user avatar
Nate Fischer
New Founding
@NateAFischer
Founder and investor. CEO @NewFounding: a venture firm focused on American revitalization
Dallas, TX
Joined February 2009
Posts
  • user avatar
    Very proud of my 7yo son—when his 3yo brother fell into deeper water and struggled, he jumped to action and executed a perfect rescue.
    00:00
  • user avatar
    This is obviously false. The French Revolution only a few years later shows what a leftist revolution would look like. That the American Revolution took such a different course shows how different the underlying motives and values were.
    Conservatives will never admit this but it is true. The founding fathers were the radical leftists of their time. The way the average con feels about crazy leftist transgender activists today is the way the average con of the 1700s felt about American Revolutionists.
  • user avatar
    This guy was on the National Security Council and does not recognize a phishing scam.
    The timing, right before the election is very troubling. This can be an effort to silence critics of @realDonaldTrump and Elon. Can someone tell me if this is legit?
    Readers added context
    Eight different vendors rate the weblink as malicious or as phishing. Do not go to that site. virustotal.com/gui/url/668ad6…
  • user avatar
    No surprise Lankford would rush to change the subject:
    01:05
    Sen Lankford is asked to respond to Stephen Miller’s comments about law enforcement aggressively pursuing leftwing organizations that foment violence. He immediately goes into “both sides” mode and leads off his reply talking about white supremacy.
  • user avatar
    We must denaturalize, deport, and ostracize the mayor and all who support him. They are not Americans, and they should not be welcome in America.
    BREAKING: A Dearborn resident opposed naming a street after Hezbollah supporter Osama Siblani. Mayor Abdullah Hammoud snapped back: “You do not belong in this city, Islamophobe! Get out, you are not welcome here.”
    00:00
    Open Source Intel
  • user avatar
  • user avatar
    Pence opposes RFK Jr because of “abortion.” Yet he refused to support Trump over Kamala despite her extreme abortion position. I’ve sensed that social conservatism is often used as a pretext to defend legacy institutions.
    Pence, in a rare statement, opposes RFK Jr. at HHS: "For the majority of his career, RFK Jr. has defended abortion on demand during all nine months of pregnancy, supports overturning the Dobbs decision and has called for legislation to codify Roe v Wade. If confirmed, RFK, Jr.
  • user avatar
    This is what they would have done to Trump and his supporters if he had lost. We cannot risk letting these people take power again.
    Brazil is sending its election denier to prison for 27 years. We sent ours back to the White House. Brazil already lived under military dictatorship and saw the threat clearly. We failed to protect our democracy. We need to learn from Brazil before it’s too late.
    New York Times

Opinion
Guest Essay

Brazil Just Succeeded Where America Failed
  • user avatar
    Someone who went to Harvard Law School actually posted this:
  • user avatar
  • user avatar
    If they all claim Trump said this and he still wins, that means he has an electoral mandate to carry it out.
  • user avatar
    We cannot give Big Tech this level of power over public discourse.
    YouTube has barred One America News Network from posting new videos for a week and stripped it of its ability to make money off existing content after the channel uploaded a video promoting a phony cure for COVID-19. axios.com/youtube-tempor…
  • user avatar
    Musk seems to have cracked down on child porn in his first weeks at Twitter. It’s worth asking why this wasn’t done sooner.
    The culture at these Silicon Valley companies is profoundly disturbing. I believe there are exceptionally high rates of pedophilia and other perverse sexual fetishes among their employees—and an even larger share willing to enable this agenda.
  • user avatar
    Mass deportations would: a) drop demand for and thus price of housing, transferring value from legacy owners to new buyers, and b) drop supply of labor and thus raise wages, transferring value from retirees to workers.
    No one is able to describe any specific program that would result in the desired redistribution of assets from boomers to zoomers. So it's just empty emoting. Do you tax the boomers to build new subsidized homes? Do you somehow seize their existing homes? What's the plan?