Skip to content

chore: review EIP-7917 deterministic proposer lookahead#7937

Merged
ensi321 merged 1 commit into
nc/eip-7917from
nflaig/eip-7917-review
Jun 9, 2025
Merged

chore: review EIP-7917 deterministic proposer lookahead#7937
ensi321 merged 1 commit into
nc/eip-7917from
nflaig/eip-7917-review

Conversation

@nflaig

@nflaig nflaig commented Jun 9, 2025

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

Review #7902

@nflaig nflaig requested a review from a team as a code owner June 9, 2025 11:41
@nflaig nflaig force-pushed the nflaig/eip-7917-review branch from 99af4f6 to be0474d Compare June 9, 2025 11:42
@codecov

codecov Bot commented Jun 9, 2025

Copy link
Copy Markdown

Codecov Report

Attention: Patch coverage is 0% with 4 lines in your changes missing coverage. Please review.

Project coverage is 55.72%. Comparing base (5cda0cb) to head (be0474d).
Report is 1 commits behind head on nc/eip-7917.

Additional details and impacted files
@@             Coverage Diff              @@
##           nc/eip-7917    #7937   +/-   ##
============================================
  Coverage        55.72%   55.72%           
============================================
  Files              832      832           
  Lines            59309    59308    -1     
  Branches          4563     4565    +2     
============================================
+ Hits             33049    33051    +2     
+ Misses           26193    26190    -3     
  Partials            67       67           
🚀 New features to boost your workflow:
  • ❄️ Test Analytics: Detect flaky tests, report on failures, and find test suite problems.
  • 📦 JS Bundle Analysis: Save yourself from yourself by tracking and limiting bundle sizes in JS merges.

@ensi321 ensi321 merged commit cb0e5ab into nc/eip-7917 Jun 9, 2025
16 checks passed
@ensi321 ensi321 deleted the nflaig/eip-7917-review branch June 9, 2025 12:10
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants