Fani Willis in Trump’s RICO Case Threatens to Violate Rights of Defendants Because She’s Not Ready For Trial

It looks like the attorneys for a number of the defendants are starting to work their magic against GA DA Fani Williams in the mega trial of the century with 19 defendants. Several of them already are wanting out of the pageant planned by Williams with a separate trial, some a Federal trial and some demanding a speedy one as well. As for Willis, it appears she is not prepared and that puts the icing on the cake. The screw turns and it is a sight to behold. 

Former Trump campaign lawyer Sidney Powell and lawyer Kenneth Chesebro have asked to formally separate their cases from the sprawling indictment in Georgia that accuses former President Donald Trump and 18 co-defendants of attempting to overturn the results of the 2020 election. We learn that

Both Powell and Chesebro were granted requests for speedy trials and Chesebro’s trial has been ordered to begin on Oct. 23

Here we go:

Fulton County District Attorney Fani Willis is now threatening defendants in Trump’s RICO case because she is not prepared for trial.

Earlier this month Fani Willis hit President Trump and 18 others with RICO and conspiracy charges for daring to challenge the 2020 election.

A Fulton County grand jury returned a 41-count indictment which included RICO and conspiracy charges against Trump.

 

There are 30 unidentified unindicted co-conspirators.

Sidney Powell and Ken Chesebro invoked their right to a speedy trial.

These requests mean the co-defendants have to sever their cases from other defendants.However, President Trump wants to delay his trial and also requested his case be severed from the other defendants.

Citing four cases, Fani Willis threatened all of the defendants after Chesebro and Powell requested speedy trials.

“By filing a statutory speedy trial demand, the Defendants elected to proceed to trial without the benefit of the type of prior notice of the State’s discovery and similar transaction evidence that would have otherwise been afforded to them,” Fani Willis said, according to The Messenger.

Fani Willis filing

However, according to attorney Techno Fog, the cases Fani Willis cited have nothing to do with Trump’s RICO case:

DA Willis: They can’t argue they are entitled to notice of similar transaction evidence 10 days before trial.

But – the law requires 10 days. And the case she cites does not prohibit any arguments in case that 10 day requirement is violated

“False representation to the Court makes DA Willis guilty of the same conduct she accuses the defendants.” Techno Fog said.

“It’s a violation of Ga. Code Ann. § 16-10-20.1 (false statement to Court)” he said.

H/T: Gateway Pundit

She also can’t deny or withhold discovery. She is the poster child of Soros style affirmative action.

The House GOP is making a move as well.

Representative Jim Jordan has announced a probe into DA Fani Willis to see whether she arrested Donald Trump in Georgia after colluding with Jack Smith, Federal DOJ employees under Biden or used any federal tax money on a state trial. Subpoena’s could be used if needed. Also, internet sleuths have found old Facebook posts from DA Fani Willis questions the election in Georgia and election integrity. The very thing she has indicted Trump for, she herself did.

This on the heels of my post yesterday that was distressing to say the least. It was regarding the civil trial which is a sleeper.

In other words, asking the judge to find Trump guilty himself before the actually trial.

Here is her thoughts on the matter:

“Based on the undisputed evidence, no trial is required for the Court to determine that Defendants presented grossly and materially inflated asset values in the SFCs [financial statements] and then used those SFCs repeatedly in business transactions to defraud banks and insurers,” James wrote.

“Notwithstanding Defendants’ horde of 13 experts, at the end of the day this is a documents case, and the documents leave no shred of doubt that Mr. Trump’s SFCs do not even remotely reflect the ‘estimated current value’ of his assets as they would trade between well-informed market participants,” the motion said.

The very worst of the swamp.