Diese zwei Dokumente habe ich auf der OHCHR.org Webseite gefunden. Eventuell fängt die UN an sich „langsam“ dem Thema anzunehmen, was nicht wirklich viel bedeutet, stehen sie doch ganz zu oberst in diesem schrecklichen inquisitionellen Nationen-Konstrukt. Immerhin je mehr es in die Öffentlichkeit dringt desto besser. Beide Dokumente kommen ohne offizielle UN Briefköpfen, Datum, Unterschriften oder Kontext.
Guterres ist ein hochrangiger Jesuit, eventuell General, also gehört er zur absoluten Spitze der Inquisition. Es nicht zu erwarten, dass die UN oder irgend so eine lächerliche Menschenrechts-Institution effektiv gegen die verdeckte Folter vorgehen wird. Die Christen und Juden haben noch nicht genug mit psychologischen Attacken gemordet. Aus mir unbekannten Gründen sind sie zu den Veröffentlichungen gezwungen und sie werden einige Lippenbekenntnisse, Vertuschungen und Beschönigungen von sich geben während sie weiter den ganzen Planeten todfoltern.
https://www.ohchr.org/sites/default/files/Documents/Issues/Torture/Call/Individuals/Harrassmenttechniques.pdf
Harassment techniques include:
- Surveillance (being followed, electronic surveillance, computer and phone hacking, monitoring all
online activities, and bugging of home)
2.Profiles are built to identify any and all weaknesses and insecurities to be used later. Information often
obtained through sexual partners or trusted people in their lives.
3.Conditioning where victims are sensitised to certain stimuli such as everywhere you go someone will
cough as they walk past you. The goal is to make you self police and then think anyone who coughs is
involved in the harassment. People report of conditioning to include hand gestures, an overt use of
colour in peoples clothing (like everyone you see wearing red) or cars a certain colour or with headlights
on (also known as brighting). - Anchoring where someone will provide false rationales for the harassment. Often many possible
rationales are planted to keep the victim confused and the focus of the harassment cycles from one
possible reason to another round and around so as to keep the victim guessing in a self perpetuating
guessing game where every scenario you are to blame and causes self doubt, fear, intimidation, and
ultimately a cycle of destructive thoughts - Mobbing (or true gangstalking) where everywhere you go you will see an overt display of people
following you and often use words you have been conditioned to or your name to draw your attention - Street theatre where a group will „perform“ an overt activity like a fake confrontation or scenarios
designed to test your reactions. Often takes the form of a couple who position themselves near you and
then have a conversation using many of your conditioned words or pertaining to your particular
situation and sensitivities.
7.The use of directional speakers which have the ability to direct sound to a single individual in a
crowded room. This particular item is ultimately the most used and is often referred to as V2K or Voice
to Skull and is used extensively in the psychological breakdown of the victim. The use initially is to cause
the victim to doubt their sanity and drive them into the mental health system, and later to just torment
and never give the victim a moment of privacy or peace. If they do enter the mental health system, then
harassment escalates dramatically as the victim has now been „discredited“ and can be labeled as
someone with a mental problem if they do speak out about the harassment.
8.The use of electronics to effect your eyesight and balance which was originally developed for the
military and police crowd control called „dazzling“ and even the ability to make you vomit. - Sound campaigns which is a community harassment technique where abnormal levels of sound are
directed at the victim and their home. This includes cars deliberately breaking or accelerating when they
pass, people talking excessively loudly at all hours of the night, amplification of sound using directional
speakers so that external sounds that previously couldnt be heard now can, garbage trucks and other
heavy vehicles, and countless other deliberate tactics
10.Sleep deprivation – this is perhaps one of the most insidious tactics used where victims are woken
multiple times a night and can be kept awake for days at a time. The effects are dramatic and
completely debilitating effecting concentration, mood, irritability, appearance, and significantly impacts
all areas of their life – job performance, relationships, and significantly aids in discrediting the victim as
they appear unorganised, disheveled, and sleeping patterns alter so they may sleep during the day
(where noise campaigns are more effective) and be awake at night (where they can be painted as the
one making noise and being a disruptive member of the community). - Baiting or entrapment where victims are harassed to the point that they lash out and commit a
crime such as assault, break and enter or vandalism, as they try and locate the source of the
harassment. Harassers will actively try to provoke verbal and physical confrontations especially after a
period of sleep deprivation. Or they are prompted into an activity which can then be used as leverage
such as affairs, sexuality, drug use, or other criminal activity. - Gaslighting which is a form of psychological abuse where someone will actively try undermine
victims and to make them doubt themselves so that they lose all self confidence and self esteem and are
therefor easier to manipulate and push toward the mental health pathway. It can be as simlpe as being
told something which they then deny, then telling them how silly they are for thinking they said it, and
turn the lie around into an attack on the person. It can be incredibly effective coming from a trusted
person and before the victim understands what is happening to them.
