Science for Good’s cover photo
Science for Good

Science for Good

Political Organizations

Promoting science that serves people, not power.

About us

Science for Good is a new organization by the team behind Stand Up for Science to drive immediate impact and long-term change. We support scientists and advocates at the intersection of science and society, amplify voices, organize campaigns, and build a shared vision for a future where science serves communities.

Website
www.sciforgood.org
Industry
Political Organizations
Company size
51-200 employees
Type
Nonprofit

Employees at Science for Good

Updates

  • Science for Good reposted this

    "Science communication and policy literacy are still treated as side projects. Optional workshops. Unpaid labor. Activities you pursue only if you have the privilege of time or institutional protection. They are rarely valued in hiring, promotion, or grant review. But dismissing public influence as peripheral rather than essential has real consequences. When scientists are absent from public conversations, misinformation fills the space." This article by John Patrick Flores (Science for Good) is RIGHT ON. "Communication should be as foundational to scientific training as statistics or experimental design." #SciComm #ResearchComms https://lnkd.in/eD9V6zRp

  • Science for Good reposted this

    NLS journalist Ellen Delisio is our woman-on-the ground when it comes to covering life science news and trends in the U.S. 🇺🇸 We asked Ellen to pinpoint three major issues in the country right now. Here is her take: 𝟭. 𝗖𝘂𝘁𝘀 𝘁𝗼 𝗹𝗶𝗳𝗲 𝘀𝗰𝗶𝗲𝗻𝗰𝗲 𝗿𝗲𝘀𝗲𝗮𝗿𝗰𝗵 Frustrated and anxious research scientists are fleeing the U.S., driven by cuts to National Institute of Health grants, the main source of funding for research in the U.S. The brain drain is going both ways; scientists from other nations once eager to work in the U.S., now are going elsewhere, lured by ample and consistent funding. According to Nature, between January–March, U.S. scientists applied for 32% more positions overseas than the previous year. Since Donald Trump took office in January 2025, nearly 8,000 research grants have been canceled or frozen and about 25,000 federal scientist and employees have been let go, reported Time magazine. This combined with a growing distrust of science by the public is making for an uncomfortable atmosphere. In response, groups such as Stand Up for Science and Science for Good have arisen to rally support for science and promote education about the benefits of scientific research. 👉 Learn more about them in the recent article "Scientists fighting back": https://lnkd.in/dPnreSzS 𝟮. 𝗔𝗜 𝘄𝗮𝗿𝗶𝗻𝗲𝘀𝘀 Americans continue to view AI warily, with concerns coming from industry, government and the public. While Trump announced shortly after coming into office that he wanted the U.S. to achieve AI supremacy, scientists and others think the field is evolving too quickly and with no guardrails. According to a 2025 Pew poll, about 5x more Americans are concerned about AI as are enthusiastic about it. While some states and communities already have enacted measures to regulate AI, the Trump administration wants to eliminate them, saying they hinder AI advancement. Grassroots organizations are sprouting up across the country urging leaders to slow the AI roll out until more regulations are finalized. Among the public’s fears are that it will eliminate jobs, generate misinformation and diminish human creativity. 𝟯. 𝗔𝗻𝘁𝗶-𝘃𝗮𝗰𝗰𝗶𝗻𝗲, 𝗮𝗻𝘁𝗶-𝘀𝗰𝗶𝗲𝗻𝗰𝗲 𝘀𝗲𝗻𝘁𝗶𝗺𝗲𝗻𝘁𝘀 𝗰𝗼𝗻𝘁𝗶𝗻𝘂𝗲 𝘁𝗼 𝗴𝗿𝗼𝘄 The growing anti-vaccine movement in the U.S. already has serious consequences. By late March 2026, the CDC reported 1,575 confirmed cases of measles, once nearly eradicated, across 32 states. Part of the reason for public skepticism about vaccines is that U.S. Secretary of Health and Human Services, Robert F. Kennedy Jr., who has no medical training, has questioned the safety of vaccines for years and has been outspoken in his views. More parents of newborns reportedly also are declining vitamin K shots – given routinely to infants, to prevent heavy bleeding – erythromycin eye ointment to guard against blindness, and the hepatitis B vaccine usually administered shortly after birth.

