QA.tech

Vinicius Dallacqua and Vilhelm von Ehrenheim are representing QA.tech at Agentic Dev Days 🚀 And they’re not alone! More of the team is on-site, connecting, learning, and sharing what we’re building. Daniel Fredrik Olle Hanadi If you’re there, don’t forget to come by and say hi 👋

🚀 One week to go until Agentic Dev Days in Stockholm! This is shaping up to be an incredible event for anyone working with AI and agentic systems and we’re excited to be part of it. Several members of the QA.tech team will be there, representing and connecting with the community. 🎤 Vinicius Dallacqua will be taking the stage 🛠️ Vilhelm von Ehrenheim be hosting a hands-on workshop on closing the agentic loop A big thanks to Robert Westin and AI Engineering In Stockholm for organizing what promises to be a fantastic event. See you there! 🦾 #agenticdevdays

We're #hiring a new Senior Fullstack Engineer in Stockholm, Stockholm County. Apply today or share this post with your network.

Visual PR Testing is live on Product Hunt today 🎉 QA.tech automatically runs dynamic regression and exploratory testing on every PR – validating your changes visually against the preview URL or Vercel build before anyone reviews or merges. Results post back to the PR – with step-by-step failure breakdowns, screenshots, and AI explanations. No selectors to maintain. No flaky scripts. No manual QA pass. 👉 Join the PH celebration: https://lnkd.in/dwSpv_WR

📣 QA teams aren’t broken! They’re just built for a world that’s moving slower than today’s reality. With AI accelerating development, testing has become the bottleneck. Teams are stuck choosing between speed and confidence. That’s changing. QA isn’t disappearing. It’s being restructured. Smaller, more strategic teams, powered by autonomous testing that actually scales. How is your team adapting? Link to blog in comments 👇

🐣 We’re going on an Easter egg hunt… but for bugs 🐞 At QA.tech, we’re on the lookout for companies that want to level up their mobile apps through smart, scalable testing. Think: 📱 Real-device testing 🔍 Finding those hidden “Easter egg” bugs before your users do 🦆 Our (slightly obsessed) bug duck making sure nothing slips through Whether you’re scaling fast or just tired of unexpected crashes, we’d love to team up and make your mobile experience rock-solid. Curious to see what your app is hiding? 👀 Let’s talk.

Our AEs are booked back to back. Inbound demo requests growing 40% month over month. The verification gap is real and teams are starting to act on it. We’re hiring stellar AEs at QA.tech to help drive this. If you want to sell something engineering teams genuinely need, send me a DM.

Building mobile apps? We’re looking for teams that want to improve how they test Android and iOS apps using AI. Curious or know someone who might be? Drop a comment 👇 or reach out to Patrick Lef.

Every time Cursor, Claude Code, or Codex ships a new feature I get more excited. Not because I use them. I do. But because every coding agent that gets better means more code is being written, faster, by more people, with less manual oversight. Composer 2 makes it even faster. And all of that code still has to work. Nobody is asking “but does the product actually behave correctly after this change?” at the same rate code is being produced. The generation side is scaling exponentially. The verification side is not. I think this is the most underpriced gap in the entire AI developer tooling space right now. Everyone is building better code generation. Almost nobody is building independent verification that can keep up. We see it in our own numbers. As our customers adopt coding agents their need for automated verification goes up, not down. More PRs, more changes, more surface area to test. Manual QA was already losing. Now it’s not even an option. The bigger the coding agent wave gets, the more important verification becomes. I think that’s going to be obvious in hindsight.

🚨 We’re hiring an Account Executive at QA.tech 🚨 We’re looking for someone who wants to help shape the GTM motion of an AI startup that’s changing how product teams test and ship software. If you love talking to engineering leaders, understand developer tools, and want to help teams ship faster with more confidence. We should talk. Know someone great? Send them our way 👇 If your recommendation leads to a hire, we’ll reward you with some QA.tech swag: socks 🧦 and stickers (and our eternal gratitude). 📩 Drop a name in the comments or DM me.