Get unlimited access to Crikey. Now 50% off.

Create a free account, or log in

Assange’s ‘hacking’ indictment the crime of protecting a whistleblower

Julian Assange did what any good journalist should do: minimise his source’s chances of being found out. But that is now conspiracy to commit a crime in the eyes of the US government.
Chelsea Manning

For years, Julian Assange’s opponents argued that the rationale for his remaining in the Ecuadorean embassy in London — that the United States would seek to extradite him in relation to the Chelsea Manning material the moment he left the building — was false. Assange just wanted to avoid facing allegations of sexual assault in Sweden, they insisted — however inconsistent, strange and politicised the process around those allegations actually was — and the possibility of extradition to the US was a fiction, a distraction.

Keep reading for free.

Create an account to unlock more stories or subscribe to get unlimited access to all articles, Crikey Daily's full edition experience and the early morning Worm newsletter. Support independent journalism and stay informed with a Crikey subscription — no ads, no paywalls, no limits.

Keep Reading

Create a free account

Unlock this article with bonus extended access for all logged in readers.

BEST VALUE OFFER

$199$99/year

Save 50% on 12 months of unlimited access and no ads. Renews at $199/year. Cancel anytime.