CA Fires of Hell – Thank Moonbeam Brown for Cutting Forest Management Budget

 

A previous post of mine needed to be updated what with the kerfuffle over Trump’s remark regarding the fires in California and the “blow back” from the firefighters complaining about his remark. Let’s take a look from B-ville last Summer. Note the word arson has been stricken from any conversation.

UPDATE:

In September 2016, Governor Brown vetoed SB 1463, a bill in the California legislature which would have required the California Public Utilities Commission to prioritize areas at increased risk from overhead wires in their management of wildfires.

Also note the infamous Delta Smelt budget was not cut… this endangered specie causing the water shutdown thus causing the drought in the lush farmland of  Central California.

For more see

CA fires of hell – thank Obama and the environmentalists

 

Think about it. Will the media report this?

 

Dr2n0ClV4AAVNDG

As California burns, many Californians have been asking why the dramatic increase in wildfires in the last five years? Except for Governor Jerry Brown. Governor Brown claims that devastating fires are the “new normal.” Supporting Obama-era regulations have resulted in the new normal: an endless and devastating fire season.

What’s the significance of 2012?

Obama-Era Eco-Terrorism through Environmental Regulations

Under Agriculture Secretary Tom Vilsack, “the Obama administration finalized a rule governing the management of 193 million acres of national forests and grasslands, establishing a new blueprint to guide everything from logging to recreation and renewable energy development,” The Washington Post reported in 2012. “The rule will serve as the guiding document for individual forest plans, which spell out exactly how these lands can be used.”

These Obama-era regulations introduced excessive layers of bureaucracy that blocked proper forest management and increased environmentalist litigation and costs — a result of far too many radical environmentalists, bureaucrats, Leftist politicians and judicial activists who would rather let forests burn than let anyone thin out overgrown trees or let professional loggers harvest usable timber left from beetle infestation, or selectively cut timber.

In a 2016 Townhall column, Paul Driessen explains:

Eco-purists want no cutting, no thinning – no using fire retardants in “sensitive” areas because the chemicals might get into streams that will be boiled away by conflagrations. They prevent homeowners from clearing brush around their homes, because it might provide cover or habitat for endangered species and other critters that will get incinerated or lose their forage, prey and habitats in the next blaze. They rarely alter their policies during drought years.

The resulting fires are not the “forest-rejuvenating” blazes of environmentalist lore. They are cauldron-hot conflagrations that exterminate wildlife habitats, roast bald eagle and spotted owl fledglings alive in their nests, boil away trout and trout streams, leave surviving animals to starve, and incinerate every living organism in already thin soils … that then get washed away during future downpours and snow melts. Areas incinerated by such fires don’t recover their arboreal biodiversity for decades.

Read the full thing over at the  Daily Wire  that covers the works on this terrible practice.

A comment by Skip Patel

Italy, Israel and Greece have I.D.’d our Musim friends as the cause of their infernos. (Have you noticed that the US Media no longer mentions the “A” word? ARSON!

Here’s an oldie but goodie from the U.S. Marines (2005):

PYRO-TERRORISM—THE THREAT OF ARSON INDUCED FOREST FIRES AS A FUTURE TERRORIST WEAPON OF MASS DESTRUCTION

ROBERT ARTHUR BAIRD – MAJOR ROBERT ARTHUR BAIRD UNITED STATES MARINE CORPS
https://www.hsdl.org/?view&did=10020

ISIS, Al Qaeda and similar humanitarian groups have been posting Arson Instructions in their glossy magazines for over a decade.

ISIS Details Devastation of California Wildfires in Caliphate Newsletter https://is.gd/qHmTsK

ISIS calls for ‘arson jihad’, singles out Texas megachurch in latest magazine http://bit.ly/2jvExBq

Al Qaeda Magazine Calls for Firebomb Campaign in Montana & US https://is.gd/dfx9It

 

Coakley refused to press charges against Creepo Priest

Brown- Coakley Mass Senate Race could get closer with this slow leaking story getting out into the media.This no less from the Daily Kos– Surprising this isn’t hitting the charts by now. story posted started back in Nov. Tax and Spend is the least of it– Protect our children!

Mass. Senate race: Coakley made deal with Father Geoghan in 1995

Today’s Boston Globe reported that Coakley declined to press charges against notorious pedophile Father John Geoghan, despite allegations that he fondled three underage boys.

Dirk McQuigley’s diary :: ::

Coakley in 1995 was serving as the head of the Middlesex County sex crimes unit. She opted to give Geoghan one year of probation even though three boys told investigators that the priest fondled them and made threatening phone calls to their homes.

Over a 30-year career in six parishes, Geoghan was accused of sexual abuse involving more than 130 children. Charges were brought in Cambridge concerning accusations of a molestation that took place in 1991. Geoghan was defrocked in 1998. He was found guilty in January 2002 of indecent assault and battery for grabbing the buttocks of a 10-year-old boy in a swimming pool at the Waltham Boys and Girls Club in 1991, and was sentenced to nine to ten years in prison.

Advocates for victims of clergy abuse ripped Coakley’s behind closed doors secret agreement:

“What Martha Coakley did in 1995 I would consider negligent from the point of view of the public good,’’ said A.W. Richard Sipe, a former priest and psychotherapist who has written extensively about clergy sexual abuse. “Even if it was a misdemeanor, once you put it in the public eye, that’s what starts people coming forward.’’

Indeed, that is exactly what happened. A year after Coakley’s secret deal, the mother of the three boys filed a civil suit. According to reporter Michael Rezendes, news stories recounting some of the details of the suit, including the allegation that Geoghan asked the boys if they had sexual contact with their mother, prompted additional victims to step forward with similar stories.

http://www.dailykos.com/story/2009/11/23/807273/-Mass.-Senate-race:-Coakley-made-deal-with-Father-Geoghan-in-1995

http://hotair.com/archives/2010/01/08/ma-senate-ad-paints-coakley-as-tax-and-spend-liberal/

Massachusetts Senate: Coakley 50%, Brown 41%, 7% undecided

Well wouldn’t this be a swell way to defeat Obamacare!!
Even if Coakley wins by just a small margin, a message will be delivered. And the National Republican party? Where are you?? Another NY23?? Lets rock and roll on this one!! We need the Tea Party Express!~ and a super turnout of conservatives– we can do this!!
A new Rasmussen Reports telephone survey of likely voters in the state finds Coakley ahead of Brown 50% to 41%. One percent (1%) prefer some other candidate, and seven percent (7%) are undecided.

The special Senate election will be held on January 19 and special elections typically feature low turnout. That’s one reason the race appears to be a bit closer than might typically be expected for a Senate race in Massachusetts.

However, as is the case nationally, those who feel strongly about the bill are more likely to be opposed. The overall figures include 36% who Strongly Oppose the plan while 27% Strongly Favor it.

http://hotair.com/archives/2010/01/05/democratic-heir-to-ted-kennedy-leads-republican-challenger-by-nine-points/

http://www.rasmussenreports.com/public_content/politics/elections2/election_2010/election_2010_senate_elections/massachusetts/election_2010_massachusetts_special_senate_election