Skip to content

Conversation

@dzmitry-lahoda
Copy link
Contributor

@dzmitry-lahoda dzmitry-lahoda commented Aug 7, 2023

So here is one step closer attempt in script to get XCVM demo transfer.
Script now forms correct program, transfers funds into it, so yet failing on IBC decoding.
Fixing in next PR.

some chores:

  • added command to kill all devnet fast
  • added some debug improvements
  • improved naming for some code in xcvm
  • rerun schema generator
  • simpler XCVM programs in JSON (hex salt/tag in all places)

Required for merge:

  • pr-workflow-check / draft-release-check is ✅ success
  • Other rules GitHub shows you, or can be read in configuration

Makes review faster:

  • PR title is my best effort to provide summary of changes and has clear text to be part of release notes
  • I marked PR by misc label if it should not be in release notes
  • Linked Zenhub/Github/Slack/etc reference if one exists
  • I was clear on what type of deployment required to release my changes (node, runtime, contract, indexer, on chain operation, frontend, infrastructure) if any in PR title or description
  • Added reviewer into Reviewers
  • I tagged(@) or used other form of notification of one person who I think can handle best review of this PR
  • I have proved that PR has no general regressions of relevant features and processes required to release into production
  • Any dependency updates made, was done according guides from relevant dependency
  • Clicking all checkboxes
  • Adding detailed description of changes when it feels appropriate (for example when PR is big)

@github-actions
Copy link

github-actions bot commented Aug 7, 2023

Pull reviewers stats

Stats of the last 30 days for composable:

User Total reviews Time to review Total comments
dzmitry-lahoda 20 12h 34m 20
RustNinja 19 1h 50m 2
blasrodri 16 2h 33m 13
mina86 8 12h 56m 64
kkast 8 11h 17m 4
vmarkushin 1 1h 6m 0
josietyleung 1 1d 20h 28m 3
JafarAz 1 9h 25m 0

@github-actions
Copy link

github-actions bot commented Aug 7, 2023

# run Composable node
nix run "github:ComposableFi/composable/refs/pull/4028/merge" --allow-import-from-derivation --extra-experimental-features "flakes nix-command" --no-sandbox --accept-flake-config --option sandbox relaxed
# run local Picasso DevNet (for CosmWasm development)
nix run "github:ComposableFi/composable/refs/pull/4028/merge#devnet-picasso" --allow-import-from-derivation --extra-experimental-features "flakes nix-command" --no-sandbox --accept-flake-config --option sandbox relaxed 
# CosmWasm on Substrate CLI tool
nix run "github:ComposableFi/composable/refs/pull/4028/merge#ccw" --allow-import-from-derivation --extra-experimental-features "flakes nix-command" --no-sandbox --accept-flake-config --option sandbox relaxed 
# run cross chain devnet with Dotsama and Cosmos nodes 
nix run "github:ComposableFi/composable/refs/pull/4028/merge#devnet-xc-fresh" --allow-import-from-derivation --extra-experimental-features "flakes nix-command" --no-sandbox --accept-flake-config --option sandbox relaxed 
# or same with docker
nix build "github:ComposableFi/composable/refs/pull/4028/merge#devnet-xc-image" --allow-import-from-derivation --extra-experimental-features "flakes nix-command" --no-sandbox --accept-flake-config --option sandbox relaxed \
&& docker load --input result && docker run -it --entrypoint bash devnet-xc:latest -c /bin/devnet-xc-fresh 

About nix

Base automatically changed from dz/304 to main August 7, 2023 14:34
github-merge-queue bot pushed a commit that referenced this pull request Aug 7, 2023
…smos (#4019)

- devnet works as before
- added bech32 program to work with keys
- in next PR it to be run
#4028

Required for merge:
- [x] `pr-workflow-check / draft-release-check` is ✅ success
- Other rules GitHub shows you, or can be read in
[configuration](../terraform/github.com/branches.tf)

Makes review faster:
- [x] PR title is my best effort to provide summary of changes and has
clear text to be part of release notes
- [x] I marked PR by `misc` label if it should not be in release notes
- [x] Linked Zenhub/Github/Slack/etc reference if one exists
- [x] I was clear on what type of deployment required to release my
changes (node, runtime, contract, indexer, on chain operation, frontend,
infrastructure) if any in PR title or description
- [x] Added reviewer into `Reviewers`
- [x] I tagged(`@`) or used other form of notification of one person who
I think can handle best review of this PR
- [x] I have proved that PR has no general regressions of relevant
features and processes required to release into production
- [x] Any dependency updates made, was done according guides from
relevant dependency
- Clicking all checkboxes 
- Adding detailed description of changes when it feels appropriate (for
example when PR is big)
@dzmitry-lahoda dzmitry-lahoda added the Misc I marked PR by `misc` label if it should not be in release notes #owned:terraform label Aug 8, 2023
@dzmitry-lahoda dzmitry-lahoda requested a review from mina86 August 8, 2023 09:32
tool

bash

share some config

reorg

good endoug

more steps and plans

in general this is okey

setup

running

scripted

fmt

fix binary name

fmt

fixed nix rot

feat(ibc-cw): tranfer works with examples

compiles proper types

program

writign some nix

so we have noop program

first noop

hoho

gods ofr coding

funds error clarity

funds are here

fmt

tests
@dzmitry-lahoda dzmitry-lahoda marked this pull request as ready for review August 8, 2023 09:39
@dzmitry-lahoda dzmitry-lahoda changed the title feat(ibc-cw): transfer works with examples feat(ibc-cw): correct transfer programs encoded and step closer to final execution Aug 8, 2023
@dzmitry-lahoda dzmitry-lahoda requested a review from mina86 August 8, 2023 11:32
mina86
mina86 previously approved these changes Aug 8, 2023
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

Misc I marked PR by `misc` label if it should not be in release notes #owned:terraform

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants