/work/libdatadog/libdatadog/Cargo.lock:213:1
    │
213 │ rustls-webpki 0.103.10 registry+https://github.com/rust-lang/crates.io-index
    │ ━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━ security vulnerability detected
    │
    ├ ID: RUSTSEC-2026-0104
    ├ Advisory: https://rustsec.org/advisories/RUSTSEC-2026-0104
    ├ A panic was reachable when parsing certificate revocation lists via [`BorrowedCertRevocationList::from_der`]
      or [`OwnedCertRevocationList::from_der`].  This was the result of mishandling a syntactically valid empty
      `BIT STRING` appearing in the `onlySomeReasons` element of a `IssuingDistributionPoint` CRL extension.
      
      This panic is reachable prior to a CRL's signature being verified.
      
      Applications that do not use CRLs are not affected.
      
      Thank you to @tynus3 for the report.
    ├ Solution: Upgrade to >=0.103.13, <0.104.0-alpha.1 OR >=0.104.0-alpha.7 (try `cargo update -p rustls-webpki`)
    ├ rustls-webpki v0.103.10
      └── rustls v0.23.37
          ├── hyper-rustls v0.27.7
          │   └── libdd-common v4.2.0
          │       ├── libdd-capabilities-impl v2.0.0
          │       │   ├── libdd-shared-runtime v1.0.0
          │       │   │   └── libdd-trace-stats v4.0.0
          │       │   ├── libdd-trace-stats v4.0.0 (*)
          │       │   └── libdd-trace-utils v6.0.1
          │       │       ├── libdd-trace-obfuscation v3.1.0
          │       │       │   └── libdd-trace-stats v4.0.0 (*)
          │       │       ├── libdd-trace-stats v4.0.0 (*)
          │       │       └── (dev) libdd-trace-utils v6.0.1 (*)
          │       ├── libdd-shared-runtime v1.0.0 (*)
          │       ├── libdd-trace-obfuscation v3.1.0 (*)
          │       ├── libdd-trace-stats v4.0.0 (*)
          │       └── libdd-trace-utils v6.0.1 (*)
          ├── libdd-common v4.2.0 (*)
          └── tokio-rustls v0.26.0
              ├── hyper-rustls v0.27.7 (*)
              └── libdd-common v4.2.0 (*)

advisories FAILED, bans ok, sources ok

📦 `libdd-trace-utils` - 4 error(s)

Show output

error[unsound]: Rand is unsound with a custom logger using `rand::rng()`
    ┌─ /home/runner/work/libdatadog/libdatadog/Cargo.lock:177:1
    │
177 │ rand 0.8.5 registry+https://github.com/rust-lang/crates.io-index
    │ ━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━ unsound advisory detected
    │
    ├ ID: RUSTSEC-2026-0097
    ├ Advisory: https://rustsec.org/advisories/RUSTSEC-2026-0097
    ├ It has been reported (by @lopopolo) that the `rand` library is [unsound](https://rust-lang.github.io/unsafe-code-guidelines/glossary.html#soundness-of-code--of-a-library) (i.e. that safe code using the public API can cause Undefined Behaviour) when all the following conditions are met:
      
      - The `log` and `thread_rng` features are enabled
      - A [custom logger](https://docs.rs/log/latest/log/#implementing-a-logger) is defined
      - The custom logger accesses `rand::rng()` (previously `rand::thread_rng()`) and calls any `TryRng` (previously `RngCore`) methods on `ThreadRng`
      - The `ThreadRng` (attempts to) reseed while called from the custom logger (this happens every 64 kB of generated data)
      - Trace-level logging is enabled or warn-level logging is enabled and the random source (the `getrandom` crate) is unable to provide a new seed
      
