Recentering Host Siblings, Reimagining Partnerships: A Case Study on Reciprocity and Equity in Study Abroad Programs
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.36366/frontiers.v37i3.846Keywords:
Culture brokers, homestay, host siblings, nested community of practice, reciprocity, study abroadAbstract
This article places young people at the center of knowledge production in study abroad programs. We employ a combination of relational learning and nested community of practice to demonstrate the significant roles that local young people play in cultural exchange, despite the usual marginalization by their parents and other local figures of authority. Using St. Lawrence University-Kenya Semester Program (SLU-KSP) as a case study, we interrogate the disconnects between program design and actual practice in study abroad. The data used in the paper were collected using a combination of methods from more than forty rural host siblings aged between 18-30 years. They were from two different ethnic communities in rural Kenya that have hosted our American undergraduate cultural exchange students for more than ten years. We argue that study abroad practitioners should embrace a cyclical model of cultural exchange and recognize the multilayered nature of local host communities. This would maximize the synergies present, manage expectations, and achieve desired reciprocity towards sustainable partnerships. Our paper therefore contributes to the existing theories on host communities by looking at the host family as a nested community of practice with partly interdependent social categories. Each of these categories, however, has its own agency, domain of knowledge and practices.
Abstract in SwahiliMakala haya yanawaweka vijana kwenye kiini cha uzalishaji wa maarifa katika programu za kusoma ughaibuni. Tunatumia mseto wa ujifunzaji wa kihusiano na jamii iliyojengeka katika shughuli ili kuonyesha majukumu muhimu ambayo vijana wa eneo hilo hutekeleza katika mabadilishano na maingiliano ya kitamaduni, licha ya kutengwa kwa kawaida na wazazi wao na viongozi wengine wa eneo husika. Kwa kutumia Programu ya Muhula wa Kenya ya Chuo Kikuu cha St. Lawrence (SLU-KSP) kama mradi wa kutafitiwa, tunahoji mitengano kati ya muundo wa programu na mambo halisi yanayofanyika katika programu za kusoma ughaibuni. Data zilizotumika kwenye makala haya zilikusanywa kwa kutumia mchanganyiko wa mbinu kutoka kwa ndugu wenyeji zaidi ya arobaini wa vijijini wenye umri wa kati ya miaka 18-30. Walitoka katika jamii mbili tofauti katika maeneo ya mashambani nchini Kenya ambao wamekuwa wenyeji wa wanafunzi wetu wanaosomea shahada ya kwanza kutoka Marekani wa mabadilishano ya kitamaduni kwa zaidi ya miaka kumi. Tunajadili kuwa wataalamu wa masomo ya ughaibuni wanapaswa kukumbatia mtindo wa mduara wa mabadilishano ya kitamaduni na kutambua matabaka mengi ya jamii za wenyeji. Hii ingeongeza mashirikiano yaliyopo, kudhibiti matarajio, na kufanikisha usawa unaotarajiwa kuelekea ubia endelevu. Kwa hivyo makala yetu inachangia nadharia zilizopo kuhusu jamii wenyeji kwa kuiona familia mwenyeji kama jamii iliyojengeka katika shughuli iliyo na kategoria za kijamii zinazotegemeana kwa kiasi fulani. Kila moja ya kategoria hizi, hata hivyo, ina wakala wake, uwanda wa maarifa na shughuli.
Downloads
References
Abbink, J. (2005). Being young in Africa: The politics of despair and renewal. In Jon Abbink & Ineke van Kessel (Eds.), Van-guard or vandals: Youth, politic and conflict in Africa (pp. 1–34). Brill. https://doi.org/10.1163/9789047407003_006
Brown, M.F. (2008). Cultural relativism 2.0. Current Anthropology, 49(3), 363-383. https://doi.org/10.1086/529261
Brown, N. (1992). Beach boys as culture brokers in Bakau town, the Gambia. Community Development Journal, 27(4), 361-370. https://doi.org/10.1093/oxfordjournals.cdj.a038626
Burke, C. (2000). They cut Segametsi into parts: Ritual murder, youth and the politics of knowledge in Botswana. Anthropological Quarterly, 73(4), 204-214. 10.1353/anq.2000.0009
Christiansen, C., Mats, Utas., & Henrik, E.V. (Eds.), (2006). Navigating youth, generating adulthood: Social becoming in an African context. Nordic Africa Institute.
Davies, B. (1991). The concept of agency: A feminist poststructuralist analysis. Social Analysis: The International Journal of Anthropology, 30, 42-53. https://doi.org/10.1080/09540250600667892
Davis, B., & Coryell, J. E. (2020). Relationships, participation, and characteristics of a community of practice in short-term adult study abroad. Adult Learning, 31(1), 17–26. https://doi.org/10.1177/104515951984990
Dostilio, L. D., Brackmann, S. M., Edwards, K. E., Harrison, B., Kliewer, B. W., & Clayton, P. H. (2012). Reciprocity: Saying what we mean and meaning what we say. Michigan Journal of Community Service Learning, 19(1), 17. http://hdl.handle.net/2027/spo.3239521.0019.102
Durnham, D. (2000). Youth and the social imagination in Africa: Introduction to parts 1 and 2. Anthropological Quarterly, 73 (3), 113-120. 10.1353/anq.2000.0003
Erbstein, N., London, K. J., Poudel, R. B., & Katwal, S. (2022). Authentic collaboration and active commitment to equity: An evolving case of centering marginalized voices in education abroad. Frontiers: The Interdisciplinary Journal of Study Abroad, 34 (3),73-93. https://doi.org/10.36366/frontiers.v34i3.676
Ficarra, J. (2019). "Producing the global classroom: Exploring the impact of US study abroad on host communities in San Jose, Costa Rica and Florence, Italy. [Unpublished Doctoral Dissertation]. Syracuse University. https://surface.syr.edu/etd/1041
Gee, J. P. (2004). Discourse analysis: What makes it critical? In Rogers, R. (Eds.), An introduction to critical discourse analysis in education (2nd ed., pp. 49–80). Routledge.
