ilert seamlessly connects with your tools using our pre-built integrations or via email. ilert integrates with monitoring, ticketing, chat, and collaboration tools.
See how industry leaders achieve 99.9% uptime with ilert
Organizations worldwide trust ilert to streamline incident management, enhance reliability, and minimize downtime. Read what our customers have to say about their experience with our platform.
This article explains why AI-driven automation in incident response is feasible now. Teams can finally safely delegate repetitive and time-critical response tasks to AI Agents, which operate with contextual awareness and human oversight. The result is faster response, higher service uptime, and less alert noise – without losing control.
With these capabilities now being applied during real incidents, questions naturally shift from whether automation is possible to how it should be introduced and governed in practice. The Agentic Incident Management Guide addresses this next step, describing practical frameworks, rollout strategies, and real-world examples that show how SRE and DevOps teams can and automate incident response effectively and safely.
Automation’s false starts
Automation has been a key part of technology strategy for decades. It has been included in countless roadmaps and transformation initiatives, yet truly widespread, AI-powered automation has often failed to meet expectations. Early attempts faced limitations due to fragile tools, a lack of context awareness, and an operational culture that was not ready to trust autonomous systems.
Technology finally caught up
The main reason for today's automation feasibility is the major improvement in AI capability. Automation is no longer restricted to rigid, rule-based scripts. Modern machine learning models, especially large language models (LLMs), provide contextual understanding, probabilistic decision-making, and adaptive learning. This allows automation systems to function in environments that were once too complex or unpredictable.
Equally important is the development of the technology infrastructure. Cloud-native platforms, widespread APIs, and dependable orchestration frameworks give AI instant access to data and control across distributed systems. A decade ago, this connectivity simply did not exist.
Improvements in auto-scaling, observability, and telemetry also reduce risk. Complete visibility, enhanced log correlation, and solid CI/CD pipelines make it feasible to deploy automation at scale while carefully managing the impact and recovery. The result is not only smarter automation but safer automation.
Operational culture evolved
Technology alone is never enough. The second key shift has been cultural. The rise of DevOps and SRE has reshaped how teams think about automation. The same teams that once held back from automating, now see it as a way to ensure consistency, reduce unnecessary work, and speed up results. Blameless postmortems and ongoing improvement methods promote experimentation and iteration, allowing automation to grow and adapt. SRE principles – reducing manual work, managing error budgets, and aligning tasks to Service Level Objectives (SLOs) – naturally support incremental and well-governed automation.
In this environment, AI is not seen as a replacement for engineers but as a partner that enhances human judgment, eases mental load, and allows teams to focus on more important work.
Risk became a first-class design concern
One of the most overlooked enablers of AI-driven automation is the modern approach to risk management. Today's automation frameworks are designed for gradual adoption. Rollouts can be staged, actions can be tracked in real time, and automated rollback strategies have become standard practice. Permissions, policies, and approval workflows are written as code, making rules clear, testable, and repeatable.
Importantly, AI-powered systems now stress observability and explainability. Actions are auditable, reversible, and measurable. This transparency shifts AI from being seen as a black box to a reliable operational partner. With tight feedback loops, teams can assess impact continuously and address issues before they escalate.
The benefits are already materializing
The combination of mature technology, evolved culture, and built-in safeguards means organizations can automate confidently. Teams using AI-driven automation are already experiencing real benefits:
Significantly reduced MTTR, aided by AI-driven root cause analysis and automated fixes
Decreased operational costs, as routine tasks and scaling are managed automatically
Enhanced reliability and consistency, with fewer mistakes made by humans
Increased capacity for innovation, as engineers spend less time on repetitive tasks and more on mission-critical work
The result is faster incident resolution, improved service reliability, and noticeable growth in team satisfaction.
Conclusion
AI-driven automation is viable today not because of a single breakthrough, but because of a rare alignment. Advanced AI capabilities, production-ready infrastructure, DevOps- and SRE-led cultural shifts, and a disciplined approach to risk have matured together.
What comes next is putting that convergence to work in production. ilert’s Agentic Incident Management Guide explores how teams can apply AI-driven automation, controlled and step-by-step, during real incidents. This is where automation moves from aspiration to actuality.
If you’re an SRE, platform engineer, or on-call responder, you don’t need another article explaining incident pain. You feel it every time your phone lights up in the middle of the night. You already know the pattern:
Noisy alerts that drown out real issues
Slow, manual triage
Scrambling through tribal knowledge just to understand what’s happening
You’ve invested in runbooks, automation, observability, and “best practices,” yet incident response still feels like firefighting.
Now imagine the same midnight page, but with AI SRE in place:
A triage agent instantly isolates the one deployment correlated with the CPU spike
A causal inference agent traces packet flows and identifies a library-induced memory leak
A communication agent drafts the root-cause summary
A remediation agent rolls back the offending deployment, all within seconds
What once took hours is now finished in a couple of minutes.