      `TryRng` (previously `RngCore`) methods for `ThreadRng` use `unsafe` code to cast `*mut BlockRng<ReseedingCore>` to `&mut BlockRng<ReseedingCore>`. When all the above conditions are met this results in an aliased mutable reference, violating the Stacked Borrows rules. Miri is able to detect this violation in sample code. Since construction of [aliased mutable references is Undefined Behaviour](https://doc.rust-lang.org/stable/nomicon/references.html), the behaviour of optimized builds is hard to predict.
    ├ Announcement: https://github.com/rust-random/rand/pull/1763
    ├ Solution: Upgrade to >=0.10.1 OR <0.10.0, >=0.9.3 OR <0.9.0, >=0.8.6 (try `cargo update -p rand`)
    ├ rand v0.8.5
      ├── (dev) libdd-common v4.2.0
      │   ├── libdd-capabilities-impl v2.0.0
      │   │   └── libdd-trace-utils v6.0.1
      │   │       └── (dev) libdd-trace-utils v6.0.1 (*)
      │   └── libdd-trace-utils v6.0.1 (*)
      ├── (dev) libdd-trace-normalization v2.0.0
      │   └── libdd-trace-utils v6.0.1 (*)
      ├── libdd-trace-utils v6.0.1 (*)
      └── proptest v1.5.0
          └── (dev) libdd-tinybytes v1.1.1
              ├── (dev) libdd-tinybytes v1.1.1 (*)
              └── libdd-trace-utils v6.0.1 (*)

error[vulnerability]: Name constraints for URI names were incorrectly accepted
    ┌─ /home/runner/work/libdatadog/libdatadog/Cargo.lock:199:1
    │
199 │ rustls-webpki 0.103.10 registry+https://github.com/rust-lang/crates.io-index
    │ ━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━ security vulnerability detected
    │
    ├ ID: RUSTSEC-2026-0098
    ├ Advisory: https://rustsec.org/advisories/RUSTSEC-2026-0098
    ├ Name constraints for URI names were ignored and therefore accepted.
      
      Note this library does not provide an API for asserting URI names, and URI name constraints are otherwise not implemented.  URI name constraints are now rejected unconditionally.
      
      Since name constraints are restrictions on otherwise properly-issued certificates, this bug is reachable only after signature verification and requires misissuance to exploit.
      
      This vulnerability is identified as [GHSA-965h-392x-2mh5](https://github.com/rustls/webpki/security/advisories/GHSA-965h-392x-2mh5). Thank you to @1seal for the report.
    ├ Solution: Upgrade to >=0.103.12, <0.104.0-alpha.1 OR >=0.104.0-alpha.6 (try `cargo update -p rustls-webpki`)
    ├ rustls-webpki v0.103.10
      └── rustls v0.23.37
          ├── hyper-rustls v0.27.7
          │   └── libdd-common v4.2.0
          │       ├── libdd-capabilities-impl v2.0.0
          │       │   └── libdd-trace-utils v6.0.1
          │       │       └── (dev) libdd-trace-utils v6.0.1 (*)
          │       └── libdd-trace-utils v6.0.1 (*)
          ├── libdd-common v4.2.0 (*)
          └── tokio-rustls v0.26.0
              ├── hyper-rustls v0.27.7 (*)
              └── libdd-common v4.2.0 (*)

error[vulnerability]: Name constraints were accepted for certificates asserting a wildcard name
    ┌─ /home/runner/work/libdatadog/libdatadog/Cargo.lock:199:1
    │
199 │ rustls-webpki 0.103.10 registry+https://github.com/rust-lang/crates.io-index
    │ ━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━ security vulnerability detected
    │
    ├ ID: RUSTSEC-2026-0099
    ├ Advisory: https://rustsec.org/advisories/RUSTSEC-2026-0099
    ├ Permitted subtree name constraints for DNS names were accepted for certificates asserting a wildcard name.
      
      This was incorrect because, given a name constraint of `accept.example.com`, `*.example.com` could feasibly allow a name of `reject.example.com` which is outside the constraint.
      This is very similar to [CVE-2025-61727](https://go.dev/issue/76442).
      
      Since name constraints are restrictions on otherwise properly-issued certificates, this bug is reachable only after signature verification and requires misissuance to exploit.
      