13.Blackbag jobs is a term when a harasser breaks into a victims property and places something or
deliberately moves something. The purpose is to cause self doubt, and fear that their property is being
accessed which harassers try to then sell as paranoia. - Propaganda and disinformation is also the other key element to suppress knowledge of this practice
as its effectiveness initially requires the victim to be unaware of the existence of gangstalking,
gaslighting, or the electronic technologies such as directional speakers so huge amounts of time are
devoted online to creating disinformation sites which attempt to discredit victims by pushing the mental
health agenda. They achieve this by posing as victims and actively trying to sound crazy so that all
victims are are treated as such. Also by creating websites claiming to help victims and being a resource
for victims to come together and then harassing them to the extent that they lose hope and no longer
reach out for help causing further isolation. - Further to the above, gangstalkers rely on disbelief and discrediting and as such much of the
harassment is designed (at least initially) to mimic mental health issues. They also rely on their abuse
being so extreme, so pervasive, so fundamentally immoral, as to be disbelieved and victims
subsequently resort to photographing, videotaping, and sound recording their everyday encounters to
disprove the countless unfounded claims made against them – especially in relation to gaslighting, which
gangstalkers try to turn around and paint the victims as paranoid or irrational. Victims are made to feel
helpless as every attempt to defend themselves is used against them and when they seek help they are
met with disbelief or open hostility.
https://www.ohchr.org/sites/default/files/Documents/Issues/Torture/Call/NGOs/Advforhumankind2.pdf
AFH Data on Self-Reported Victims of Coordinated Stalking in California
The following data was collected via surveys conducted by the Bay Area Support Group (BASG) and
statewide counts collected by Surveillance Harassment Survivors Alliance (SHSA). The goal of collecting
this information is to provide a data driven picture of coordinated stalking crimes in the state of
California. Much like sexual assault, coordinated stalking crimes are grossly under reported. What follows
is a small sample size of self-reported victims. We are working to apply statistical methodology to
estimate the true population size of victims in the state. Outreach efforts by BASG, Surveillance
Harassment Survivors Alliance (SHASA) and other organizations addressing this issue across the country
are ongoing to provide support to victims that will allow them to come forward and be counted.
There were 417 respondents to the CA statewide survey by SHSA. Stats include the cbsa counts, populations, &
percentage of reported victims accounted for by each core-based statistical areas (cbsa). The census bureau
describes a cbsa as a “U.S. geographic area defined by the Office of Management and Budget that consists of one or
more counties anchored by an urban center of at least 10,000 people plus adjacent counties that are
socioeconomically tied to the urban center by commuting”. 15 observations did not specify location:
cbsa # pop %
Bakersfield, CA 8 851,710 1.92%
Chico, CA 1 220,266 0.24%
Fresno, CA 11 942,904 2.64%
Los Angeles-Long Beach-Santa Ana, CA 232 12,944,801 55.64%
Merced, CA 3 259,898 0.72%
Modesto, CA 1 518,522 0.24%
Napa, CA 4 138,088 0.96%
Oxnard-Thousand Oaks-Ventura, CA 3 831,771 0.72%
Redding, CA 2 177,774 0.48%
Riverside-San Bernardino-Ontario, CA 37 4,304,997 8.87%
Sacramento–Arden-Arcade–Roseville, CA 36 2,158,918 8.63%
Salinas, CA 3 421,898 0.72%
San Diego-Carlsbad-San Marcos, CA 42 3,140,069 10.07%
San Francisco-San Mateo-Redwood City, CA 70 4,335,391 16.79%
San Jose-Sunnyvale-Santa Clara, CA 17 1,865,450 4.08%
San Luis Obispo-Paso Robles, CA 2 271,969 0.48%
Santa Barbara-Santa Maria-Goleta, CA 1 426,878 0.24%
Santa Cruz-Watsonville, CA 6 851,710 1.44%
Santa Rosa-Petaluma, CA 6 220,266 1.44%
Stockton, CA 9 942,904 2.16%
Vallejo-Fairfield, CA 6 12,944,801 1.44%
Visalia-Porterville, CA 2 259,898 0.48%
Yuba City, CA 1 518,522 0.24%
Data demonstrates a correlation between cbsa population size and the frequency of self-reported
victims.