On-call engineers rely on scattered tribal knowledge
Every incident demands human interpretation and context
Modern infrastructure is too distributed, too dynamic, and too interdependent for static runbooks to keep up. The runbook era isn’t “bad,” but it is simply outgrown.
Why incremental automation fails
Most teams start adding scripts, bots, and basic auto-remediation. It feels helpful at first until you realize the complexity outpaces your automations. The complexity of modern infrastructure doesn’t grow linearly, it augments. Distributed architectures, ephemeral compute, constant deployments, and deeply interconnected dependencies create an ever-shifting incident landscape.
Automation often falls short because it’s brittle and struggles to adapt when incidents don’t match past patterns. As scripts decay and alerts accumulate, critical knowledge remains siloed, leaving only experienced ops teams able to distinguish real issues from noise. The result is that humans still spend most of their time triaging and chasing symptoms across fragmented tools. This leads to the firefighter’s trap, where partial automation actually makes manual work harder instead of easier.
Introducing the solution: from firefighting to intelligent response
Teams now need a system that can understand their environment, interpret signals in context, and adapt as conditions change, much like a skilled medical team responding to a patient in distress.
This is the promise of agentic AI for incident response.
Unlike static tools that execute predefined rules, they offer adaptive, context-aware intelligence capable of interpreting signals, understanding dependencies, learning from each incident, and acting in ways that traditional automation cannot.
This brings us to the first major component of the AI SRE.
Context-Aware AI
An AI-driven SRE system introduces capabilities that manual and semi-automated approaches simply cannot achieve. Instead of following rigid, linear rules, the system executes multiple interconnected steps, adapting its behavior as situations evolve. With every incident it helps resolve, the system learns, therefore continuously refining its understanding and responses.
The future of incident response is not about replacing humans, but about amplifying human expertise. AI takes on the tedious, noisy, and cognitively exhausting work that engineers should not have to carry, allowing them to focus on what truly matters. Humans remain essential. Just as doctors rely on automated monitors to track vital signs while they concentrate on diagnosing the underlying condition, agentic AI manages constant background signals so engineers can apply judgment where it has the greatest impact.
Once a system reaches this level of understanding, a new question emerges: how does it operate across complex, interconnected environments, where a visible symptom often originates from an entirely different part of the “body”?
This brings us to the second major component of the system: the shift from linear incident pipelines to a dynamic, interconnected Incident Mesh.
The “incident mesh”
Imagine incidents as signals in a living network. Problems propagate, mutate, and interlink across services. Agentic AI embraces this complexity through an Incident Mesh model. Instead of flowing through a queue, incidents become interconnected nodes the system maps and manages holistically.
This mesh model allows:
Dynamic reprioritization as the scenario unfolds.
Localized “cellular” remediation rather than global, blunt-force actions.
Real-time learning and adaptation, with each resolved incident refining future responses.
Each agent owns a slice of the puzzle, much like a medical response team, with triage nurses, surgeons, and diagnosticians working together, not in sequence. This multi-agent approach only works if the underlying system is built to support it. Specialized agents need a way to collaborate, communicate, and hand off tasks seamlessly. And achieving that demands an architecture built from the ground up for multi-agent intelligence.
Blueprint: Architecting for agentic AI
Agentic AI isn’t a single bot but a coordinated system of focused, cooperating agents. Here’s what mature teams are already deploying:
Modular agent clusters: Root-cause analysts, fixers, and communicators act in concert.
Data-first architecture: Normalize (unify) logs, traces, tickets; protect data privacy via strict access controls and masking.
Event-driven orchestration: Incidents are broken down into subtasks and dynamically routed to the best-fit agent.
Built-in observability: Every agent’s action is tracked; feedback loops drive continuous improvement.
Human-in-the-loop fallbacks: For ambiguous, high-risk scenarios, the system requests confirmation before action.
This isn’t theory: these patterns are emerging right now at engineering-first organizations tired of “spray and pray” automation.
Breaking adoption paralysis: How to start the shift
Once teams understand what agentic AI is, the next hurdle is adoption, and many teams get stuck here. It’s easy to fall into endless evaluation cycles, feature comparisons, or fears about ceding control.
Real progress starts simple:
Audit your incident response flow. Log time spent on triage vs. diagnosis vs. remediation. What’s still manual? Where is knowledge siloed?
Pilot agentic AI where toil is greatest. Start with routine but painful incidents – think cache clears, noisy deployment rollbacks, mass log parsing. Keep scope narrow and fully observable.
Demand clarity. Choose frameworks where every agent’s action is logged, explainable, and reversible. No magic.
Continuously calibrate autonomy. Don’t flip the switch to autonomous everything. Iterate, review, and let trust grow from real wins.
