Our journal employs a double-blind peer review process to ensure impartiality and maintain high academic standards.

Each submitted manuscript is initially screened by the editorial team for relevance, originality, and compliance with submission guidelines. Eligible manuscripts are then assigned to at least two expert reviewers in the relevant field.

During the review process, both authors and reviewers remain anonymous to each other. Reviewers evaluate the manuscript for scientific quality, clarity, methodology, and contribution to the field.

After completing the review, reviewers provide their recommendation, which may include:

• Accept
• Minor Revision
• Major Revision
• Reject

The editorial team makes the final decision based on the reviewers’ feedback. Authors are notified of the decision along with reviewer comments.

The average duration of the peer review process is approximately 4–6 weeks.

All reviewers are expected to maintain strict confidentiality and provide objective, constructive, and ethical evaluations.