Use these ten principles to guide research evaluation, urge Diana Hicks, Paul Wouters and colleagues.
This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution
Access options
Subscribe to this journal
Receive 51 print issues and online access
202,72 € per year
only 3,97 € per issue
Buy this article
- Purchase on SpringerLink
- Instant access to the full article PDF.
39,95 €
Prices may be subject to local taxes which are calculated during checkout
References
Wouters, P. in Beyond Bibliometrics: Harnessing Multidimensional Indicators of Scholarly Impact (eds Cronin, B. & Sugimoto, C.) 47–66 (MIT Press, 2014).
Shao, J. & Shen, H. Learned Publ. 24, 95–97 (2011).
Seglen, P. O. Br. Med. J. 314, 498–502 (1997).
Garfield, E. J. Am. Med. Assoc. 295, 90–93 (2006).
López Piñeiro, C. & Hicks, D. Res. Eval. 24, 78–89 (2015).
van Raan, A. F. J., van Leeuwen, T. N., Visser, M. S., van Eck, N. J. & Waltman, L. J. Informetrics 4, 431–435 (2010).
Waltman, L. et al. J. Am. Soc. Inf. Sci. Technol. 63, 2419–2432 (2012).
Hirsch, J. E. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 102, 16569–16572 (2005).
Bar-Ilan, J. Scientometrics 74, 257–271 (2008).
Butler, L. Res. Policy 32, 143–155 (2003).
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Related links
Related links
Related links in Nature Research
The focus on bibliometrics makes papers less useful 2015-Jan-13
Bibliometrics: Is your most cited work your best? 2014-Oct-29
Publishing: Open citations 2013-Oct-16
Referencing: The reuse factor 2013-Oct-16
Nature special: Science metrics
Nature Outlook: Assessing science
Related external links
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Hicks, D., Wouters, P., Waltman, L. et al. Bibliometrics: The Leiden Manifesto for research metrics. Nature 520, 429–431 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1038/520429a
Published:
Issue date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/520429a