This section provides a detailed look at the experiences of 90 self-reported victims of coordinated stalking
in the Bay Area. This data was collected from surveys solicited by the Bay Area Support Group (BASG).
Criteria for inclusion in the report was that a victim began experiencing coordinated stalking protocols
while a resident of California. Surveys were requested in a long hand format and responses were then
synthesized into simple data categories for analysis. It is important to note that synthesizing data from a
written format will incur some under reporting of experiences. Advocacy for Humankind will be working
to increase sample size, and detail of data collection to provide a more robust reporting mechanism.
Life Effects Data
job loss 17 19%
employment blacklisting 7 8%
loss of family/friend/dating relationships 35 39%
divorce 4 4%
homelessness 8 9%
Isolation 16 18%
financial insecurity 27 30%
relocation 38 42%
job loss employment
blacklisting
loss of social
relationships
divorce
homelessnessIsolation
financial
insecurity
relocation
LIFE EFFECTS
Coordinated Stalking Experiences
followed/surveilled/DED assaults 76 84%
community base stalking 38 42%
vehicular stalked/surveilled 33 37%
workplace mobbing 43 48%
noise campaigns 23 26%
Home and car break-ins 20 22%
smear campaign/slander/character assassination 50 56%
family also experiencing coordinated stalking 14 16%
Victims reported contacting federal or state law enforcement in 66% of the surveys. Of those contacts
only 47% of the time did the victims feel safe and supported enough to request a formal report from the
department they contacted. In those instances where an official report was requested only 54% of the
time were victims successful in filing and obtaining copies of an official report.
GLOSSARY OF TERMS AND RELEVANT TERMINOLOGY
Community based stalking is the use of community websites, apps and organizations to illegally surveil,
follow and harass victims in those communities. Victims are not given due process, notification, or reason
for the abuses. Citizen participants are often manipulated into carrying out these illegal acts via slander
campaigns. In some cases, compensation for these acts solidifies motivation
Coordinated Stalking: occurs when multiple people (both within and outside of the community) conspire
to willfully, maliciously, and repeatedly follow, surveil and harass an individual with the intent of placing
that person in reasonable fear for his or her safety, or that of his or her immediate family. Perpetrators of
these crimes may or may not be known to the victim or necessarily have cohabitated with the victim in
the past or present. Also referred to as stalking by proxy.
Cyber Torture: Cyber-technology used to inflict, or contribute to, severe mental suffering while avoiding
the conduit of the physical body, most notably through intimidation, harassment, surveillance, public
shaming, and defamation, as well as appropriation, deletion, or manipulation of information.
Directed energy devices (DED): are ranged weapons that damage the subject with highly focused energy.
Includes laser, microwaves, and particle beams.
Noise campaign: An orchestrated effort to produce stress in a victim through prolonged exposure to
significant noise levels. Slander campaign. Also known as smear tactic or simply a smear. An effort to
damage or call into question a person’s reputation by propounding negative propaganda. Can be applied
to individuals or groups.
Workplace bullying/mobbing: With participation of colleagues and management, a relentless campaign of
psychological abuse (gossip, criticism, false reporting to management, shunning, gratuitous lack of
cooperation, generally nasty behavior). Daily, ongoing ridicule and humiliation are employed, and
eventually the victim is removed or forced out of the workplace. Workplace mobbing can result in the
subject quitting their job or getting fired.