Skip to content

reverse Identifier for comparisons #200

@ericbuckley

Description

@ericbuckley

Summary

When using jaro-winkler to compare strings, more weight is put into the details at the front of the string rather than at the back. With Identifier, the current string format is "type:authority:value". We should put more weight into the value, as to not inflate scores that are matching identifiers with just the same type.

Acceptance Criteria

  • Reverse the Identifier string when yielding from feature_iter

Details / Tasks

The new format of identifiers should be "{value}:{authority}:{type}"

Metadata

Metadata

Assignees

Labels

bugSomething isn't working

Type

No fields configured for Bug.

Projects

No projects

Milestone

Relationships

None yet

Development

No branches or pull requests

Issue actions