    • No alternative text description for this image
  • Science for Good reposted this

    🌍 Ciencia y agenda ambiental: un diálogo urgente ¿Qué habilidades y herramientas poseen los científicos para contribuir a la Agenda Ambiental Global? En un contexto marcado por transformaciones ambientales, sociales y políticas, y por la sobresaturación de información sin fundamento científico —sumada a la rápida propagación de noticias falsas—, acortar la brecha entre ciencia y sociedad es más urgente que nunca. Comunicar la ciencia de manera clara, estratégica y asertiva se ha convertido en una tarea fundamental. Sobre este desafío, comparto la reflexión de John Patrick Flores, cofundador de Science for Good, acerca del papel de la comunicación científica en nuestros tiempos: "When scientists are absent from public conversations, misinformation fills the space" https://lnkd.in/eUM9MYC4

  • Science for Good reposted this

    📢 HHMI’s Janelia Research Campus is #hiring Group Leaders! Apply today to lead a lab at Janelia. We’re looking for early-career scientists who are interested in using theory, computational modeling, and machine learning to advance our understanding of complex biological systems. 🔹 Secure a 5-year renewable appointment 🔹 Pioneer new tools and approaches 🔹 Collaborate across disciplines We encourage applications from late-stage graduate students, postdocs, and early-career researchers who are ready to launch their own lab in an interdisciplinary, collaborative environment. 👉 Apply by Nov. 4: https://lnkd.in/ehWYYXvS #HHMIJanelia #ScienceCareers #MachineLearning #ComputationalBiology

    • No alternative text description for this image
  • Science for Good reposted this

    Never one to turn down a soapbox moment to voice my passion for behavioral and social science researchers finding their place in the broader science landscape. Especially now! Thanks for inviting me to share what we're all about at Science for Good, Consortium of Social Science Associations (COSSA)! 🧑🏼💻🧑🏼🔬

  • SNAP (Scientist Network for Advancing Policy), a group of early career scientists responsible for the McClintock Letter initiative, is organizing congressional visits this August for scientists to meet with representatives while they are in their home states ahead of the FY2026 budget vote. They're helping scientists set up short meetings with their local Members of Congress (in person or over Zoom), with no prior science policy or advocacy experience needed! They handle the logistics and provide training and talking points that you can incorporate, and you can communicate in groups to take some of the pressure off. Are you interested in advocating for federal funding for science? Fill out this form https://lnkd.in/eDt5scQS (by 7/31!)—and feel free to share widely!

  • The National Institutes of Health recently announced a significant change in its grant funding strategy: new proposals that rely solely on animal testing will no longer be supported. Instead, applicants must incorporate computational modeling, artificial intelligence, or other New Approach Methodologies (NAMs) to predict human health outcomes. #NIH #sciencepolicy #BiomedicalResearch #SciencePolicy #AnimalResearch #AIinScience #ResearchInnovation #EthicalResearch

    • No alternative text description for this image
  • The recent NSF Graduate Research Fellowship Program (GRFP) awards highlight a significant shift in U.S. science funding priorities. Historically, the GRFP has supported a wide range of disciplines, with life sciences typically representing about 20% of recipients. However, in the latest round of 500 additional fellowships announced this June, not a single award went to life sciences researchers. Instead, fields such as computer science, physics, and chemistry saw notable increases. What does this data tell us? This realignment appears to reflect broader policy priorities focused on areas like artificial intelligence and quantum information science. While innovation in these fields is critical, it’s important to consider the broader impacts of narrowing funding distribution. Diversity across scientific disciplines fuels innovation and addresses complex societal challenges—from health and environment to social sciences. Reducing support for key fields risks creating significant gaps in our scientific workforce and research portfolio. As the NSF shapes the future generation of scientists, it’s worth reflecting on how these funding decisions influence who can contribute and what questions get prioritized.

    • No alternative text description for this image
    • No alternative text description for this image
    • No alternative text description for this image

Similar pages