      This vulnerability is identified as [GHSA-xgp8-3hg3-c2mh](https://github.com/rustls/webpki/security/advisories/GHSA-xgp8-3hg3-c2mh). Thank you to @1seal for the report.
    ├ Solution: Upgrade to >=0.103.12, <0.104.0-alpha.1 OR >=0.104.0-alpha.6 (try `cargo update -p rustls-webpki`)
    ├ rustls-webpki v0.103.10
      └── rustls v0.23.37
          ├── hyper-rustls v0.27.7
          │   └── libdd-common v4.2.0
          │       ├── libdd-capabilities-impl v2.0.0
          │       │   └── libdd-trace-utils v6.0.1
          │       │       └── (dev) libdd-trace-utils v6.0.1 (*)
          │       └── libdd-trace-utils v6.0.1 (*)
          ├── libdd-common v4.2.0 (*)
          └── tokio-rustls v0.26.0
              ├── hyper-rustls v0.27.7 (*)
              └── libdd-common v4.2.0 (*)

error[vulnerability]: Reachable panic in certificate revocation list parsing
    ┌─ /home/runner/work/libdatadog/libdatadog/Cargo.lock:199:1
    │
199 │ rustls-webpki 0.103.10 registry+https://github.com/rust-lang/crates.io-index
    │ ━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━ security vulnerability detected
    │
    ├ ID: RUSTSEC-2026-0104
    ├ Advisory: https://rustsec.org/advisories/RUSTSEC-2026-0104
    ├ A panic was reachable when parsing certificate revocation lists via [`BorrowedCertRevocationList::from_der`]
      or [`OwnedCertRevocationList::from_der`].  This was the result of mishandling a syntactically valid empty
      `BIT STRING` appearing in the `onlySomeReasons` element of a `IssuingDistributionPoint` CRL extension.
      
      This panic is reachable prior to a CRL's signature being verified.
      
      Applications that do not use CRLs are not affected.
      
      Thank you to @tynus3 for the report.
    ├ Solution: Upgrade to >=0.103.13, <0.104.0-alpha.1 OR >=0.104.0-alpha.7 (try `cargo update -p rustls-webpki`)
    ├ rustls-webpki v0.103.10
      └── rustls v0.23.37
          ├── hyper-rustls v0.27.7
          │   └── libdd-common v4.2.0
          │       ├── libdd-capabilities-impl v2.0.0
          │       │   └── libdd-trace-utils v6.0.1
          │       │       └── (dev) libdd-trace-utils v6.0.1 (*)
          │       └── libdd-trace-utils v6.0.1 (*)
          ├── libdd-common v4.2.0 (*)
          └── tokio-rustls v0.26.0
              ├── hyper-rustls v0.27.7 (*)
              └── libdd-common v4.2.0 (*)

advisories FAILED, bans ok, sources ok

📦 `libdd-tracer-flare` - 5 error(s)

Show output

error[unsound]: Rand is unsound with a custom logger using `rand::rng()`
    ┌─ /home/runner/work/libdatadog/libdatadog/Cargo.lock:194:1
    │
194 │ rand 0.8.5 registry+https://github.com/rust-lang/crates.io-index
    │ ━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━ unsound advisory detected
    │
    ├ ID: RUSTSEC-2026-0097
    ├ Advisory: https://rustsec.org/advisories/RUSTSEC-2026-0097
    ├ It has been reported (by @lopopolo) that the `rand` library is [unsound](https://rust-lang.github.io/unsafe-code-guidelines/glossary.html#soundness-of-code--of-a-library) (i.e. that safe code using the public API can cause Undefined Behaviour) when all the following conditions are met:
      
      - The `log` and `thread_rng` features are enabled
      - A [custom logger](https://docs.rs/log/latest/log/#implementing-a-logger) is defined
      - The custom logger accesses `rand::rng()` (previously `rand::thread_rng()`) and calls any `TryRng` (previously `RngCore`) methods on `ThreadRng`
      - The `ThreadRng` (attempts to) reseed while called from the custom logger (this happens every 64 kB of generated data)
      - Trace-level logging is enabled or warn-level logging is enabled and the random source (the `getrandom` crate) is unable to provide a new seed
      