Measure what matters most. Actual MTTR, alert reduction, and drop in human hours spent firefighting – not vanity metrics.
Once pilots start delivering tangible results, teams face a new question: How do we scale autonomy responsibly?
Adaptive autonomy
Autonomy is not binary. Tune it based on risk:
AI-led for routine, low-blast-radius fixes
AI-with-approval for sensitive or impactful changes
Human-led for uncertain or ambiguous scenarios
Teams, not vendors, should control the dial.
Cognitive coverage over alert coverage
Stop thinking in terms of “Do we detect everything?” Start asking: “Does our AI understand the system’s health across all relevant dimensions?”
Map blind spots, like unmonitored dependency spikes, just as rigorously as alert coverage gaps. This shifts the conversation from noise reduction to situational understanding.
With these principles in place, teams can expand AI SRE safely and confidently.
The point of no return: The next era through an SRE lens
Agentic AI marks a turning point for incident response. It offers a path beyond reactive firefighting and brittle automation, toward an operating model built on context, adaptability, and intelligent collaboration. For SREs and engineering teams, this shift isn’t about replacing expertise, it’s about unlocking it.
When the cognitively exhausting 80% is handled by capable agents, the remaining 20% becomes the space where human creativity, engineering judgment, and system-level thinking thrive.
If this preview clarified what’s possible, the full Agentic AI for Incident Response Guide goes deeper. It covers the architectural patterns, maturity stages, and real-world design principles needed to adopt these systems safely and effectively. It’s written to help teams move from curiosity to practical implementation and ultimately to a reliability function that accelerates, rather than absorbs, organizational complexity.
The runbook era is giving way to something new. The question now is not whether this shift will happen, but who will lead it.
As we head into the holiday season, the ilert team is doing the opposite of slowing down; we’re ramping up. Over the past weeks, we’ve shipped a wave of impactful improvements across alerting, AI-powered automation, mobile app, and status pages. From major upgrades that reshape how teams triage incidents to smaller refinements that remove daily friction, this release is packed with updates designed to make on-call and operations smoother, smarter, and faster. Let’s dive in.
AI SRE: Your knowledgeable incident buddy
You probably remember us talking about ilert Responder – ilert's first intelligent agent that provides actionable insights during incidents. In the last few months, we introduced way more features, powerful agents, and capabilities, which are now all gathered under ilert AI SRE. So, what exactly has changed?
As the previous version did, ilert AI SRE can analyze logs, correlate metrics, check recent code changes, and propose recommended actions to you and your team to resolve the incident. Moreover, ilert agents can now also act autonomously, if you give permission.
While it might sound wild to give access to a production environment to AI, you will be surprised by how many issues require manual and quick fixes, rather than intellectual work. To reduce the burden of hand-operated tasks performed in the middle of the night and gain more valuable time for long-term sustainable fixes, you can start giving AI SRE gradual access and enable automatic actions such as rollbacks to the previous healthy version or restarting a service. To make it easier for you to identify different levels of agentic autonomy, we introduced three stages in our Agentic Incident Management Guide.
Under the hood, ilert AI SRE becomes useful because it integrates deeply with your existing monitoring, observability, and deployment tools. That means you don’t need to change your stack; you connect your existing tools and let the agent work across them. Everything starts with deployment events, as they allow the agent to correlate alerts with recent code changes and rollouts, which are often key signals for identifying root causes. You can check the article on how to introduce your CI & CD pipelines to ilert, if you haven't done this before.
The next step is to familiarize the agent with your observability data. For this, you will need to connect it to tools such as Grafana, Prometheus, Elastic, etc. It's pretty simple and straightforward. And as a final step of setup, you need to set the Root Cause Analysis Policy for the agent. We recommend beginning with a manual trigger to see the agent's performance.
When the SRE agent is in place, and the first incident occurs, you can communicate with it via chat on the right side of the alert view. Just as if you were talking to your colleague. Check the live demo of ilert AI SRE at Oredev Conference in Malmö to see agentic incident response in action.
If you want to be among the first to try ilert AI SRE incident response, just drop us a message at support@ilert.com.
Connect Claude, Cursor, and other MCP clients to ilert
With the release of the ilert MCP Server, integrating your alerting and incident management workflows into AI assistants has become seamless. The MCP server implements the Model Context Protocol, an open standard that lets tools like Claude, Cursor (or any MCP-compatible client) interact with ilert over a unified interface. Through this setup, your assistant can securely list alerts, inspect on-call schedules, acknowledge or resolve alerts, create incidents – all with proper permissions and audit trails.
Connecting is straightforward: you generate an API key in ilert, then configure your MCP client using either a remote HTTP transport. Find more detailed instructions in the ilert documentation. Once configured, ilert appears in the client’s tool list and becomes available directly inside the assistant’s interface. This reduces context-switching, shortens time to resolution, and embeds incident response directly into your team's AI-powered workflow.
