feat: enhance CI by adding slow unit tests and coverage reporting#2605
feat: enhance CI by adding slow unit tests and coverage reporting#2605
Conversation
Summary of ChangesHello @robfrank, I'm Gemini Code Assist1! I'm currently reviewing this pull request and will post my feedback shortly. In the meantime, here's a summary to help you and other reviewers quickly get up to speed! This pull request significantly enhances the project's continuous integration pipeline by introducing a more efficient test execution strategy and improved reporting mechanisms. It achieves this by intelligently separating slow-running unit tests from the main test suite, thereby accelerating feedback cycles for developers. Concurrently, it integrates robust reporting for both test results and code coverage, offering a clearer and more comprehensive view of the project's health and quality directly within the CI environment. Highlights
Ignored Files
Using Gemini Code AssistThe full guide for Gemini Code Assist can be found on our documentation page, here are some quick tips. Invoking Gemini You can request assistance from Gemini at any point by creating a comment using either
Customization To customize Gemini Code Assist for GitHub experience, repository maintainers can create a configuration file and/or provide a custom code review style guide (such as PEP-8 for Python) by creating and adding files to a Limitations & Feedback Gemini Code Assist may make mistakes. Please leave feedback on any instances where its feedback is incorrect or counter productive. You can react with 👍 and 👎 on @gemini-code-assist comments. If you're interested in giving your feedback about your experience with Gemini Code Assist for Github and other Google products, sign up here. You can also get AI-powered code generation, chat, as well as code reviews directly in the IDE at no cost with the Gemini Code Assist IDE Extension. Footnotes
|
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Code Review
This pull request effectively enhances the CI workflow by separating slow-running unit tests. The use of JUnit's @Tag("slow") is appropriate and has been consistently applied to several long-running tests, which will help in speeding up the regular test cycle. The changes are well-organized and clear. I have one minor suggestion to improve code cleanliness.
Coverage summary from CodacySee diff coverage on Codacy
Coverage variation details
Coverage variation is the difference between the coverage for the head and common ancestor commits of the pull request branch: Diff coverage details
Diff coverage is the percentage of lines that are covered by tests out of the coverable lines that the pull request added or modified: See your quality gate settings Change summary preferencesFootnotes
|
This pull request improves the test workflow by splitting slow-running unit tests from standard ones and updating the GitHub Actions configuration to report and upload test results. Additionally, several tests are now explicitly marked as "slow" using JUnit tags, allowing for more granular test execution and reporting.
CI Workflow Improvements:
.github/workflows/mvn-test.ymlfile is updated to:-DexcludedGroups=slowand introduce a separateslow-unit-testsjob to run only tests tagged as "slow".dorny/test-reporterand uploading coverage reports as artifacts for easier access and review.Test Suite Organization:
ACIDTransactionTest,CRUDTest,RandomTestMultiThreadsTest,RandomDeleteTest,RecordRecyclingTest,LSMTreeIndexTest,TypeLSMTreeIndexTest) now import and use@Tag("slow")from JUnit to mark specific long-running tests. This enables selective execution and improves CI performance. [1] [2] [3] [4] [5] [6] [7] [8] [9] [10] [11] [12] [13] [14] [15] [16]