      `TryRng` (previously `RngCore`) methods for `ThreadRng` use `unsafe` code to cast `*mut BlockRng<ReseedingCore>` to `&mut BlockRng<ReseedingCore>`. When all the above conditions are met this results in an aliased mutable reference, violating the Stacked Borrows rules. Miri is able to detect this violation in sample code. Since construction of [aliased mutable references is Undefined Behaviour](https://doc.rust-lang.org/stable/nomicon/references.html), the behaviour of optimized builds is hard to predict.
    ├ Announcement: https://github.com/rust-random/rand/pull/1763
    ├ Solution: Upgrade to >=0.10.1 OR <0.10.0, >=0.9.3 OR <0.9.0, >=0.8.6 (try `cargo update -p rand`)
    ├ rand v0.8.5
      ├── (dev) libdd-common v4.2.0
      │   ├── datadog-remote-config v0.0.1
      │   │   ├── (dev) datadog-remote-config v0.0.1 (*)
      │   │   └── libdd-tracer-flare v0.1.0
      │   ├── libdd-capabilities-impl v2.0.0
      │   │   └── libdd-trace-utils v6.0.1
      │   │       ├── (dev) libdd-trace-utils v6.0.1 (*)
      │   │       └── (dev) libdd-tracer-flare v0.1.0 (*)
      │   ├── libdd-trace-utils v6.0.1 (*)
      │   └── libdd-tracer-flare v0.1.0 (*)
      ├── (dev) libdd-trace-normalization v2.0.0
      │   └── libdd-trace-utils v6.0.1 (*)
      ├── libdd-trace-utils v6.0.1 (*)
      └── proptest v1.5.0
          └── (dev) libdd-tinybytes v1.1.1
              ├── (dev) libdd-tinybytes v1.1.1 (*)
              └── libdd-trace-utils v6.0.1 (*)

error[vulnerability]: Name constraints for URI names were incorrectly accepted
    ┌─ /home/runner/work/libdatadog/libdatadog/Cargo.lock:216:1
    │
216 │ rustls-webpki 0.103.10 registry+https://github.com/rust-lang/crates.io-index
    │ ━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━ security vulnerability detected
    │
    ├ ID: RUSTSEC-2026-0098
    ├ Advisory: https://rustsec.org/advisories/RUSTSEC-2026-0098
    ├ Name constraints for URI names were ignored and therefore accepted.
      
      Note this library does not provide an API for asserting URI names, and URI name constraints are otherwise not implemented.  URI name constraints are now rejected unconditionally.
      
      Since name constraints are restrictions on otherwise properly-issued certificates, this bug is reachable only after signature verification and requires misissuance to exploit.
      
      This vulnerability is identified as [GHSA-965h-392x-2mh5](https://github.com/rustls/webpki/security/advisories/GHSA-965h-392x-2mh5). Thank you to @1seal for the report.
    ├ Solution: Upgrade to >=0.103.12, <0.104.0-alpha.1 OR >=0.104.0-alpha.6 (try `cargo update -p rustls-webpki`)
    ├ rustls-webpki v0.103.10
      └── rustls v0.23.37
          ├── hyper-rustls v0.27.7
          │   └── libdd-common v4.2.0
          │       ├── datadog-remote-config v0.0.1
          │       │   ├── (dev) datadog-remote-config v0.0.1 (*)
          │       │   └── libdd-tracer-flare v0.1.0
          │       ├── libdd-capabilities-impl v2.0.0
          │       │   └── libdd-trace-utils v6.0.1
          │       │       ├── (dev) libdd-trace-utils v6.0.1 (*)
          │       │       └── (dev) libdd-tracer-flare v0.1.0 (*)
          │       ├── libdd-trace-utils v6.0.1 (*)
          │       └── libdd-tracer-flare v0.1.0 (*)
          ├── libdd-common v4.2.0 (*)
          └── tokio-rustls v0.26.0
              ├── hyper-rustls v0.27.7 (*)
              └── libdd-common v4.2.0 (*)

error[vulnerability]: Name constraints were accepted for certificates asserting a wildcard name
    ┌─ /home/runner/work/libdatadog/libdatadog/Cargo.lock:216:1
    │
216 │ rustls-webpki 0.103.10 registry+https://github.com/rust-lang/crates.io-index
    │ ━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━ security vulnerability detected
    │
    ├ ID: RUSTSEC-2026-0099
    ├ Advisory: https://rustsec.org/advisories/RUSTSEC-2026-0099
    ├ Permitted subtree name constraints for DNS names were accepted for certificates asserting a wildcard name.
      
      This was incorrect because, given a name constraint of `accept.example.com`, `*.example.com` could feasibly allow a name of `reject.example.com` which is outside the constraint.
      This is very similar to [CVE-2025-61727](https://go.dev/issue/76442).
      
