I did not read the book. Since HAARP would be a sideroad of the story, I am certain it is not mentioned. The author is not Norwegian, but Polish. She, Nina Witoszek, works as a professor at the University of Oslo. Lately I have written an email to the Norwegian "Steigan" and asked if they maybe had some information about the Norwegian "HAARP", named EISCAT. Especially because they write a lot about the war in Ukraine, NATO, etc. and the subject has always been binned as a conspiracy theory. While the facts are scientifically proven true. HAARP is an electromagnetic war weapon. They pretend, they: all related with a with a HAARP system comparable technical "something", so, again, they pretend all is for science. It is a cover-up of an extremely dangerous war weapon. All what I hear in the media, in high standard discussions between political scientists analysing the war, and naming what sort of war weapons are used (Over The Horizon radars, for instance, are part of it) then I know that Dr. Nick Begich was right when he wrote the book: "Angels Don't Play This HAARP". and later the tutorial about it, that dates from 2006: 24 subtitles, to be found in this collection https://multerland.blog/2024/04/21/haarp/
I never received an answer. When I tried to open a discussion about it on X, Twitter (I closed my profile there, I was shadow banned, I am too critical and anti NATO, not anybody reacted. Norway seems to be afraid to say something about it. That is my perception of that neglection of my question about EISCAT. It is about science, not nonsense. It is about too much to silence it.
I did not read the book. Since HAARP would be a sideroad of the story, I am certain it is not mentioned. The author is not Norwegian, but Polish. She, Nina Witoszek, works as a professor at the University of Oslo. Lately I have written an email to the Norwegian "Steigan" and asked if they maybe had some information about the Norwegian "HAARP", named EISCAT. Especially because they write a lot about the war in Ukraine, NATO, etc. and the subject has always been binned as a conspiracy theory. While the facts are scientifically proven true. HAARP is an electromagnetic war weapon. They pretend, they: all related with a with a HAARP system comparable technical "something", so, again, they pretend all is for science. It is a cover-up of an extremely dangerous war weapon. All what I hear in the media, in high standard discussions between political scientists analysing the war, and naming what sort of war weapons are used (Over The Horizon radars, for instance, are part of it) then I know that Dr. Nick Begich was right when he wrote the book: "Angels Don't Play This HAARP". and later the tutorial about it, that dates from 2006: 24 subtitles, to be found in this collection https://multerland.blog/2024/04/21/haarp/
I never received an answer. When I tried to open a discussion about it on X, Twitter (I closed my profile there, I was shadow banned, I am too critical and anti NATO, not anybody reacted. Norway seems to be afraid to say something about it. That is my perception of that neglection of my question about EISCAT. It is about science, not nonsense. It is about too much to silence it.