Hartman, E. (2015). Fair trade learning: A framework for ethical global partnerships. In M. A. Larsen (Ed.), International Service Learning: Engaging Host Communities (pp. 215-234). Routledge.
Heidebrecht, L., & Balzer, G. (2020). Decolonial experimentations in international service learning research and practice: Learnings from Mayan Indigenous host communities. Michigan Journal of Community Service Learning, 26(1), 143-159. https://doi.org/10.3998/mjcsloa.3239521.0026.109
Honwana, A., & De Boeck, F., (Eds.). (2005). Makers and breakers: Children and youth in postcolonial Africa. Africa World Press.
Jezewski, M., & Sotnik, P. (2001). Cultural brokering: Providing culturally competentservices to foreign born persons. Center for International Rehabilitation Research Information and exchange. http://cirrie.buffalo.edu/china.html
Labov, W. (1966). The Social Stratification of English in New York City. Center for Applied Linguistics. https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511618208
Long, K., Benavides, M., Gott, T., & Azubuike, C. (2022). Critical commitments to partnership in global service-learning. Michigan Journal of Community Service Learning, 28(2),33-49. https://doi.org/10.3998/mjcsl.3210
Mannheim, K. (1972 [1952]): The problem of generations. In Karl Mannheim (Ed.). Essays on the Sociology of Knowledge (pp. 276-320). Routledge & Kegan Paul.
Mazrui, A. (1996). Language policy and the foundations of democracy: An African perspective. International Journal of the Sociology of Language, 118, 107-124. https://doi.org/10.1515/ijsl.1996.118.107
Ntarangwi, M. (2000). Education, tourism, or just a visit to the wild? African Issues, 28(1-2), 54-60. https://doi.org/10.2307/1167059
Ogechi, N., & Sure, K.(2009). Linguistic human rights and language policy in the Kenyan education system. Organization for Social Science Research in Eastern and Southern Africa (OSSREA). https://doi.org/10.1080/10228195.2011.625038
Páez, D., & McCarty, L. (1997). How to use cultural brokers in educational settings. TESOL Journal, Autumn, 44-45.
Press, I. (1969). Ambiguity and innovation: Implications for the genesis of the culture broker. American Anthropologist, 71(2), 205-217. https://doi.org/10.1525/aa.1969.71.2.02a00010
Reynolds Whyte, S., Alber, E., & van der Geest, S. (2008). Generational connections and conflicts in Africa: An introduction. In E. Alber, S. van der Geest, & S. Reynolds Whyte (Eds.)., Generations in Africa: Connections and conflicts (pp. 1-23). Beiträge zur Afrikaforschung. 10.1111/j.1099-0860.2009.00252.x
Robinson, P. & Brown, H. (1994). Developing an approach to integrated study in a non-western context: The St. Lawrence University Kenya Semester Program. In Lloyd, A. & Samatar, A. (Eds.), African Studies and the undergraduate curriculum, 231-243. Lynne Rienner.
Schroeder, K., Wood, C., Galiardi, S., & Koehn, J. (2009). First, do no harm: Ideas for mitigating negative community impacts of short-term study abroad. Journal of Geography, 10(3), 141–147. https://doi.org/10.1080/00221340903120866
Schumake, J., & Wendler Shah, R. (2017). Reciprocity and power dynamics: Community members grading students. Reflections: A Journal of Community-Engaged Writing and Rhetoric, 17(2), 5–42.
Simon, J., & Ainsworth, J. W. (2012). Race and socioeconomic status differences in study abroad participation: The role of habitus, social networks, and cultural capital. ISRN Education. https://doi.org/10.5402/2012/413896
Sommers, M. (2012). Stuck: Rwandan youth and the struggle for adulthood. University of Georgia Press.
Thomas, N. (2000). Children, family and the state: Decision making and child participation. Palgrave Macmillan.
Wairungu, M., Carotenuto, M., & Kabocha, N. (2022). African homestays and community engagement: A case study on reciprocity and neocolonialism. Frontiers: The Interdisciplinary Journal of Study Abroad, 34(3) 141–167. https://doi.org/10.36366/frontiers.v34i3.679
Wairungu. (2014). "A Language ofmany hats": The rise of Sheng and other linguistic styles among urban youth in Kenya [Unpublished Doctoral Dissertation]. University of Virginia. https://doi.org/10.18130/V3KZ54
Wenger, E. (1998). Communities of practice: Learning, meaning and identity. Cambridge University Press.
Wenger-Trayner, E., & Wenger-Trayner, B. (2015). Communities of practice: A brief introduction [PDF file]. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-280368_644
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2025 WAIRUNGU, NJAU

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.






