Most posts are friends only. Posts that are of general animal welfare importance or a non-personal nature will remain public.
On a couple of prior posts, I had people commenting that there's some older scifi that's worth reading for disability related input. I haven't gotten to Starship Troopers, but I have read Barrayar and The Warrior's Apprentice. As the library didn't have Cordelia's Honor on audiobook, I started with the 2nd book in the series. (I am now worried that if I go back to read Cordelia's Honor, I'm going to hate Bothari...)
In Barrayar, I was surprised at how much I cared about the characters. I wasn't sure I was going to last through the political wrangling (not my usual speed), but then the coup happened and shit hit the fan and I was hooked.
I really felt for Cordelia, and while I don't have a maternal bone in my body, I understand and empathize with her fierce protectiveness.
Miles, as he spans from the ending scenes of Barrayar to the end of The Warrior's Apprentice is interesting on several levels. I think medical knowledge has moved on a bit, so I had a couple of times where my brain chunked over plot points, but not bad enough to toss me out of the story.
( Spoilers ahoyCollapse )
In Barrayar, I was surprised at how much I cared about the characters. I wasn't sure I was going to last through the political wrangling (not my usual speed), but then the coup happened and shit hit the fan and I was hooked.
I really felt for Cordelia, and while I don't have a maternal bone in my body, I understand and empathize with her fierce protectiveness.
Miles, as he spans from the ending scenes of Barrayar to the end of The Warrior's Apprentice is interesting on several levels. I think medical knowledge has moved on a bit, so I had a couple of times where my brain chunked over plot points, but not bad enough to toss me out of the story.
( Spoilers ahoyCollapse )
After the write-up on current media having few depictions of disabled people, I had one of those uncomfortable moments of cognitive dissonance as I realized I don’t have any disabled characters in my fantasy or scifi work. I have a number of characters (main and secondary) who are disabled in my contemporary fiction.
While trying to figure out why I’ve done that, I could only draw a parallel to how I meditate. My understanding is other people imagine themselves siting and calm to relax. I always imagine myself walking, because the most joyful thing I can think of is to walk without pain, unaided. My real world is a series of coping skills and adjusted goals. It’s a constant balancing act of what I can do versus all the things I want to do. [1] In contrast, my imaginary world is all about doing what I want, when I want, without thinking about the physical toll. There is no cost to consider, no pain to avoid.
I believe that’s carried over into my storytelling. Because my disabilities cause me pain, I tend to view disabilities as a negative influence on life. From having friends with different disabilities and reading autobiographies like GIMP I know that the social model of disability is more prevalent in their lives. They have more problems with external forces- lack of reliable public transport, biases from other people, lack of accessible accommodations- than with their disabilities in their daily lives. Deaf culture is perhaps the most widely known group that does not necessarily seek a cure, just a wider awareness and accommodation of their different needs, such as captioning on movies and transcripts on the news.
In thinking about how I’m not seeing people with disabilities in the fiction I consume, I realized my bias toward fantasizing about being pain free, about getting closer to the ideal in my head may be an internalization of the idea that only people with “normal” bodies are worth talking about.
I do think my subconscious line between my “real world” stories being populated with people like me, and “pretend world” stories being where the technology or magic can heal most anything says more than I realized about how much I continue to resent being disabled, how much the lack of treatment or possible cure plays into my thinking. I erased myself, and people like me, from most of my worlds. I don’t believe I did it out of spite, but rather a hope that some day, there might be a treatment that makes my life easier.
The one disabled character I do remember starting in a fantasy setting, I put aside. This is in part because I tied her pain to the Big Bad, and she became a passive damsel in distress who needed rescuing. That’s putting a horrible spin on the disability. I could have (and may now) write that same protagonist/antagonist pairing where she’s lived with pain all her life, so the antag’s power doesn’t cripple her the way it does others. It’s not that it hurts less, it’s just that she’s spent years ignoring the pain to get things done, so she can still move when others are curled up in fetal balls. (I’m actually a little excited by this old plotline now.)
Additionally, my scifi world with a telepathic ability that syncs up to tech is a perfect setting for hereditary deafness to be almost unremarkable. Heck, it might even be an advantage not to be distracted by the sounds on a starship. I’m not sure; I’ll need to explore the idea. A simple change, to take what I know, what I’ve learned from friends, and slide it into a story where people have the tech to get implants or translators and choose not to, because they don’t need to.
This is also a world where gene manipulation is commonplace. Having someone with a service dog would be relatively easy, once I figure out how low gravity and a few other things would affect a dog’s effectiveness. I could have specially bred dogs live 40 years, be super-intelligent, and provide a sort of buddy comedy flavor to the story.
I don’t know that I’ll succeed in every story going forward, but I do hope that at least some part of my brain will stop asking “How could this worldmake people better eliminate people with disabilities?” and instead try to come up with alternate questions. “Where would people like me be in this society?” or “How would people have adapted this technology (or magic) to help them live independent lives?”