      Since name constraints are restrictions on otherwise properly-issued certificates, this bug is reachable only after signature verification and requires misissuance to exploit.
      
      This vulnerability is identified as [GHSA-xgp8-3hg3-c2mh](https://github.com/rustls/webpki/security/advisories/GHSA-xgp8-3hg3-c2mh). Thank you to @1seal for the report.
    ├ Solution: Upgrade to >=0.103.12, <0.104.0-alpha.1 OR >=0.104.0-alpha.6 (try `cargo update -p rustls-webpki`)
    ├ rustls-webpki v0.103.10
      └── rustls v0.23.37
          ├── hyper-rustls v0.27.7
          │   └── libdd-common v4.2.0
          │       ├── datadog-remote-config v0.0.1
          │       │   ├── (dev) datadog-remote-config v0.0.1 (*)
          │       │   └── libdd-tracer-flare v0.1.0
          │       ├── libdd-capabilities-impl v2.0.0
          │       │   └── libdd-trace-utils v6.0.1
          │       │       ├── (dev) libdd-trace-utils v6.0.1 (*)
          │       │       └── (dev) libdd-tracer-flare v0.1.0 (*)
          │       ├── libdd-trace-utils v6.0.1 (*)
          │       └── libdd-tracer-flare v0.1.0 (*)
          ├── libdd-common v4.2.0 (*)
          └── tokio-rustls v0.26.0
              ├── hyper-rustls v0.27.7 (*)
              └── libdd-common v4.2.0 (*)

error[vulnerability]: Reachable panic in certificate revocation list parsing
    ┌─ /home/runner/work/libdatadog/libdatadog/Cargo.lock:216:1
    │
216 │ rustls-webpki 0.103.10 registry+https://github.com/rust-lang/crates.io-index
    │ ━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━ security vulnerability detected
    │
    ├ ID: RUSTSEC-2026-0104
    ├ Advisory: https://rustsec.org/advisories/RUSTSEC-2026-0104
    ├ A panic was reachable when parsing certificate revocation lists via [`BorrowedCertRevocationList::from_der`]
      or [`OwnedCertRevocationList::from_der`].  This was the result of mishandling a syntactically valid empty
      `BIT STRING` appearing in the `onlySomeReasons` element of a `IssuingDistributionPoint` CRL extension.
      
      This panic is reachable prior to a CRL's signature being verified.
      
      Applications that do not use CRLs are not affected.
      
      Thank you to @tynus3 for the report.
    ├ Solution: Upgrade to >=0.103.13, <0.104.0-alpha.1 OR >=0.104.0-alpha.7 (try `cargo update -p rustls-webpki`)
    ├ rustls-webpki v0.103.10
      └── rustls v0.23.37
          ├── hyper-rustls v0.27.7
          │   └── libdd-common v4.2.0
          │       ├── datadog-remote-config v0.0.1
          │       │   ├── (dev) datadog-remote-config v0.0.1 (*)
          │       │   └── libdd-tracer-flare v0.1.0
          │       ├── libdd-capabilities-impl v2.0.0
          │       │   └── libdd-trace-utils v6.0.1
          │       │       ├── (dev) libdd-trace-utils v6.0.1 (*)
          │       │       └── (dev) libdd-tracer-flare v0.1.0 (*)
          │       ├── libdd-trace-utils v6.0.1 (*)
          │       └── libdd-tracer-flare v0.1.0 (*)
          ├── libdd-common v4.2.0 (*)
          └── tokio-rustls v0.26.0
              ├── hyper-rustls v0.27.7 (*)
              └── libdd-common v4.2.0 (*)

error[vulnerability]: Denial of Service via Stack Exhaustion
    ┌─ /home/runner/work/libdatadog/libdatadog/Cargo.lock:256:1
    │
256 │ time 0.3.41 registry+https://github.com/rust-lang/crates.io-index
    │ ━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━ security vulnerability detected
    │
    ├ ID: RUSTSEC-2026-0009
    ├ Advisory: https://rustsec.org/advisories/RUSTSEC-2026-0009
    ├ ## Impact
      
      When user-provided input is provided to any type that parses with the RFC 2822 format, a denial of
      service attack via stack exhaustion is possible. The attack relies on formally deprecated and
      rarely-used features that are part of the RFC 2822 format used in a malicious manner. Ordinary,
      non-malicious input will never encounter this scenario.
      
