AST Blog
CAST2026 Call for Speakers Open!
CAST 2026 CALL FOR SPEAKERS - Open Now!We are looking for cross-functional, quality focused experts like you to join our team of speakers for CAST 2026. Whether you are a seasoned speaker or looking...
2025-2026 AST Board Elected!
The 2025 board elections have completed and we are pleased to announce your 2025 - 2026 newly elected members: The new members will be transitioning into their roles over the next few weeks and...
AST Now Approved Provider for IEEE Continuing Education Credits
We’re thrilled to announce that CAST 2025 is now IEEE-accredited!
That means when you join us this August, you’ll not only gain hands-on learning from some of the best minds in testing and quality—you’ll also earn Professional Development Hours (PDHs) to keep your certifications current
AST 2025 – 2026 Board Election Nominations are Open!
From the start AST has always been built by people who care enough to step up... those brave individuals who didn’t wait for someone else to fix things, but raised their hand and said, “I’ll help.”...
AST Newsletter – June 2025
Summer is in full swing with exciting stories, tips, and updates from across the AST universe including the latest on CAST 2025!
Your CAST 2025 Value Proposition
Investing in professional development is essential, but we know that getting approval to attend a conference can sometimes be a challenge. If you're looking to attend CAST 2025 (August 25-27 in Salt...
CAST2025 Call for Speakers
CAST 2025 CALL FOR SPEAKERS - Open Now!We are looking for testing experts like you to join our team of speakers for CAST 2025. Whether you are a seasoned speaker or looking to submit for the first...
CAST 2025 Super Early Bird Registration Open!
CAST 2025 Super Early Bird Registration is Open!!! This is your opportunity to get the best pricing as an AST Member! Hurry and secure your spot to the most exciting Quality and Testing event of...
Tactics for sharing community learnings at work
Consume If you’re anything like me, you read a lot, blogs and books, listen to loads of podcasts, and watch a bunch of talks and maybe even attend the odd workshop. I’ll throw in a quick list of resources I consume from shortly. Not everything I consu…
2024-2025 AST Board Elected!
The 2024 board elections have completed and we are pleased to announce your 2024 - 2025 member elects: The new members will be transitioning into their roles over the next few weeks...
Press Releases
AST and BCS Peer Conference Considers Whether the Public Should Care About Software Testing
“It’s our contention that most people don’t think very much about software development and software testing, despite software being deeply embedded in almost all aspects of our lives.”
SAN FRANCISCO, CALIF. AND LONDON, UNITED KINGDOM (PRWEB) JANUARY 22, 2021
The Association for Software Testing (AST) and The BCS Special Interest Group in Software Testing (SIGIST) have released a joint report that suggests the public should be deeply invested in the quality of software, if not necessarily the discipline of software testing. The public is constantly exposed to risks from poor software quality, including in life-critical contexts.
Software impacts our world in so many ways it is hardly worth enumerating, but the newest risks are enough to require serious examination. Machine learning algorithms are exploding in use as their cost and difficulty to implement plummet, preventing even the people implementing them from truly understanding their inner workings and predicting their outputs, by their very nature. Social media is fracturing our society with these generated algorithms, and we do not yet know how that story ends.
Data sets used to train these algorithms are both deliberately and inadvertently simplified and carelessly selected, baking in biases and blind spots. These algorithms are being aggressively married with audio and video surveillance in public spaces, workplaces, and educational settings. Vehicle automation may yet prove to be safer per mile than manual control in the aggregate, but that is little comfort when contemplating the rush to deploy fully automated vehicles on our streets, seas, and for air travel. Robotics and further automation against machine learning outputs will introduce risks we do not yet fully appreciate.
The public must be able to trust that experts have exercised good judgement about where, what, how, why, and when to test, that this testing has been conducted by skilled and curious testers with sufficient subject matter expertise, and testing results are properly communicated to and consumed by decision makers who decide whether or not and when to release software. This testing must center users and the public, not just commercial considerations.
The report proposes three approaches for establishing public trust — push, publicise, and punish. Pushes are applied up front to influence behaviour during the development of a product, publication puts information into the public domain to help consumers ask the right kinds of questions, and punishments discourage undesirable behaviour and introduce additional practices to attempt to prevent similar problems in the future.
Regulations codifying testing process standards are usually proposed as counterweights to the commercial pressures to release software as soon as it appears to work correctly, under expected conditions – at least for the most important use cases. Standards can fit into all three categories of push, publicise, and punish, but they can be difficult to broadly apply and may contribute to goal displacement by optimizing testing for generating proof that records of prescribed activities exist, as opposed to optimizing for deep examination and thoroughness in testing.
In the software testing community, there has been controversy over the ISO 29119 standard for software testing. The report notes that if a testing standard is expected to be a proxy for a product quality standard, then it is risking trying to drive software development from the back of the bus. Narrow standards intelligently applied for specific subject matter or contexts could be very helpful. Broad standards applied without consideration of context can be unhelpful or worse.
The Association for Software Testing (AST) is an organization for and by professional software testers that is creating community, boosting careers, and promoting the science and craft of software testing. Learn more at https://associationforsoftwaretesting.org
The BCS Special Interest Group in Software Testing (SIGIST) is the software testing specialist group of the British Computer Society. SIGIST promotes the importance of testing, develops an awareness of good practices recognised within the industry, represents the interests of the Group’s members with other bodies, encourages research into testing, promotes high standards of professionalism and excellence within testing, and promotes diversity within the industry generally. Learn more at https://www.bcs.org/membership/member-communities/software-testing-specialist-group/