Aleksandra Nik

The role of the website is changing. We used to solve people’s problems with text. Now, that text is moving to ChatGPT and AI Overviews. Your site should still be a source for that content—but for actual visitors, the experience needs to be something else. Not just text and images. Not just static pages. Think: 👉 Tools instead of words. 👉 Interactive instead of passive. 👉 Personalized instead of generic. This is the real reason someone will choose to come to your site. And video—on your site and off it—is the best way to get your brand across. It’s how you show who you are, your authenticity, your uniqueness. Way more powerful than trying to squeeze that into text. Yes, keep optimizing for SEO and for AI. But focus just as much on the new experiences you’re creating on your site—because that’s where your brand really comes alive.

17

2 Comments

As a new founder, your to-do list is overflowing. Between product development, fundraising, and team building. Visual branding may often take a back seat. Most stop at a logo. If you are coming from academia, your experience with visuals is probably limited to scientific posters and manuscript figures. Building a cohesive identity that represents your research or company is a whole new challenge. If you already have a logo, here are a few more branding elements worth setting up to create consistency and a strong visual identity. #lifesciencemarketing #sciencemarketing #brandguideforsciencecompanies 

13

In the age of AI, the debate around attribution is all too often framed as a contest between faculties: algorithm versus eye; system versus sensibility. This framing misses the point. The real question is not whether artificial intelligence can authenticate art more accurately than humans can, but what kind of authority we are willing to grant to an agent that is incapable of responsibility. When AI claims to 'discover' a Caravaggio or a Rubens, it does more than propose a hypothesis — it redistributes power from lived expertise towards computational plausibility and from judgement towards probability. The problem runs deeper, in a misunderstanding of connoisseurship itself. It is not a science, but a discipline of situated judgment shaped by prolonged looking, historical immersion, and material familiarity. Connoisseurs do not compare images; they establish coherence between style, material, provenance, and gesture. Their authority is cumulative and accountable, measured not by infallibility but by the willingness to assume responsibility for error. AI operates according to a completely different logic. It reduces perception to computation, translating images into numerical patterns. While this can be illuminating as an auxiliary tool, a comparative lens or a method of exclusion, it remains perceptually bounded. It does not engage with the work itself, but rather processes its representation. Its competence depends on quality, standardisation and scale — conditions that are rarely met where oeuvres are finite and styles are fluid. Like forensic science, AI can help rule things out, but it cannot affirm authorship meaningfully on its own. The greater danger lies in the seductive illusion of algorithmic certainty. AI delivers judgements without hesitation, simulating objectivity in a domain that depends on interpretation. Yet hesitation here is not a sign of weakness, but of ethics. Attribution carries legal, financial and historical significance. Human experts carry that weight personally: their credibility and their names are at stake. An algorithm risks nothing — it makes claims without exposure and offers certainty without consequence. In a market of shrinking supply and rising stakes, this certainty is appealing. However, convenience is not rigour. What appears to be technological progress can lead to substitution, replacing discernment with probability and responsibility with automation. Therefore, the question is not whether to use AI, but how to place it: as auxiliary intelligence, not autonomous authority. The future of authentication lies in an ecosystem where tools sharpen perception without replacing judgment. What resists digitisation is not data, but discernment—the ethical act of standing behind what one sees. Art does not require perfect answers; it requires custodians willing to assume imperfect ones. The link to the article: https://lnkd.in/dCUVkWsS

16

5 Comments

I recently wrote a piece exploring how generative AI tools like Midjourney and DALL·E are shaping the way we visualize the future — and not always in a good way. While these tools are incredible at producing polished, compelling images, if also sometimes nonsensical and surreal. I’m noticing a pattern: the futures they depict often feel recycled, overly nostalgic, and rooted in the past. In the article, I dig into why that might be happening and what it means for designers, creatives, and anyone thinking about the future. If we’re not careful, AI slop could end up narrowing our imagination instead of expanding it. Would love to hear your thoughts — are you seeing the same thing in your work?

15

2 Comments

Can #AI truly understand our emotions -and help predict what we need in therapy? A new study in Frontiers in #Psychiatry used AI to analyse hundreds of real therapy sessions, showing that the emotions we express -like anger, fear, curiosity, and approval -can predict how well we respond to therapy and how strong our connection with a therapist becomes. It’s a powerful reminder that both our struggles and our moments of curiosity and surprise shape our mental health journeys! At Maxim VR, we’re building on these insights. By combining emotion-aware AI with immersive VR, we create safe, stigma-free spaces where young people can explore difficult feelings and become the heroes of their own mental health stories. It’s not about replacing therapists -it’s about giving every young person the tools and agency to feel, reset, and grow on their own terms. Emotional growth doesn’t have to be heavy. With the right technology, it can be playful, interactive, and deeply personal 🎮 Link to article summary in comments! #MentalHealthTech #AIinTherapy #YouthWellbeing #MaximVR #EmotionalIntelligence #DigitalHealth

