Correctly set conductances when using NONSPECIFIC_CURRENT#1218
Conversation
This comment has been minimized.
This comment has been minimized.
3f50659 to
7d4b887
Compare
Codecov ReportAttention: Patch coverage is
Additional details and impacted files@@ Coverage Diff @@
## master #1218 +/- ##
==========================================
- Coverage 86.58% 86.52% -0.06%
==========================================
Files 176 176
Lines 13045 13071 +26
==========================================
+ Hits 11295 11310 +15
- Misses 1750 1761 +11 ☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry. |
This comment has been minimized.
This comment has been minimized.
TODO somehow transmit information to the jacobian maybe? Otherwise, this works...
This reverts commit 98464be.
This comment has been minimized.
This comment has been minimized.
This comment has been minimized.
This comment has been minimized.
|
Associated PR for updating references: BlueBrain/nmodl-references#7 |
|
Also a question for the reviewer: should I add a test for this feature? |
This comment has been minimized.
This comment has been minimized.
|
For future reference, when using the If we wanted to inline the setting of the diagonal/conductances (that is, place them in
Unfortunately, this would require modifying code generated by NOCMODL as well, so it seems that for now we need to keep using |
|
Logfiles from GitLab pipeline #203066 (:white_check_mark:) have been uploaded here! Status and direct links: |
Attempt at fixing #1190