Detailed blame.#1320
Conversation
Codecov ReportAttention: Patch coverage is
Additional details and impacted files@@ Coverage Diff @@
## master #1320 +/- ##
==========================================
- Coverage 85.42% 85.41% -0.02%
==========================================
Files 178 178
Lines 13394 13400 +6
==========================================
+ Hits 11442 11445 +3
- Misses 1952 1955 +3 ☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry. |
|
Logfiles from GitLab pipeline #216583 (:white_check_mark:) have been uploaded here! Status and direct links: |
|
I seem to be getting additional backtrace output sometimes (tested on BB5 with file from #1279 and command 28: Source: "", line 0, in
27: Source: "", line 0, in _start
26: Source: "", line 0, in
25: Source: "/gpfs/bbp.cscs.ch/data/project/proj16/jelic/nmodl/src/main.cpp", line 589, in mainCan the first 3 in the above be removed? |
|
We could, though the more magic we add the more likely it is to break on us; and it's just a debugging assistant. Maybe I'm too complacent, but it feels like there's often junk at the top of a backtrace. In fact after writing the whole reply I noticed, that I have 4 lines of spam. They're definitely part of a backtrace I guess it helps identify the beginning of a backtrace :) If we want to make it more compact there's better ways: The backtraces for each of the commands that lead to a string being printed to the requested line, often have a lot in common: a) they share most of the outer traces; b) |
NMODL Repo SHA: BlueBrain/nmodl@64cf627
No description provided.