| |
|
|
Home |
|
|
|
|
Browse |
|
|
|
|
|
Live |
|
|
|
|
Join |
|
Collarspace |
|
|
|
|
Dating |
|
|
|
|
News |
|
|
|
|
Mobile |
|
|
|
|
Alt |
|
|
|
|
Safety |
|
|
|
|
Toys |
|
|
|
|
Friends |
|
|
|
|
Resources |
|
|
|
|
Welcome |
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Login |
|
|
 |
|
 | |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
|
| |
I'm looking to get back into the scene, i was with a master for a long time but this did not work out, partly because i have recently given birth and upon the baby being born he decided the lifestyle was harmful in a family. I disagree i believe that an outlet is always benneficiary. He has sinse put a collar on a new slave and I have decided to embrace the switch side of my personality, after all what is yin without yan, night without day. Everyone has 2 sides of the coin within them and I am willing to embrace that with either a male or a female and would love to chat with like minded individuals. |
|
|
|
|
I have had a message from a dom instructing me that all I say is wrong, that he does not have both dom and sub tendencies. This an interesting dilemma, i have no doubt that he believes this but I would argue, are the slaves not really the ones in control? they allow themselves to be controlled but it is they who pick the master, the master holds onto them by sometimes the finest of threads, and as long as he treats them right they will bow before him, respect begets respect, does this not reveal his submissive side? that he must maintain the interest of the one he seeks to control? |
| |
| |
|
|
| |
|
|
|
|