I’ll also admit I’ve been working on a children’s story with the service dog as the point of view character. This was in part because I didn’t want the kid’s disability to be the center of the story, in part because I was talking with my mother about the Hank the Cowdog series, but also because I was facing retiring my service dog. I wanted a way to capture his joy in his work, a way to make it fun to see the world from his eyes.
Maybe I’ll add some scenes from the kid’s point of view, just to see what I can do there. Maybe it’s fine as it is. My writers’ group feedback was mostly wonder at what a dog with a solid set of skills (take, tug, fetch) could get done. Maybe it’s enough to educate while entertaining.
I’ve got a lot of thinking to do. I hope it leads to an improvement in my fiction, and a wider representation of people like me in my own work.
[1] For anyone not aware, Spoon Theory http://www.butyoudontlooksick.com/wpress/articles/written-by-christine/the-spoon-theory/ is one of the better illustrations of these limitations. I don’t have Lupus, but I do a similar sort of energy budgeting to get through daily life.
While trying to figure out why I’ve done that, I could only draw a parallel to how I meditate. My understanding is other people imagine themselves siting and calm to relax. I always imagine myself walking, because the most joyful thing I can think of is to walk without pain, unaided. My real world is a series of coping skills and adjusted goals. It’s a constant balancing act of what I can do versus all the things I want to do. [1] In contrast, my imaginary world is all about doing what I want, when I want, without thinking about the physical toll. There is no cost to consider, no pain to avoid.
I believe that’s carried over into my storytelling. Because my disabilities cause me pain, I tend to view disabilities as a negative influence on life. From having friends with different disabilities and reading autobiographies like GIMP I know that the social model of disability is more prevalent in their lives. They have more problems with external forces- lack of reliable public transport, biases from other people, lack of accessible accommodations- than with their disabilities in their daily lives. Deaf culture is perhaps the most widely known group that does not necessarily seek a cure, just a wider awareness and accommodation of their different needs, such as captioning on movies and transcripts on the news.
In thinking about how I’m not seeing people with disabilities in the fiction I consume, I realized my bias toward fantasizing about being pain free, about getting closer to the ideal in my head may be an internalization of the idea that only people with “normal” bodies are worth talking about.
I do think my subconscious line between my “real world” stories being populated with people like me, and “pretend world” stories being where the technology or magic can heal most anything says more than I realized about how much I continue to resent being disabled, how much the lack of treatment or possible cure plays into my thinking. I erased myself, and people like me, from most of my worlds. I don’t believe I did it out of spite, but rather a hope that some day, there might be a treatment that makes my life easier.
The one disabled character I do remember starting in a fantasy setting, I put aside. This is in part because I tied her pain to the Big Bad, and she became a passive damsel in distress who needed rescuing. That’s putting a horrible spin on the disability. I could have (and may now) write that same protagonist/antagonist pairing where she’s lived with pain all her life, so the antag’s power doesn’t cripple her the way it does others. It’s not that it hurts less, it’s just that she’s spent years ignoring the pain to get things done, so she can still move when others are curled up in fetal balls. (I’m actually a little excited by this old plotline now.)
Additionally, my scifi world with a telepathic ability that syncs up to tech is a perfect setting for hereditary deafness to be almost unremarkable. Heck, it might even be an advantage not to be distracted by the sounds on a starship. I’m not sure; I’ll need to explore the idea. A simple change, to take what I know, what I’ve learned from friends, and slide it into a story where people have the tech to get implants or translators and choose not to, because they don’t need to.
This is also a world where gene manipulation is commonplace. Having someone with a service dog would be relatively easy, once I figure out how low gravity and a few other things would affect a dog’s effectiveness. I could have specially bred dogs live 40 years, be super-intelligent, and provide a sort of buddy comedy flavor to the story.
I don’t know that I’ll succeed in every story going forward, but I do hope that at least some part of my brain will stop asking “How could this world
I’ll also admit I’ve been working on a children’s story with the service dog as the point of view character. This was in part because I didn’t want the kid’s disability to be the center of the story, in part because I was talking with my mother about the Hank the Cowdog series, but also because I was facing retiring my service dog. I wanted a way to capture his joy in his work, a way to make it fun to see the world from his eyes.
Maybe I’ll add some scenes from the kid’s point of view, just to see what I can do there. Maybe it’s fine as it is. My writers’ group feedback was mostly wonder at what a dog with a solid set of skills (take, tug, fetch) could get done. Maybe it’s enough to educate while entertaining.
I’ve got a lot of thinking to do. I hope it leads to an improvement in my fiction, and a wider representation of people like me in my own work.
[1] For anyone not aware, Spoon Theory http://www.butyoudontlooksick.com/wpress/articles/written-by-christine/the-spoon-theory/ is one of the better illustrations of these limitations. I don’t have Lupus, but I do a similar sort of energy budgeting to get through daily life.
Jim Hines asked about representation in fiction. http://jimhines.livejournal.com/717967.html I got to thinking about disabilities and, by extension, service dogs. Because I'm curious, Wiki http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Race_and_ethnicity_in_the_United_States says there's 15% Hispanic and Latino, 13% African American, and http://www.disabled-world.com/disability/statistics/census-figures.php says the disabled are about 12% of the US population (36 million of us).