With the alert merge feature, you can combine existing alerts into a single main alert with one click. Merging stops duplicate escalations and notifications instantly, keeps responders aligned on one thread of communication, and preserves full traceability by keeping merged alerts available in the audit log. The result is a cleaner incident workspace, more accurate reporting, and a better foundation for AI SRE features – including automated merge recommendations during root-cause analysis.
Alert merge works hand-in-hand with event grouping: events merge into alerts, and alerts can now merge into one primary alert. Clear, intentional, and built to reflect how teams actually troubleshoot in the real world.
Filter alerts by labels for faster, targeted triage
The alert list now supports powerful label-based filtering, making it easier to zero in on exactly the alerts you care about. You can build filters using label keys and values with autocomplete, combine multiple conditions, and instantly see active filters represented in a compact ICL-style syntax. Editing filters is just a click away, and the same experience is available on mobile, so teams can slice their alert stream by environment, region, service, or any custom label from anywhere.
This brings far more precision to alert triage, especially for larger environments where labels are the primary way teams organize data across systems.
More alert filtering options
You can now also filter alerts by priority in both the ilert interface and mobile app. Whether you’re triaging from your desk or on the go, it’s easy to focus on the most critical alerts first and cut through noise from lower-priority issues.
Transparent alert grouping
To remove confusion caused by mismatched event counts, we’ve unified how grouped events are displayed across the platform. Previously, event grouping via alertKey and alert-source-based grouping were treated separately, leading to different totals in the alert list and alert detail views. The updated design consolidates these into a single, consistent event count, with clear grouping states and a detailed breakdown available in the Event grouping dialog. This ensures users always see one accurate number, regardless of the grouping method, and can easily understand how and when events were combined.
New Wait node for Event flows
Event Flows gain a powerful new control step: the Wait node. This addition lets teams pause a flow either for a specific duration or until the start or end of defined support hours. It brings precise timing control to automation, enabling smarter workflows, for example, delaying non-urgent actions outside business hours or spacing out retries with fixed wait times. The node respects support-hour configurations, including holiday exceptions, giving teams predictable, context-aware behavior.
This enhancement builds on the foundation introduced in our recent deep dive into Event Flows. The Wait node expands what’s possible with flow automation, helping teams design more reliable, human-friendly processes.
Responsive grid layout for large-scale status pages
Status pages now support a third layout option – the responsive grid – built for organizations managing hundreds or even thousands of services.
The new layout introduces a high-density grid optimized for large service catalogs. On wide screens, services are arranged in up to 12 columns within a 1536px content width, creating a clean, scannable overview. As the screen size decreases, the grid adapts seamlessly: tablets display fewer columns, and mobile switches to an icon-only mode for maximum clarity. Crucially, this layout supports all key elements such as active incidents, past incidents, metrics, and service grouping, ensuring teams can communicate status effectively at any scale.
For enterprises with sprawling architectures, the responsive grid makes status pages both performant and user-friendly, turning massive service inventories into a readable, navigable experience.
Mobile app news
Handling coverage requests on mobile just got smoother. Until now, many users didn’t realize that the top section in the coverage request flow acted only as a search filter. This meant they still had to manually adjust each identified shift in the list below before sending the request – a common point of confusion reported by several customers.
With the latest update, ilert mobile now applies the selected search boundaries to all matching shifts by default. You can still fine-tune individual shifts if needed, but the default behavior now reflects the intent expressed in the filter. The result: fewer taps, less ambiguity, and a more intuitive coverage request experience.
The heartbeat list in the mobile app no longer appears empty: we’ve migrated both the list and detail view from relying on alert sources with integration-type filters to using the dedicated Heartbeat Monitors API. This ensures your monitors are displayed correctly and in real time, aligned with how heartbeats are managed across the platform.
And a few minor but still eye- and heart-pleasing updates.
We revamped the outbound integrations (also familiar to you as alert actions) catalog. You can now see all features relevant to each connection, and it's easier to navigate through the list.
Additionally, alert action logs now show which alert and alert source each action relates to, and you can filter by these references to drill into exactly what happened, faster.
Status page email notifications now support Markdown, making it easier to format updates clearly and consistently. Bold text, lists, links, and other lightweight formatting options render correctly in outgoing emails, so teams can share structured, readable incident updates without switching tools or rewriting content.
Custom processing rules templates now behave in a way that better matches how teams actually use them: conditions only evaluate as true when a real template is present (for alertKey or any of the create/accept/resolve actions). Combined with new out-of-the-box templates for the most-used integrations, this means less guesswork, fewer “empty” conditions, and faster rollout of consistent, high-quality alert payloads.
And finally, our ilert mascot – the blue froggy – has a fresh look across the entire interface. Enjoy its brighter, more colorful style every time you open ilert.
