>>287394853>I don't speak kanji but that fox guy was describing Ryuma's exploits from back in the day. One of my jap friends said its basically the same wording Oda uses for "Void Century"It's kinda "trust me, dude" argument, so let's leave it at that.
>Imu isn't the Gorosei. I thought you meant the Elders. Nusjuro randomly talking about ryuma for no reason makes little sense. Also this is a manga where oda doesn't talk about relevant historical figures unless it was convenient. How long was it since we last heard of Davy Jones? But now hes being talked about all the time.Davy blood importance was hinted by the WG before though. Teach was one of the pictures Imu selected and destroyed back during the Reverie in 2018, and Saturn spoke of Teach's bloodline in the Egghead arc. Imu didn't mention Ryuma or Zoro in his giga sperg-out, Elders also never mentioned Ryuma when they discussed Wano.
>There was a "shanks knight captain" in them which clearly indicates the existence of Shamrock and the HKs. Oda at least conceptualized them. So its not impossible.Knights is such a generic concept, this could have been a total accident. It's kinda like when Oda laughed at people that thought he named Luffy after "Luff", sometimes these things just happen. Heck, by this logic, you should argue this "Romeo" should be a Holy Knight progenitor or something. But you don't. So you recognize the genericity.
>Well nami and vivi have a deep connection to each other (heck some people think they're lesbians) and imu seems to have some sort of connection to lily and oda does love parallels (rocks and roger, luffy and bb, harald and loki)Nami has a deep connection to Lola too. She even said she's like a sister to her IIRC.
>Do we know that? Also this would be in the Void Century so its not like the general public would be aware of him. Also Usopp's lies do have a tendency of coming true lol.But Usopp never said anything about Noland being connected to VC.