12

1 Comment

I’m guilty. And I’m happy about that. There is a growing narrative online that we are “going too far” with AI. That we are replacing skills. That we are relying on models instead of mastering our craft. That using AI too often somehow dilutes authenticity or weakens your brand. But here is the part nobody wants to say out loud ↓ The bigger risk is falling behind. Not because AI is a trend. But because AI is now the infrastructure of modern marketing. If you ignore it, your costs rise. Your output slows. Your competitors accelerate. And your business pays for inefficiency you can no longer justify. Three uncomfortable truths every business leader needs to hear: 1️⃣ ⇢ AI is not removing roles. It is removing waste. The time you used to spend planning, drafting, revising and formatting can now be handled in minutes. This is not about replacing people. It is about redirecting them to higher-value work that actually moves the business. 2️⃣ ⇢ The companies resisting AI are already being outpaced by the ones embracing it quietly. Not because they are posting AI content every day. But because they are using AI behind the scenes to: • cut production costs • accelerate workflows • improve accuracy • drive faster decision-making These are competitive advantages, not trends. 3️⃣ ⇢ The danger is not “going too far”. The danger is missing the shift entirely. AI has become the backbone of: • content systems • visibility pipelines • customer experience • internal communication • creative production The cost of ignoring it is far higher than the cost of integrating it. You do not get ahead by avoiding the tools that are defining the next decade. You get ahead by learning how to use them responsibly, strategically and with clear intent. Overusing AI is not the issue. Using it without direction is. Not using it at all is the real risk. I’m helping business owners learn how to use AI to create smarter, faster, more human content, follow along here ▶️ Melissa ❌ Mitchell if you want to do the same!

54

63 Comments

AI & Creativity – Keynote at the ArtTech Fusion 25 in Ho-Chi-Minh-City 🇻🇳   AI solves routine tasks, but can it also help with creative tasks?   Yes, but only if humans use AI as a partner in a meaningful way (AUGMENTED CREATIVITY). In my keynote speech, I presented the concept of augmented creativity and introduced use cases from the fields of brand management, research, and art.   Augmented creativity has great potential and causes the following positive effects, among others: ✅ AI as a creativity tool ✅ Expansion of creative boundaries ✅ Democratization of creativity ✅ Emergence of new jobs   But the advent of AI in the creative field also has a dark side. Among other things, the following negative effects are to be expected: ❌ Transparency dilemma, algorithm aversion, and blurring boundaries ❌ Design Fixation and “more of the same“ ❌ Algorithmic Bias ❌ Loss of creative jobs ❌ Intellectual property and legal concerns

17

4 Comments

OpenAI and Studio Ghibli style: Theft or homage? This week's episode of Modem Futura explores how OpenAI's new image generator is stirring up old questions about art, authorship, innovation, and a whole lot more. (This image was intentionally not generated using Studio Ghibli style -- it does, however, demonstrate how well OpenAI's new image generator handles text -- and the number of fingers on a hand!) https://lnkd.in/gaU-nzEB

20

2 Comments

Google doesn't care about pretty websites - it cares about relevance. 🔍 That stunning website you just paid thousands for? Google doesn't see the beautiful design, custom animations, or perfect color palette. What it does see: words, structure, loading time, and user behavior. I've watched countless businesses invest everything in aesthetics while completely neglecting the elements that actually determine their ranking. Then they wonder why they're buried on page 7 of search results behind competitors with "uglier" sites. Here's what Google actually prioritizes in 2025: 1️⃣ Content that answers real questions Google's primary goal is delivering the most relevant answer to a search query. Period. Your content needs to thoroughly address the questions your ideal clients are asking. 2️⃣ Strategic keyword placement Keywords still matter—but they need to appear naturally in your headers, opening paragraphs, and throughout your content. Stuffing keywords unnaturally will actually hurt your ranking. 3️⃣ User experience signals Google tracks how people interact with your site. If visitors click but immediately bounce back to search results, Google sees that as a sign your content didn't deliver. 4️⃣ Technical foundation Site speed, mobile optimization, and secure connections (HTTPS) are non-negotiable ranking factors. A beautiful site that loads slowly is a ranking disaster. Don't get me wrong—design matters for converting visitors once they land on your site. But it's essentially invisible to search algorithms. The websites dominating search results in 2025 aren't necessarily the prettiest—they're the ones that provide the most comprehensive, relevant answers to their audience's questions. Want to see how your website stacks up? Comment "AUDIT" and I'll send you a free analysis of what's working and what needs improvement. ✚ Follow Samantha Hawrylack, MBA for all things SEO, copywriting, email marketing, content marketing, and digital growth. I'm on a mission to help brands scale with data-driven marketing strategies that generate massive visibility and effortless sales while having lifestyle freedom.