According to http://www.glaad.org/whereweareontv13 “Of the 796 overall regular characters on broadcast primetime... People of color will once again make up 23% of all regular characters, while just 1% will be depicted as people with disabilities.” That's 8 characters (and Ironside was cancelled shortly after this report, so that's one less.) Also, the word “depiction” is key. Many times characters with disabilities are not played by actors with disabilities.
On a more personal note, I grew up loving scifi and fantasy. Sadly, the message from so many of these stories is that disabilities are evil, or that becoming disabled will make you more evil. From scars to wheelchairs, being disabled made you the bad guy most of the time (See Two Face/Harvey Dent in Chris Nolan's Batman universe). It's why people joked about Dick Chenney being Dr. Evil when they saw him in a wheelchair.
The Bond villains and their henchmen rank fairly high on the disabilities are evil scale. Dr. No's metal hands, Blofield's scarred face and wheelchair (though his face clears up with later films, I believe he's the archetype for scarred face and/or wheelchair = evil), Renard's brain injury (bonus facial scar) that makes him feel no pain, etc. ad nauseam, on through to Le Chiffre's off colored, scarred eye and Raoul Silva's disfigured jaw.
Outside Bond, Captain Hook is missing a hand, Darth Vader is revealed to be using a ventilator and life support system after severe burns, Freddy Krueger's got burn scars, Captain Ahab and Long John Silver have peg legs....
It becomes a shorthand for the audience: if a character is not physically perfect, they'reprobably evil.
( I had more to say on this subject than I thought I would.Collapse )
According to http://www.glaad.org/whereweareontv13 “Of the 796 overall regular characters on broadcast primetime... People of color will once again make up 23% of all regular characters, while just 1% will be depicted as people with disabilities.” That's 8 characters (and Ironside was cancelled shortly after this report, so that's one less.) Also, the word “depiction” is key. Many times characters with disabilities are not played by actors with disabilities.
On a more personal note, I grew up loving scifi and fantasy. Sadly, the message from so many of these stories is that disabilities are evil, or that becoming disabled will make you more evil. From scars to wheelchairs, being disabled made you the bad guy most of the time (See Two Face/Harvey Dent in Chris Nolan's Batman universe). It's why people joked about Dick Chenney being Dr. Evil when they saw him in a wheelchair.
The Bond villains and their henchmen rank fairly high on the disabilities are evil scale. Dr. No's metal hands, Blofield's scarred face and wheelchair (though his face clears up with later films, I believe he's the archetype for scarred face and/or wheelchair = evil), Renard's brain injury (bonus facial scar) that makes him feel no pain, etc. ad nauseam, on through to Le Chiffre's off colored, scarred eye and Raoul Silva's disfigured jaw.
Outside Bond, Captain Hook is missing a hand, Darth Vader is revealed to be using a ventilator and life support system after severe burns, Freddy Krueger's got burn scars, Captain Ahab and Long John Silver have peg legs....
It becomes a shorthand for the audience: if a character is not physically perfect, they're
( I had more to say on this subject than I thought I would.Collapse )
The box had a tuperware of biscotti for humans (which I set down to
( Read more...Collapse )
I took 50 photos, so if you want to see the out-takes, and those not used photos, they should be here:
https://picasaweb.google.com/116002700670940980552/SecretSantaPaws2012?authuser=0&feat=directlink
Neil Gaiman's giving away a short story, and every download is a dollar toward a charity. Check out www.audible.com/ScareUs the promos on til the 31st.
I started this back in late January, and I've worked on it off an on as I could beat down the "OMG, this is horrid!" mental critic. I haven't painted anything I really cared about in a long while (flowers in matching color schemes for Mom's decorating's been about it).
But when I saw this picture
housedog had on her blog, and her description, it fell into the WANT TO PAINT pile.
Housedog: Sodai, posing as the Sacred Cave Guardian Inari.

( and it all sprang from there... the photo essay with 9 photosCollapse )
But when I saw this picture
Housedog: Sodai, posing as the Sacred Cave Guardian Inari.

( and it all sprang from there... the photo essay with 9 photosCollapse )
Hope you're all having as much fun as the bitches! Try to stay cool and avoid getting burned by explosives.
I got over 300 photos of the pack, I'll be posting a few collections.
Wordy Wednesday: Why is it that when I try to get photos of Twist looking regal, she gives me Weirdo!Puppy photo ops?
( photos of doofus dogCollapse )
Wordy Wednesday: Why is it that when I try to get photos of Twist looking regal, she gives me Weirdo!Puppy photo ops?
( photos of doofus dogCollapse )
Eye exams for service dogs, certified therapy dogs, police K9s, search and rescue dogs are free in May if you register this month at http://acvoeyeexam.org/2012/animals/qualifications.shtml and there's a participating eye vet near you. It's how I found out Duncan's got suture line cataracts, and how we found the eye vet I went to when I found the little scleral tumors. They've opened it up a bit from graduated from program only to in training with a program or IAADP members. I've told the lady I work with who works with the local SAR group, and I'm hoping to spread the word as much as I can.
Comments