      ## Patches
      
      A limit to the depth of recursion was added in v0.3.47. From this version, an error will be returned
      rather than exhausting the stack.
      
      ## Workarounds
      
      Limiting the length of user input is the simplest way to avoid stack exhaustion, as the amount of
      the stack consumed would be at most a factor of the length of the input.
    ├ Announcement: https://github.com/time-rs/time/blob/main/CHANGELOG.md#0347-2026-02-05
    ├ Solution: Upgrade to >=0.3.47 (try `cargo update -p time`)
    ├ time v0.3.41
      └── datadog-remote-config v0.0.1
          ├── (dev) datadog-remote-config v0.0.1 (*)
          └── libdd-tracer-flare v0.1.0

advisories FAILED, bans ok, sources ok

Updated: 2026-06-01 09:40:25 UTC | Commit: 3bc808b | dependency-check job results

codecov-commenter · 2026-06-01T09:56:14Z

Codecov Report

✅ All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests.
✅ Project coverage is 72.98%. Comparing base (8e221b6) to head (0834002).
⚠️ Report is 1 commits behind head on release/libdd-sampling/20260601-092429.

Additional details and impacted files

@@                            Coverage Diff                             @@
##           release/libdd-sampling/20260601-092429    #2065      +/-   ##
==========================================================================
+ Coverage                                   72.93%   72.98%   +0.05%     
==========================================================================
  Files                                         460      460              
  Lines                                       76711    76711              
==========================================================================
+ Hits                                        55948    55988      +40     
+ Misses                                      20763    20723      -40

Components	Coverage Δ
libdd-crashtracker	`65.49% <ø> (-0.02%)`	⬇️
libdd-crashtracker-ffi	`37.92% <ø> (ø)`
libdd-alloc	`98.77% <ø> (ø)`
libdd-data-pipeline	`85.87% <ø> (+0.72%)`	⬆️
libdd-data-pipeline-ffi	`77.19% <ø> (+3.29%)`	⬆️
libdd-common	`79.89% <ø> (ø)`
libdd-common-ffi	`74.41% <ø> (ø)`
libdd-telemetry	`73.37% <ø> (ø)`
libdd-telemetry-ffi	`31.36% <ø> (ø)`
libdd-dogstatsd-client	`82.64% <ø> (ø)`
datadog-ipc	`76.22% <ø> (+1.46%)`	⬆️
libdd-profiling	`81.68% <ø> (-0.02%)`	⬇️
libdd-profiling-ffi	`64.79% <ø> (ø)`
libdd-sampling	`97.41% <ø> (ø)`
datadog-sidecar	`28.50% <ø> (-0.45%)`	⬇️
datdog-sidecar-ffi	`6.78% <ø> (-2.22%)`	⬇️
spawn-worker	`48.86% <ø> (ø)`
libdd-tinybytes	`93.80% <ø> (ø)`
libdd-trace-normalization	`81.71% <ø> (ø)`
libdd-trace-obfuscation	`87.30% <ø> (ø)`
libdd-trace-protobuf	`68.25% <ø> (ø)`
libdd-trace-utils	`89.18% <ø> (ø)`
libdd-tracer-flare	`86.88% <ø> (ø)`
libdd-log	`74.83% <ø> (ø)`

🚀 New features to boost your workflow:

❄️ Test Analytics: Detect flaky tests, report on failures, and find test suite problems.
📦 JS Bundle Analysis: Save yourself from yourself by tracking and limiting bundle sizes in JS merges.

…ling (#2065)) (#2066) This PR merges the release branch to main Co-authored-by: igor.unanua <igor.unanua@datadoghq.com>

github-actions Bot and others added 4 commits June 1, 2026 09:28

chore: Release

1cf331e

Co-authored-by: iunanua <18325288+iunanua@users.noreply.github.com>

chore: Release

ba928c5

Co-authored-by: iunanua <18325288+iunanua@users.noreply.github.com>

chore(release): update CHANGELOG.md for libdd-trace-utils

230f859

Co-authored-by: iunanua <18325288+iunanua@users.noreply.github.com>

chore(release): update CHANGELOG.md for libdd-sampling

6cac100

Co-authored-by: iunanua <18325288+iunanua@users.noreply.github.com>

dd-octo-sts Bot added skip-changelog-check skip-metadata-check release-proposal This is a release proposal PR skip-pr-title-semver-check labels Jun 1, 2026

github-actions Bot added mini-agent data-pipeline sampling labels Jun 1, 2026

This comment has been minimized.