55

58 Comments

 𝗔𝗜 𝗰𝗮𝗻’𝘁 𝗿𝗲𝗽𝗹𝗮𝗰𝗲 𝗲𝗺𝗼𝘁𝗶𝗼𝗻𝗮𝗹 𝗿𝗲𝘀𝗼𝗻𝗮𝗻𝗰𝗲—𝗶𝘁 𝗰𝗮𝗻 𝗼𝗻𝗹𝘆 𝘀𝗵𝗮𝗿𝗽𝗲𝗻 𝗼𝘂𝗿 𝗮𝗯𝗶𝗹𝗶𝘁𝘆 𝘁𝗼 𝗰𝗿𝗲𝗮𝘁𝗲 𝗶𝘁. 𝘉𝘶𝘵 𝘰𝘯𝘭𝘺 𝘸𝘩𝘦𝘯 𝘪𝘵’𝘴 𝘭𝘦𝘥 𝘣𝘺 𝘱𝘦𝘰𝘱𝘭𝘦 𝘸𝘩𝘰 𝘶𝘯𝘥𝘦𝘳𝘴𝘵𝘢𝘯𝘥 𝘵𝘩𝘦 𝘩𝘦𝘢𝘳𝘵 𝘰𝘧 𝘵𝘩𝘦 𝘣𝘳𝘢𝘯𝘥. That’s a core theme I explore in my upcoming episode of the "𝗟𝗶𝘃𝗶𝗻𝗴 𝗮 𝗥𝗲𝘃𝗲𝗻𝘂𝗲 𝗖𝘂𝗹𝘁𝘂𝗿𝗲" podcast, with Rick McPartlin where we dive into what it really takes to build lasting growth in a world that’s evolving fast. Here’s the thing: AI is incredible at surfacing patterns, speeding up output, and scaling reach. But the brands that will 𝘸𝘪𝘯 aren’t the ones cranking out more content. They’re the ones using tech to 𝗿𝗲𝗶𝗻𝗳𝗼𝗿𝗰𝗲 𝘁𝗿𝘂𝘀𝘁, 𝗿𝗲𝗮𝗱 𝗲𝗺𝗼𝘁𝗶𝗼𝗻𝗮𝗹 𝘀𝗶𝗴𝗻𝗮𝗹𝘀, and 𝗿𝗲𝘀𝗽𝗼𝗻𝗱 𝗶𝗻 𝗵𝘂𝗺𝗮𝗻 𝘄𝗮𝘆𝘀. It’s not about replacing the human—it’s about 𝗲𝗻𝗵𝗮𝗻𝗰𝗶𝗻𝗴 𝗵𝗼𝘄 𝘄𝗲 𝗰𝗼𝗻𝗻𝗲𝗰𝘁. ✨ More on this (plus my take on brand clarity, revenue alignment, and what growth looks like now) in the upcoming episode. On Spotify, Apple, and more. How are you using AI to deepen connection—not just speed up output? WE ARE THE BOARD  #RevenueCulture #StrategicGrowth #BrandStrategy  

22

17 Comments

Is AI enabling our writing or homogenizing it? In my previous post, Anubha Kakroo commented - "we need to be able to "think" to use AI" . This reminded me of The New Yorker article, that said using AI to write your articles means you're writing what everybody else's thoughts are. You're not unique to your own thoughts. When I write with AI, I'm constantly asking: Is AI influencing how I think, or am I holding on to my perspective and just improving how I communicate it? Because here's what happens when we let AI use our tone and write for us: We lose ownership. Not just of the words, but of the perspective itself. The MIT article mentions about this "cognitive cost" while relying on AI. A test for ownership I use, as suggested in the article: - Can I quote my own post without looking? - Can I stand behind its ideas in a conversation? If not, AI wrote it—I just hit publish. In today's world of AI-perfected content, there's beauty in imperfection. In ideas that are messy, specific, undeniably yours. The New Yorker research linked below 👇 How do you ensure AI is improving your voice—not replacing it? ----------------------------------------------------------------------------- [a sentence from the article that is worrying!] “Human ideas don’t tend to influence what the machine is generating all that strongly,” Kreminski said; ChatGPT pulls the user “toward the center of mass for all of the different users that it’s interacted with in the past.”

13

3 Comments

Why User Experience (UX) is More Important Than Ever UX is today’s most powerful sales strategy. A seamless user journey directly boosts conversions. In 2025, users demand speed, clarity, and ease. Poor UX means lost leads and missed opportunities. Without solid UX, your website might: ➡️ Feel confused about navigating ➡️ Take too long to load ➡️ Look broken on mobile ➡️ Miss clear CTAs ➡️ Lose trust instantly What does that mean for your marketing? ➡️ Low conversion rates from paid traffic ➡️ High bounce rates that kill SEO ➡️ Poor first impressions ➡️ Visitors drop off before engaging ➡️ Your brand looks outdated Prioritize user-first design decisions: ➡️Optimize site speed ➡️ Design for mobile-first users ➡️ Keep layouts clean and logical ➡️ Use clear CTAs ➡️ Guide users step-by-step UX is vital for business growth in today’s crowded market. People choose experiences that are simple, trustworthy, and engaging. #UserExperience, #UXDesign, #ConversionOptimization, #MobileFirst, #WebsiteDesign

68

103 Comments