Mccullough Foundation report
Determinants of Autism Spectrum Disorder

This report presents a comprehensive, evidence-based analysis of the determinants of Autism Spectrum Disorder (ASD), synthesizing epidemiologic, clinical, mechanistic, and population-level research across genetic, environmental, immune, and iatrogenic domains. Prepared by the McCullough Foundation, the findings identify routine childhood vaccination—particularly early, combined, and cumulative exposure during critical neurodevelopmental periods—as the most significant modifiable risk factor associated with ASD, alongside interacting genetic and environmental susceptibilities. The full report is available below as a downloadable PDF for those seeking a detailed examination of the data, methods, and conclusions that inform these findings.

---

View the pdf here

mccullough_foundation_report_-_determinants_of_autism_spectrum_disorder.pdf
File Size:	9778 kb
File Type:	pdf

Download File

---

​PRJN4: A Numerical Risk Comparison of Vaccination and Non-Vaccination

​This judicial report presents a quantitative, population-level risk comparison between vaccination and non-vaccination, drawing from publicly available mortality, morbidity, and adverse-event data. Commonly referred to as PRJN4, the analysis evaluates absolute risk, relative risk, and real-world outcome probabilities associated with vaccine-preventable diseases and vaccine-related harms, with a focus on pediatric populations. The findings challenge prevailing assumptions about vaccine risk-benefit ratios by demonstrating that, for many diseases, the risk of serious harm or death is extremely low, while documented adverse outcomes following vaccination occur at measurable rates. The full report is available below as a downloadable PDF for those seeking a data-driven examination of these comparative risks and their implications for informed medical decision-making.

View the PDF here

https___vaxcheckers.org_wp-content_uploads_2021_09_prjn4.pdf
File Size:	3492 kb
File Type:	pdf

Download File

---

20251216-postcard_for_print.pdf
File Size:	686 kb
File Type:	pdf

Download File

---

​Risk of death | Vaccination vs. Non-vaccination
- Summary of method of calculating the risk on each side

Your browser does not support viewing this document. Click here to download the document.

​Dr. Paul Thomas – Oct 18, 2024 – Vancouver, British Columbia

​The evidence presented by Dr. Thomas goes to prove that unvaccinated children are healthier compared to vaccinated ones, and the current vaccine schedule can be damaging. He discusses the potential risks of vaccines and calls for rethinking vaccine safety testing and administration practices.

Summary

Summary
Dr. Paul Thomas testifies about the safety of children in Canada, focusing on vaccine safety and efficacy. He challenges the common belief that vaccines are universally safe and effective, presenting data from his own practice and other studies. Dr. Thomas argues that proper safety testing for vaccines is lacking, with no saline placebo controls and other methodological issues.

He presents graphs showing the rise in autism rates and discusses his observations of children regressing into autism after vaccination. Dr. Thomas shares data from his practice comparing vaccinated and unvaccinated children, indicating that unvaccinated children have significantly lower rates of various health issues including asthma, allergies, ADHD, and infections.

The doctor discusses the potential dangers of vaccine ingredients, particularly aluminum, and explains how the current vaccine schedule may overwhelm a child’s developing immune system. He argues against vaccinating during pregnancy and emphasizes the importance of informed consent.

Dr. Thomas addresses the financial incentives for doctors to vaccinate and the conflicts of interest within regulatory agencies. He calls for a reevaluation of the entire vaccine schedule and suggests that natural immunity may be superior to vaccine-induced immunity.
​
Throughout his testimony, Dr. Thomas emphasizes the need for more comprehensive safety studies, transparent data, and respect for parental choice in vaccination decisions. He concludes by urging listeners to consider information from unbiased sources and to think critically about health decisions.

Credentials
Dr. Paul Thomas is a highly respected pediatrician with a distinguished career spanning over three decades. He graduated from Dartmouth Medical School in 1985 and completed his pediatric residency, going on to teach residents and medical students for many years. Dr. Thomas ran a successful private practice from 1993 to 2022, focusing on integrative pediatrics. He is board-certified in both pediatrics and addiction medicine, demonstrating his commitment to comprehensive healthcare. As an accomplished author, Dr. Thomas has written several influential books, including “The Vaccine-Friendly Plan” and “Vax Facts.” His dedication to education extends beyond his medical practice, as he hosts informative shows such as “Against the Wind: Science Reveals” and “Good Morning CHD: Pediatric Perspectives.” Dr. Thomas is known for his evidence-based approach to children’s health and his advocacy for informed consent in vaccination.

Exhibits

ex2410van201-dr-paul-thomas-v2026.pptx
File Size:	33132 kb
File Type:	pptx

Download File

---

Transcript

Coming Soon!

THE VAXXED - UNVAXXED ​DATA
Presentation

Your browser does not support viewing this document. Click here to download the document.

Download

Supporting presentation of vaccinated vs. unvaccinated

Your browser does not support viewing this document. Click here to download the document.

Download

Data from Dr. Paul's practice, published in the International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health showed the unvaccinated had superior health outcomes when compared to those variably vaccinated or vaccinated according to the Vaccine-Friendly Plan. Since there was essentially no child in Dr Paul's practice who was following the CDC schedule, one would have to compare these health outcomes with the going rates in America as most in the US vaccinate according to the CDC schedule. ​

Video recap with Spanish subtitles:

"To ensure this video can be understood and appreciated by a diverse audience, we've included subtitles in Spanish. This enhances accessibility and facilitates sharing with Spanish-speaking viewers, regardless of their native language proficiency."

Video Notes: Dr. Paul Thomas Blows Up the Conventional Vaccine Narrative

• **Introduction (0:00)**: Dr. Paul Thomas introduces the topic - his response to the medical board's request to prove that his "vaccine-friendly plan" is as safe as the CDC's recommended schedule.
• **Study Details (1:20)**: Overview of the study conducted by Dr. Thomas, including the number of patients and the variables considered. 
• **Results (2:45)**: Presentation of the study results, showing higher incidence of various conditions like asthma, allergic rhinitis, eczema, sinusitis, gastroenteritis, respiratory infections, and ADHD among vaccinated children.
• **Explanation of Results (4:30)**: Dr. Thomas explains the phenomenon of the immune system shifting due to vaccination, leading to increased allergies, autoimmune issues, and infections.
• **Corroborating Studies (6:15)**: Dr. Thomas cites the Moston study and the Hooker and Miller study, which show similar results to his own.
• **Control Group Data (8:30)**: Dr. Thomas presents control group data, showing almost no incidence of chronic conditions like heart disease, arthritis, diabetes, asthma, or cancer among unvaccinated adults.
• **COVID-19 Vaccines (10:40)**: Dr. Thomas highlights the reported side effects, hospitalizations, and deaths following COVID-19 vaccinations, questioning the push for broader vaccination, including for children as young as six months.
• **Closing Remarks (13:25)**: Dr. Thomas advocates for informed consent and emphasizes the right of individuals to refuse treatment.

Please note: These show notes are intended as a brief summary of the video content. For complete information and understanding, viewing the video in full is recommended. ​