Sign in to view

libdd-sampling minor bump

0834002

iunanua marked this pull request as ready for review June 1, 2026 09:41

iunanua requested review from a team as code owners June 1, 2026 09:41

iunanua merged commit ccfac43 into release/libdd-sampling/20260601-092429 Jun 1, 2026
69 of 72 checks passed

iunanua deleted the release-proposal/libdd-sampling/20260601-092429 branch June 1, 2026 09:44

Provide feedback

Saved searches

Use saved searches to filter your results more quickly

chore(release): proposal for libdd-sampling#2065

chore(release): proposal for libdd-sampling#2065
iunanua merged 5 commits into
release/libdd-sampling/20260601-092429from
release-proposal/libdd-sampling/20260601-092429

dd-octo-sts Bot commented Jun 1, 2026 •

edited by iunanua

Loading

Uh oh!

This comment has been minimized.

github-actions Bot commented Jun 1, 2026 •

edited

Loading

Uh oh!

github-actions Bot commented Jun 1, 2026 •

edited

Loading

Uh oh!

Uh oh!

codecov-commenter commented Jun 1, 2026

Uh oh!

Reviewers

Assignees

Labels

Projects

Milestone

Development

Uh oh!

2 participants

Conversation

dd-octo-sts Bot commented Jun 1, 2026 • edited by iunanua Loading Uh oh! There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.

Uh oh!

Release proposal for libdd-sampling and its dependencies

libdd-trace-utils

Commits

libdd-sampling (bumped manually as #2033 is a minor)

Commits

Uh oh!

This comment has been minimized.

github-actions Bot commented Jun 1, 2026 • edited Loading Uh oh! There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.

Uh oh!

📚 Documentation Check Results

📦 libdd-data-pipeline - 1058 warning(s)

📦 libdd-sampling - 178 warning(s)

📦 libdd-trace-obfuscation - 680 warning(s)

📦 libdd-trace-stats - 719 warning(s)

📦 libdd-trace-utils - 593 warning(s)

📦 libdd-tracer-flare - 846 warning(s)

Uh oh!

github-actions Bot commented Jun 1, 2026 • edited Loading Uh oh! There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.

Uh oh!

🔒 Cargo Deny Results

📦 libdd-data-pipeline - 5 error(s)

📦 libdd-sampling - 4 error(s)

📦 libdd-trace-obfuscation - 4 error(s)

📦 libdd-trace-stats - 4 error(s)

📦 libdd-trace-utils - 4 error(s)

📦 libdd-tracer-flare - 5 error(s)

Uh oh!

Uh oh!

codecov-commenter commented Jun 1, 2026

Codecov Report

Uh oh!

Reviewers

Assignees

Labels

Projects

Milestone

Development

Uh oh!

2 participants

dd-octo-sts Bot commented Jun 1, 2026 •

edited by iunanua

Loading

github-actions Bot commented Jun 1, 2026 •

edited

Loading

📦 `libdd-data-pipeline` - 1058 warning(s)

📦 `libdd-sampling` - 178 warning(s)

📦 `libdd-trace-obfuscation` - 680 warning(s)

📦 `libdd-trace-stats` - 719 warning(s)

📦 `libdd-trace-utils` - 593 warning(s)

📦 `libdd-tracer-flare` - 846 warning(s)

github-actions Bot commented Jun 1, 2026 •

edited

Loading

📦 `libdd-data-pipeline` - 5 error(s)

📦 `libdd-sampling` - 4 error(s)

📦 `libdd-trace-obfuscation` - 4 error(s)

📦 `libdd-trace-stats` - 4 error(s)

📦 `libdd-trace-utils` - 4 error(s)

📦 `libdd-tracer-flare` - 5 error(s)